Designing your membership program is about more than choosing what benefits to offer your members.
You need to conduct audience research to understand what potential members value and articulate a membership value proposition. You’ll use that to design a product – the membership program – that speaks to those values, aligns with your mission, and can be implemented with your existing capacity. You’ll then identify a reasonable price or prices for your membership program.
The Membership Puzzle Project has watched newsrooms spend months trying to come up with the perfect mix of benefits and pricing tiers. But while benefits can make the membership experience more enriching, they’re not as important as knowing your potential members deeply and getting the membership value proposition right. This is what hooks potential members and tells them what they’re opting into.
Once you’ve got the value proposition and branding right and you’ve identified a few ways to add value to the membership experience – your benefits – the best thing you can do is launch your membership program and see how potential members respond. The most useful feedback you get might be whether people join, why they say they joined, and what benefits they take advantage of when they do.
This section will guide you through developing the first draft of your membership program so that you can get it out the door and see what your members think.
Designing your membership program is about more than choosing what benefits to offer your members.
The process outlined here is not the only way to design your membership program. It is an accessible, entry-level suggestion informed by MPP’s experience with De Correspondent that you’re invited to riff on to suit your organization’s capacity, skills, and budget.
MPP assumes that before you get to this step, you’ve already determined that membership is viable for your organization – both whether you are organizationally ready and that you have an audience that is willing to support you.
Identify who you are designing for
The process of designing or iterating on a membership program begins with interviewing your most loyal audience members, because they’re the ones who are most likely to become your members. These are audience members who already engage with your organization at a higher-than-normal level – regular event attendees and newsletter subscribers with a very high open rate, for example.
If you have crowdfunded or asked your audience members for donations in the past, you could focus on this group, treating them as a group of beta members, analyzing their financial contributions for patterns and surveying them to understand what motivated them to support you. This is what the Daily Maverick did.
Daily Maverick took advantage of a delay with its membership program launch to answer some questions it had about its potential members.
Choose a method for gathering the information you need
Interviews and focus groups are good for understanding details about what your target audience members need, particularly details on why they behave, think, and purchase in the ways that they do. They will require more than one team member to be involved. Fewer, deeper interviews are more useful than dozens of short interviews that don’t leave room for free-flowing answers.
Surveys are useful for getting a broad cross-section of respondents, particularly when you have fairly specific questions. They require an engaged 1:many channel with audience members, such as an email newsletter or WhatsApp group. You will need a larger number of survey responses to derive actionable insights.
Jump to “Conducting audience research” for survey and interview best practices.
If you are conducting an in-person focus group or interview…
Recruit your team. You need at least a facilitator and an observer/notetaker who will capture everything said during the focus group or interview.
Select and gather your interview subjects. Do the interview someplace casual, where they can relax. Loyal audience members would likely enjoy a chance to visit the newsroom, but any place where a casual, free-flowing group conversation can happen is fine.
Do a card sorting exercise. Ask the interview subjects to sort these membership value cards by: (1) Things they get value from currently (2) Things they might get value from in the future (3) Things they don’t get value from.
(This Guide is being published during the coronavirus pandemic, which makes in-person interviews and focus groups difficult. You can perform this exercise in online focus groups using a software like Whimsical, which recreates the sticky note brainstorm experience.)
The things they get value from currently tell you what to design for, the things they might get value from in the future tells you what to consider later as you build on your membership program, and the things they don’t get value from tells you what not to consider.
This exercise will guide you toward a value proposition for your membership program and inform your decisions about what benefits to offer.
Ask a few more questions. MPP recommends the following questions to get a read on the landscape, help you identify potential future partners, begin to understand your pricing options, and offer cautionary tales to guide retention efforts.
- With whom, or with what, do you have a bond or regular relationship that keeps you coming back?
- What are your favorite causes and organizations to support? Why?
- What especially attracts you in regards to requests for your time and attention? What turns you off?
- Have you quit any organizations you used to be involved with? Why? How did you decide?
- Do you have a monthly or annual budget (of time, money, etc.) for the causes you elect to support? How do you decide how to allocate it?
- Do you financially support any other news organizations? Which ones and why?
If you have not previously conducted a membership viability assessment, you could incorporate some of those questions here.
