Newsroom overview

Who They Are
A progressive, legacy Argentine news organization focused on politics and human rights
Location
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Founded
1987
Membership program launched
2018
Monthly unique visitors
15 million
Percentage of revenue coming from membership
10 percent

Overview

When Página/12 launched in 1987, four years after Argentina emerged from a military dictatorship, it presented itself as the newspaper of democracy and human rights. Hoping to offer a different perspective to readers, it included a mix of news, investigative journalism, opinion, and in-depth analysis – all with a fresh hint of irony, which became their signature.

But by 2016, Página/12 faced two existential challenges: that of making digital journalism profitable and a change of government that put it in a disadvantaged position for government advertising, a key revenue source for media in Argentina. (Each administration tends to favor the outlets they feel more comfortable with. When the conservative Macri government came to power in 2016, it put most of its advertising with other media.) 

So when Página/12 redesigned its website in 2016, it also leaned into its slogan “The Other Look,” a nod to its status as an “opposition” newspaper. The new slogan was part of its effort to build stronger identification with readers seeking a place for critical coverage of the Macri administration. 

Página/12 found its earliest members among those readers. This case study shows how they leveraged an intellectually engaged readership to cultivate an online community built on comments. Today they average 3,000 comments a week, and while they would not share their exact membership numbers, Chief Digital Officer Mariano Blejman confirms that membership contributes more revenue than any single digital advertising contract. In other words, “the membership program is the main digital advertiser.” 

Why this is important

When Página/12 launched its new website, it chose not to implement a paywall because leaders didn’t want to limit access.  That meant they had to figure out how to make membership valuable in other ways. They decided to focus on building a community worth paying to join. 

News organizations are increasingly focused on building communities, but they often do so off-platform, in places like Facebook Groups and Slack. That’s risky, because companies can change the rules at any point. 

Building community on site, as Página/12 has, gives news organizations a more complete picture of their loyal audience members because they can see connections between reading and commenting behavior, as well as other factors such as newsletter subscriptions. It also reduces the risk that an algorithm change could sever their relationship.  

But a membership program can only thrive when a news organization gets to know its members well enough to offer desirable member benefits, and a community can only develop when you invest in it. Página/12 did both.

What they did

Before launching membership, Página/12 surveyed audience members, asking questions such as how often they visited the website, whether they read the print edition, and whether they would be willing to financially support Página/12 to help ensure its economic and editorial independence. Seventy-three percent of the surveyed members said “Yes” to the question about financial support.

Asked what kind of benefits they would pay for, members chose options such as discounts to cultural and educational events, exclusive audiovisual content, and the possibility to contribute to stories. Página/12 also learned that they typically had a high educational level, and that many of them were academics or had similar “intellectual” jobs.  

So they decided to offer two benefits: a variety of cultural offerings such as talks with reporters and online classes, and membership to an online space where this intellectual audience could engage with each other and contribute their knowledge.

The opportunity to have their voice heard is at the core of the membership value proposition. When Página/12 launched the membership program with Coral’s tool to moderate and manage comments, they made commenting member-only and appealed to loyal readers to join to “defend” their voice in the Argentinian media ecosystem, according to Celeste González, the engagement editor. 

To act on that, Página/12 offered members – who they call “partners” – the opportunity to exercise their voice on their platform. Comments are called “contributions” and likes are called “respects.” 

But offering the ability to comment and creating a community are two different things. When Página/12 launched its membership program, there wasn’t a person focused on nurturing the community. That changed when González joined as engagement editor a year later. 

Her first challenge was bringing some order to a disorganized program so that they could actually fulfill their promise to members. At that time, there was no regular delivery of newsletters, monthly talks with reporters, or someone systematically responding to comments either. 