Add some (optional) whimsy. When Membership Puzzle Project conducted this research with De Correspondent’s members to inform the design of The Correspondent’s membership experience, MPP invited members to write a postcard to De Correspondent on what membership meant to them. This type of indirect feedback can be beneficial for branding and marketing efforts, and it helps everyone in your organization experience the joy of working with members.
If you are conducting a survey…
You can adapt Membership Puzzle Project’s membership value proposition worksheet, and add the same questions offered above. If you have not previously conducted a membership viability assessment, you could incorporate some of those questions into this survey.
Synthesize the results
If you did an interview or focus group, you should review the notes immediately upon conclusion. Add any additional context needed, and highlight all the things that you think matter the most.
Wait a day, and then come back with anyone else who was present to analyze the data. Jump to “How do we generate insights from audience research?” for more on synthesis.
Pay particular attention to the insights that surprised you. What were you missing or misinterpreting about your audience before? If you conduct a focus group, you should also make a note of how focus group subjects speak about your news organization. Pay attention to the language they use, and how they say you make them feel. This is fodder for future membership branding and marketing.
Identify your membership value proposition
At the end of your synthesis process, you’ll have a clear understanding of what your members value, which you’ll use to identify your membership value proposition.
Value propositions can be phrased in different ways. MPP’s preferred format is based on the Value Proposition ad-libs method by Strategyzer:
These elements – what you make or do (products/services), who you serve (user segments), your user’s motivations (user jobs to be done), and how it works (how you reduce pain and enable gain) – are what you need to figure out in order to create a value proposition.
In this case, your product is your membership program, and your user segment is your members. Jump to “How do we identify our membership value proposition?” for a step-by-step process to completing this step.
You can’t brand your membership program or design the membership experience (in other words, choose benefits) without a strong membership value proposition.
Design your membership program
Once you have settled your membership value proposition, you can (finally!) design your membership program. This entails branding your membership program, selecting the benefits to offer, determining the price, and determining what other pathways to membership you might offer.
MPP has created a worksheet to help guide you through this process. Make a copy of the membership program design worksheet and continue reading.
As you choose which benefits to offer in your membership program, keep in mind that implementing your membership program needs to be desirable and feasible. At this stage, you should continually be asking two questions:
- Who is this element of the membership program for?
- What does this element of the membership program cost you in actual costs and staff time?
For guidance on what benefits to consider, jump to “What benefits should we offer our members?“
When selecting benefits, you should consider them against what you now know your potential members value. If they value the chance to interact with your team highly and rank discounts poorly, you should not put much energy into a citywide discount card, for example, even if it’s easy because of existing business relationships.
If you need help determining that, you can plot the list of benefits you’re considering against this matrix. The values survey you did earlier will help you decide whether a benefit belongs in the high value or low value quadrant. What it would cost you in actual costs and staff time to implement that benefit can help you determine whether it belongs in the high effort or low effort quadrant.
|Low effort||High effort|
Prioritize offering these benefits from the beginning
Consider whether there are small changes you can make to lessen the effort required to offer these. If not, depending on your bandwidth, choose just one, or put them on your roadmap for later.
Consider whether any small changes could make these more valuable to your potential members. If you don’t see a way to make them higher value, take these off your list.
Take these off your list
Once you’ve placed each benefit on the matrix, you can decide which to act on.
When setting a price, you can use member responses about other causes they support to understand what their baseline might be, and apply one or a combination of the pricing strategies used by most newsrooms that MPP details in its advice on setting a price for your membership program. (Jump to “How do we price our membership?“)
Frontier Myanmar designed its own membership program from scratch last year, and walked Membership Puzzle Project through their process for the Guide, from identifying potential member personas to the rollout of member benefits.
They began by identifying five professions who needed the journalism Frontier Myanmar produces.
A membership program is not a set-it-and-forget-it product. It’s important to take a look at the performance and cost of the program regularly and adjust your offering. Some of your benefits might take off, while others are rarely used. As your membership program grows, some of the more intimate benefits, such as the opportunity to attend editorial meetings, may not feasibly scale, and new opportunities to improve the member experience might arise.
In 2019, three years after launching with a membership program, Denmark’s Zetland hit the road to hear from members in five cities outside Copenhagen. Their goal was to gain fresh insight into what members loved about Zetland, and come up with ways that Zetland could make that easier for them to show off to non-members.
The staff heard clearly that members wanted the opportunity to show their friends more of Zetland’s journalism, so the staff proposed a new benefit: each member could create their own shareable package of their favorite Zetland stories. Before building the new feature, they surveyed their whole member base to see what they thought. The feature got a thumbs up.
Offering discounts for membership is a delicate balance. If you discount it too much, you risk devaluing membership.
Of course, you don’t have to go on a road trip to find out what your members want from their membership. Many questions about how valuable your members find their benefits can be answered with data you already have.
- If you’re wondering how valuable your member-only newsletter is, check the open rates.
- If you’re wondering how valuable member-only events are (whether online or in-person) are, check how many unique members attended a member-only event in the last six months.
- If the ability to comment is a perk, check how many unique commenters you have.
- If you offer the opportunity to gift a free membership, check how many gift memberships have been offered, and whether they are spread across many members.
- If you offer swag but members have to provide their address to receive it, check how many members actually take the step to share their address or inquire about how to get their swag.
You should also consider these data points against your capacity. How much is fulfilling each of these benefits costing you, in terms of staff time, technical support, merchandise, and shipping?
If you don’t have the data you need to evaluate how valuable a benefit is, you can survey your members.
Krautreporter and Steady co-founder Sebastian Esser recommends a simple approach: send your members a survey with just two questions: what benefit do they value the most, and which benefit do they value the least? It’s easier for your members than asking them to rank all of the benefits you offer, and the internal ranking that results from the responses will be more than enough information to decide what to stop offering.
Knowing what benefits are most valued can also help you upsell members to higher tiers if you have a tiered membership program by making those benefits available only at the higher tiers. How much effort it requires to fulfill a particular benefit is another thing to consider when you’re deciding to which tier to allocate a benefit.
When conducting this survey, you should include a list of the benefits because they might have trouble recalling the benefit they find least valuable.
You could probably make the decision based just on the ranking offered by members, eliminating those that rank poorly, but if you want an additional layer of analysis, you can use the same effort/value matrix explained above.
The ranking from your members will determine whether something goes in a high value or low value quadrant. The effort it takes to provide the benefit determines whether it goes in the high effort or low effort quadrant.
|Low effort||High effort|
Keep these benefits
Explore ways to lessen the effort required to offer these
Remove these from your program
Remove these from your program
Some questions to ask yourself as you review the matrix:
- What makes the benefits in the top left and top right so valuable to your members? What does this tell you about what your members value more broadly?
- What steps can you take to make the delivery of benefits in the top right quadrant less onerous for your team? If you can’t reduce the burden, you should only keep those options for which the value to you and your members outweigh the costs.
You should eliminate any benefits in the lower right immediately and consider what you can do with those items in the lower left quadrant to make them more valuable for your members without exerting any additional effort. If you can’t, phase those out too.
Once you make the decision to stop offering a benefit, you have to consider what you’ll say about it. If it’s a high value benefit but you don’t have the capacity to continue providing it, that likely warrants an explanation. If it’s a low value benefit, it’s unlikely members will notice that it’s gone and doesn’t justify a separate communication about it. If you provide periodic member updates, you could mention it then.
When Scalawag decided in July 2020 to stop offering its print magazine, something that members strongly valued, they sent an email explaining their decision. This communication offered transparency and reminded members of what they make possible – a reiteration of the membership value proposition.
As more news outlets change their approach to journalism in response to demands for racial justice, our work is even more imperative as a model for what media can and should do. Scalawag has long stood upon the collective values of justice and liberation in the South. Your membership has played a major role in helping Scalawag solidify its standing as a trusted media source about the South—and we’re not going anywhere.
We’ve provided a platform to organizers, incarcerated people, and storytellers from communities directly affected by injustice to share critical information and shape narratives that have real-world outcomes. Over the past year, we’ve seen that our work beyond print is reaching a wider audience than ever before.
But even with over 1,000 subscribers to our print magazine, our small nonprofit was spending over $80,000 a year—a third of our budget—on production and shipping costs. So, we’ve made the tough but strategic decision to discontinue the physical version of our work, in favor of creating more opportunities for transformative impact online and in person.
The email concluded by giving members the link to Scalawag’s payment page if the decision made them want to change their membership level.