González quickly took a few key steps: 

  • For the first few months, she read and responded to every single comment. If they commented on typos, grammar mistakes or asked questions, they would get an answer from Página/12 thanking them.
  • To spark conversation and identify opportunities for engagement, she flagged articles with a high number of comments to relevant reporters, encouraging them to respond. 
  • She wrote and published monthly profiles of members, inviting them to share how they became a Página/12 reader and their motivation for becoming a member. Her goal was to show who the people behind commenting pseudonyms were. To do that, she chose the ones who participated the most, aiming to offer a variety of profiles and maintaining a gender balance.  
  • She encouraged members to share their experience with different topics, which feeds the newspaper coverage of those issues.

The results

González undertook all the steps above because she didn’t just want comments from the same few members over and over. She wanted to have more people commenting, and she wanted them to feel a part of a real community. As the number of members has grown, so has the number of comments.

Today, members recognize each other in the comments. According to González, they already know what other people might comment or even anticipate if a member will like a given story or article. Here’s an example of one member (“canaria”) asking a member whose opinion they respect (“liliana47”) to share their thoughts. 

Last December, members asked in the comments for an in-person gathering, so Página/12 organized a holiday party. Seeing those who had met in the comments section celebrating in person was a big success for González.  

This effort to build an online community especially paid off when Buenos Aires went into lockdown at the outset of the coronavirus pandemic – one of the strictest lockdowns in the world at the time. While some news organizations scrambled to adapt to online community building, Página/12 had already been doing that for a couple of years.

Daniel Paz, the newspaper’s illustrator, began publishing daily illustrations of life in lockdown. Members started commenting, so he started to reply. It’s become a daily routine – he uploads a new diary entry every day, and then begins a conversation with members about their lockdown experience.

The COVID-19 pandemic also allowed the organization to expand the ways it works with members. After reading a reader comment asking about how coronavirus spreads, a member offered to analyze for Página/12 how the virus spread in each country

Some of that member’s colleagues joined him in that work. They already knew each other from the scientific community in Bariloche, in the southern region of Patagonia, and were used to science communication. Using WhatsApp and Google Docs, they put together a comparative analysis on how different countries responded to the crisis.  The result was a collaborative article that ended up being published on Página/12 and received more than 130,000 unique visits. As González put it, “the mutual exchange is the axis of the membership program and what makes it different.”

González also encourages the staff to participate in these conversations, but, despite a few internal training sessions on engagement, she usually still has to initiate reporter participation in the comments.

What they learned

The right indicators are crucial. When Página/12 first started tracking commenting analytics, it did it in absolute numbers: the total number of contributions and respects, regardless of who was commenting on or reacting to other members’ posts. But González didn’t want to just grow the number of comments, she wanted to grow the number of people contributing comments. So she changed how she paid attention to commenting activity. Now she is tracking the number of active commenters in any given month, as well as the total number of comments, so she can assess whether comments and the number of participants leaving them are both growing. For example, in April 2020, they had 1,256 active commenters who left 25,487 comments.

Courtesy of Página/12

One person can’t do it all. There’s only so much one engagement editor can do to create a vibrant online community. The rest of the newsroom needs to get involved, too. To encourage this, González pays attention to which articles are sparking conversations, and reaches out to the reporters directly asking them to join the conversation. Often, they don’t know how to get started, so she suggests some possible replies. She’s learned that the easiest comments for reporters to engage with are those that ask specific questions about the article.

Key takeaways and cautionary tales

Dedicated staff are essential for online community building to work. Even when a newsroom uses a tool like Coral that is designed for community management, it needs to know how to use it well. An engagement editor who identifies opportunities for conversations is an indispensable role. That person can not only feed the discussion, but share insights with the newsroom to encourage their participation. 

The right technology is, too. For Página/12, which went from having an online version of the print edition to an in-platform community in four years, that has been a major challenge. Although it has the commenting section covered, other aspects of digital membership haven’t been resolved, such as having a landing page for members. “We’re still resolving a tech debt that in terms of UX means that Página/12 still isn’t providing the user experience that we would like to provide,” González said.