Branding plays a critical role in how potential members perceive your membership program. Without a branding strategy, each person in your newsroom could end up conveying your program’s mission and values in a different way, making it hard for potential members to understand what they’re being asked to join.
With so many news organizations launching audience revenue efforts, branding is also a critical way of cutting through the noise. It subtly conveys your membership value proposition. It both helps to differentiate your membership program and raise awareness of it.
There are ample resources on branding and most news organizations will have a branding strategy that they can build on for membership, so MPP will offer only a brief overview of the role branding plays, as well as some additional resources.
Branding has three components:
Your brand strategy includes your purpose, positioning, and messaging. It articulates who you are and what you exist to do, what sets you apart (your value proposition), and the language you use to describe that.
Getting your membership value proposition right is the most critical component of your branding strategy because it lays the foundation for how you describe and market your membership program. MPP previously offered advice on defining your membership value proposition.
Your brand identity is encapsulated in the visual elements of your brand – the name, logo, and colors – that help audience members connect with your organization and help you stand out in their minds. Your membership program’s brand identity, from what you call your members to the swag you give them, should align with your organizational brand identity, as it does for WURD in Philadelphia, which calls its membership program “forWURD,” a nod to the station’s well-known call letters. Below is an example of visual consistency from the Daily Maverick and its membership program, Maverick Insider.
Your brand experience emerges from all of the products that audience members interact with out there in the world: your website, your social media presence, your events, etc. In the case of your membership program, this includes places like your membership landing page, a member-only newsletter, and the benefits of your membership program. We discuss benefits next.
When you get the brand strategy, brand identity, and brand experience right, you increase the likelihood that people will become members. It also makes decision-making on everything from membership appeals to event invitations easier.
Positioning itself as a disruptive outsider was not a good fit for an organization about to launch membership.
Recommended branding resources:
- Sonya Quick of Voice of San Diego for INN at Home, June 2020: Branding is Not a Dirty Word; resources for DIY branding for small organizations
- INSEAD: How to build a brand pyramid
What you call your members is an important part of your membership branding identity. Membership Puzzle Project gets many branding questions about what to call members, and how to differentiate them between membership tiers.
When choosing a name for their membership program, most newsrooms keep it simple, sticking with calling their members “member” or a word with an equivalent meaning in their language (in some countries, the term “member” has political connotations that a news organization might shy away from). Some choose a term with a close connection to the publication’s name, as The Narwhal in Canada did when it began inviting readers to “Become a Narwhal.” If you’re going to choose a more bespoke term for members, it should not be one that makes them scratch their head. It should have strong continuity with your overall brand identity.
Membership Puzzle Project advises against giving a different name to each membership tier. Giving different names to members contributing at slightly different financial levels bifurcates your community, calls out financial disparities, and can be confusing for potential members to navigate.
The exception to this advice emerges when you get into larger-dollar membership. At that point, organizations often employ different names as part of a large-dollar donor cultivation strategy. Public radio in the U.S., one of the earliest examples of membership in news, has traditionally defined small-dollar membership as below an annual contribution of roughly $250. Above this, you are moving into large-dollar donor development, which the research team has not studied extensively for the purpose of this guide.
Your benefits are a key component of how members will experience your membership program. They should align with your membership value proposition, as well as what audience research told you potential members value about their membership. Membership Puzzle Project’s step-by-step membership program design process can help you assess that.
Once you know what your audience members value about membership, you can begin choosing what benefits to offer. Based on interviews with dozens of newsrooms, the Membership Puzzle Project divides membership benefits into 10 categories.
- Exclusive access, such as member-only newsletters, events, content, website features such as comments, and enhanced opportunities to communicate with the journalists
- Early access, such as opportunities to access content or sign up for in-demand events before they open to the general audience
- Influence, such as the ability to vote in key decisions, which is common in cooperative models
- Discounts on items such as event tickets and to local businesses and institutions
- Online community, such as a members-only Slack or Facebook group and commenting
- Ad-free browsing, such as the ability to log in to the site and read without ads or access to an ad-free version of a podcast
- Ability to grant access, such as the ability to share stories that would otherwise be behind a paywall or to share your membership with others
- Swag, such as branded tote bags, stickers, and clothing items
- Short-term topical benefits to incentivize sign-ups and renewals at that time, such as a time-limited swag item or the opportunity to have your contribution matched
- Opportunity to support other mission-aligned organizations, including other news organizations, such as bundled memberships
As you choose which benefits to offer your membership program, keep in mind that it needs to be desirable and feasible. Who is this element of the membership program for? What does this element of the membership program cost you financially and in terms of staff time?
Don’t overload your membership program with benefits. You are not designing a corporate rewards program. A couple benefits that you know are desirable because you’ve conducted audience research are going to be more valuable to your members than eight scattershot ones. MPP found that benefits can increase the appeal and retention of your membership program, but they’re rarely the main reason potential members join.
If you have more than one tier, MPP also cautions against changing the benefits too frequently from one tier to another. It’s a lot for a potential member to process. One additional benefit for each membership tier is fine.
Time-limited benefits can be effective, particularly when tied to a community moment. During its spring 2020 membership drive, which began as coronavirus was taking hold in the U.S., VTDigger temporarily stopped offering its typical benefits and instead arranged for a local company to donate a cloth mask for every donation VTDigger received. The pivot away from its typical benefits was a smart move that recognized that its typical benefits, such as swag, would have seemed tone deaf and been difficult to fulfill during the coronavirus pandemic.
Coronavirus reached the U.S. as VTDigger approached their spring 2020 membership drive. They knew swag was out of the question.
Newsrooms are increasingly concerned about the inclusiveness of their coverage and how the stories they choose to tell implicitly or explicitly leave out people they want to serve. MPP learned in the user research for this Guide that many newsrooms are also concerned about the inclusiveness of their membership programs. They struggle to make decisions about member benefits, particularly what experiences should be available to their entire audience, and what should be offered as a way to enrich the member experience.
“It’s a balancing act between how much we want to celebrate and hook up our members versus you don’t want to make people who can’t afford to be a member feel penalized or dismissed or not valued. So we are always trying to walk that line,” said Sara Lomax-Reese, president of WURD Radio in Philadelphia. One small way they solve for this is by periodically opening up event ticket giveaways to everyone.
When it comes to designing the features of a membership program, MPP encourages newsrooms to think about what message each benefit sends. You choose a benefit because you think it will resonate with your members. That means that the benefits you choose say a lot about who you believe your members are – and tells potential members whether or not they belong. In this section we address two axes of exclusivity to pay attention to: place and content.
Exclusivity based on place. For place-based news organizations, being attuned to exclusivity of place is particularly important. Everything from the places to which you offer discounts to where you hold your events sends a signal about where in the city your members are. In cities experiencing gentrification, it’s important to consider whether the locations you promote have roots in the community.
You can ask these questions to assess your membership program features:
- If you’re a place-based newsroom, map out your event locations and local business partners. Are they concentrated in particular neighborhoods? Are they accessible by public transportation?
- Who is the target demographic of entities you offer discounts to or partnerships with? Do they show a similar commitment to issues of equity and inclusion?
Content exclusivity: As you consider member-only content, keep in mind that many members don’t want a gate around the journalism they support. They want to share it freely and celebrate their role in its success. The 2020 Digital News Report from the Reuters Institute of Journalism found a growing concern about information inequality, particularly in the U.S. “I pay to keep news free for everyone” is a value proposition that resonates strongly, from public radio in the U.S. to the Guardian to the Daily Maverick in South Africa. If you know that this is something your members value, allowing only them full access to your journalism would run counter to their motivations.
That said, while metered paywalls are more common in a subscription model, they are a feature of many member-driven newsrooms. Paywalls are not a model themselves; they are a payment-prompting mechanism. If you’re looking for advice on what to put behind a paywall, Membership Puzzle Project recommends the “Digital Pay Meter Playbook” from the Lenfest Institute and Shorenstein Center.
Most member-driven newsrooms without paywalls split the difference on content exclusivity by offering an array of member-only extras – such as behind-the-scenes newsletters and fireside chats with in-demand experts – while keeping the core journalism being produced available to all. But some newsrooms Membership Puzzle Project spoke to while researching this project are considering eschewing all access-based benefits because they feel it undermines their commitment to equity and is out of sync with what motivates people to become members of their organization.
“The whole point of our model is that everyone should have access to our work. The questions we ask ourselves are: How does any nonprofit have a membership program? How are we meant to be accessible for everyone while also offering member benefits? How can we create a truly inclusive membership program?” Chalkbeat’s Kary Perez told the research team.
So far, Chalkbeat has decided that they won’t limit access to anything that’s useful for creating educational outcomes. They’re also exploring how they might create pathways to membership that don’t require a monetary exchange. That’s what Maldita in Spain does – they grant member status both to those who support them financially and those who assist them as fact checkers.
Maldita weeds out trolls trying to wreck their fact checking by asking respondents to upload proof of their credentials.
Pricing discussions can be the most daunting part of designing a membership program, especially for smaller organizations who don’t have a business-side team. Much of the advice on pricing is incredibly complex and designed for larger, more corporate entities.
Most pricing research language puts support for journalism in a transactional frame, putting your membership program in competition with one-way transactions like Netflix subscriptions. But pricing membership is actually about understanding both the value of your work to someone and how much they value ensuring other people can access it.
This philanthropic giving impulse can be tricky to put a monetary value on. You may need to test out different prices until you find the intersection between your financial needs and your members’ ability to give. If you’ve asked for financial support in the past, you could study those past campaigns for clues as to what a good starting price might be, or look to other member-driven organizations that are geographically close or mission-aligned (news and otherwise) for clues as to what is a reasonable ask.
The decades-old Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity meter is the go-to method in the audience revenue space for assessing a price your audience members will find palatable. But for smaller organizations the Van Westendorp meter might be overly complex and could come across as corporate. Asking audience members to complete it in a survey could undermine the sense of community that motivates many members. Membership Puzzle Project brings it up here because MPP is often asked about pricing strategy in the subscription space, but MPP doesn’t necessarily suggest this for your newsroom.
Sebastian Esser, CEO of membership platform Steady, says that organizations tend to underprice “dramatically.” This was the case at Krautreporter in Germany, which he also founded. Krautreporter raised its prices in December 2019 for the first time, and said that they received no pushback or cancellations in response to the price increase.
After surveying dozens of newsrooms about their pricing strategy, MPP suggests one or a combination of the following strategies for determining your own.
- Looking horizontally to other membership organizations that are geographically close or mission-aligned
- Asking your audience members what other causes they support and for how much (There is language for this in MPP’s suggested membership program design process)
- Studying the range of contributions to previous crowdfunding or donations campaigns
- Launching with multiple options, or a pay-what-you-can option, and studying the patterns that emerge
El Diario in Spain took a fairly straightforward approach when they launched their membership program – they looked across the media landscape and set their own membership price (€60 a year at launch) in between the more expensive subscription-based legacy publications and the less expensive digital journalism organizations. When they launched, their membership program quickly gained traction, with little pushback on the price. El Diario has almost 60,000 members today. In spring 2020, they raised their price for the first time, to €80 a year, but experienced no dropoff in membership as a result.
The Daily Maverick used a donations campaign to test several of its assumptions about membership, including what people would be willing to give if it was left open-ended and what would happen if they changed the default amount. They found that even when given the option of giving the bare minimum required – the cost of a credit card transaction, essentially – few people took that choice.
Daily Maverick took advantage of a delay with its membership program launch to answer some questions it had about its potential members.
The Dispatch, a conservative news startup in the U.S., launched in October 2019 with a lifetime membership option priced at $1,500. They used their annual membership price of $100 as the baseline, framing it as paying to support getting The Dispatch to 15 years. They had hoped they would get 300 lifetime members, but they had 450 in July 2020.
An increasing number of organizations are choosing a pay-what-you-can or pay-what-you-want model, sometimes for a trial period and often indefinitely. The Daily Maverick in South Africa decided to use this pricing design indefinitely, while Zetland in Denmark allowed new members to set their price for the first month as part of a campaign, after which they pay about $20 a month.
Organizations choosing this pricing model cite the following reasons: It makes membership available to a wider swath of the community. (This alone is not enough to make your membership more inclusive. But if you’ve taken additional steps, such as diversifying your staff and sources, removing this barrier is a good final step.) It also makes it easy for those members who have the ability to contribute more to do so.
As mentioned before, if your value proposition is that you are producing a public good for anyone to access, then you are asking members to give in proportion to how much they value both your work and open access to it. The pay-what-you-can model harnesses the public good value and motivation more powerfully than pricing tiers.
Styli Charalambous of the Daily Maverick reflects on this dynamic: “Besides removing friction from the process, [the pay-what-you-can model] also taps into a different part of the brain — and budget. Subscription fatigue is a thing, and publishers in South Africa have to compete with the New York Times for a slice of people’s subscription budget.… But people can and do support multiple good causes that resonate with them. We wanted to convey our cause that was worthy of support alongside the Society for the Protection of Animals, National Sea Rescue Institute, or educational development programmes.”
After almost two years of having a pay-what-you-can model, the Daily Maverick has learned that although most people will not default to the lowest possible option, they had to implement some nudges to get members who could afford to contribute more to do so. In their case, they instituted a perk that only kicked in for members who contributed above R150 (about $10) a month.
A well-targeted benefit nudges those who can afford to contribute more to do so, while keeping membership accessible for all.
At WURD Radio in Philadelphia, President Sara Lomax-Reese said they see both ends of the spectrum. They’ve had people give $1,000 and say they want nothing in return, and they’ve had people who can’t meet the minimum membership tier of $90 a year, but want to show their support however they can. “There is a guy who sends me $1 every month! He sends this beautiful note. He says, ‘I don’t have $90, but I have $1.”
For organizations who don’t want to implement a pay-what-you-can membership model but want to serve the full spectrum of supporters, accepting one-time donations alongside membership can meet that need.
Swag, a common member benefit, brings a sense of fun, delight, and belonging to your membership program and can reinforce your brand identity if it’s consistent with your branding, but it’s not a must. MPP research found that swag is not a primary reason people become members of a news organization.
To be a true value add, swag needs to make members feel a stronger sense of community and it needs to be cost effective and feasible to provide.
Here are some questions to ask as you consider whether to offer swag and what to offer:
- Will people wear or use this item?
- If you plan to mail the swag, how will you get addresses?
- How much will it cost to produce/purchase?
- How will you distribute it?
- How much staff time will swag fulfillment require, or how much will it cost to outsource this?
- Is your swag equally appealing to differently abled individuals and people with different body types?
Swag fulfillment – in other words, the packaging and delivery of swag – consistently flummoxes newsrooms who underestimate the costs in staff time associated with it. But assessing how much swag costs you beyond the actual production costs is simple. The Narwhal in Canada decided to hire a person to manage swag fulfillment after estimating how much staff time it would take and multiplying that by the hourly compensation of the staff members who would do it. It was immediately clear that it was more cost effective to bring someone on to do it on an hourly basis and free up the staff’s time to do things only they could do.
When WTF Just Happened Today first launched a membership program, founder Matt Kiser offered different swag for each membership tier. Fulfilling all the orders was eating into the time he needed to actually produce the newsletter. So he stopped offering swag… and the members didn’t really mind.
“After speaking with members, it became clear that while physical rewards are nice, the real reward is supporting the continued production of WTF Just Happened Today,” he wrote on his membership FAQ.
If you can’t deliver on your membership value proposition and offer swag, MPP recommends setting swag aside until you can do both.
The other thing to consider with swag fulfillment is how you’ll get the information you need, such as size (if the swag is a clothing item) and address (if you plan to mail it). You want to ask for as little information as possible before someone completes the membership sign-up process (Jump to “Launching our membership program” for more on that ) so Membership Puzzle Project does not recommend asking for a mailing address at the signup point. Many organizations retrieve members’ mailing addresses in one of the first onboarding emails instead.
If you are unsure if your members are excited about receiving swag, asking for information at a later stage is one way to gauge enthusiasm. How many people take this small step to ensure they receive it?
Sometimes the opportunity to get limited-time swag motivates people to become members during a particular campaign. It can bring you members you might not have otherwise earned, but you’ll have to work hard to keep them – DCist found that offering coveted Washington, D.C., themed socks brought them many new members who canceled a couple months later.
Sometimes swag is more powerful as its own independent revenue source, rather than as an incentive for membership. Minnesota Public Radio’s #MPRraccoon campaign happened a few years ago, but it remains one of the best examples of harnessing a community moment to make swag that could bring in additional revenue: it took advantage of a moment, harnessed a sense of community, and tapped into a capability that MPR already had.