Old habits die hard. Members and reporters need help understanding this new way to interact. González has had to invest time not just in encouraging members to engage, but teaching reporters the most effective way to engage back and how to incorporate that into their workflow.

To build a community, you need to know who your community members are. Página/12’s members share an ideological affinity and many of them have an intellectual or academic background. They are motivated by opportunities to share that knowledge. So Página/12 developed a member benefit – the ability to offer comments – that meets their desire to engage intellectually with others. The more you understand about what your members value, the easier it is to develop a membership program that will resonate. 

Other resources

Disclosure: Membership Puzzle Project has provided support to Página/12 through the Membership in News Fund. Aldana Vales, the author of this case study, occasionally freelances for Página/12.

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
A national trilingual news organization focused on local news and politics
Location
Selangor, Malaysia
Founded
1999
Launched membership
2019
Monthly unique visitors
5 million
Number of members
20,792*
Percentage of revenue from membership
46 percent

Malaysiakini launched a subscription in 2002, making it one of the first newsrooms in Asia to adopt an audience revenue model. In 2019, Malaysiakini introduced a membership program as a supplement to its subscription because subscription growth had stagnated and readers wanted a deeper relationship with the organization. The membership is an optional add-on, allowing subscribers to opt-in if they want (at no additional cost), or remain subscribers. 

Malaysiakini chose this blended model, rather than moving to membership alone, because of the political climate in Malaysia. Government attacks on the press are frequent, and Malaysiakini knew some readers would be afraid of calling themselves a “member” of Malaysiakini. 

“There is a wisdom in not formalizing [our membership program]. We can use the term ‘members’ informally for now. But everything that’s in writing says subscribers, even our invoices because using the term ‘member’ might make the government target them,” Chief Membership Officer Lynn D’Cruz said. 

*This is the number of subscribers. Malaysiakini was unable to provide the number of subscribers who opted in to membership.

Why this is important

The Malaysian government keeps close tabs on journalists by threatening to revoke publishing licenses and suing individuals and organizations – including Malaysiakini on several occasions, most recently in June 2020 over user comments on the site. That made readers fearful of being publicly associated with the organization. 

Because of that fear among readers that they might become targets for being “members” of Malaysiakini, the organization felt it was important to allow readers to remain publicly identified as subscribers. Readers only get invitations to become a member after they subscribe. 

The blended model allows Malaysiakini to offer options for both those who want to support and read Malaysiakini without being associated with it and those who want to engage more deeply (but still want to keep a low profile while doing so). 

MPP has often been asked what membership looks like in repressive media environments. Malaysiakini’s approach offers one way that news organizations can quietly support the engagement typical to membership models while not exposing their supporters to risk.

In addition, blended revenue models are on the rise, raising many questions about how, exactly, two models can coexist in the same organization. This is an example.

What they did

Malaysiakini has had a subscription service since 2002, but launched their membership program in November 2019. 

They began the process of designing the membership program with a survey to subscribers asking them why they remain subscribers (most said it was because of their loyalty to Malaysiakini) and what they hope to see in the future. They received a couple thousand replies. The survey showed that the top two requests were a newsletter and early access to news reports (the latter of which is still in development). 

In response, Malaysiakini introduced two membership products:

Nifty Notes newsletter: All subscribers are automatically added to the mailing list for this weekly newsletter, although they can opt out at any time. This newsletter is available to non-subscribers, too, as a loyalty-building product that might encourage them to become paying subscribers down the line.

Kini Community: An online community available to subscribers who opt-in to the membership program. Members of Kini Community are allowed to bookmark stories, follow and like comments by other members in the community, and bid for stories they want Malaysiakini to cover next. This was developed in response to readers who expressed interest in having a deeper relationship with Malaysiakini.

An image showing a mobile interface of Kini Community's "Bookmark Stories" feature which includes a icon people can click on to save a story to their profiles.
One of the features of Kini Community is the ability for members to bookmark stories. Due to the ongoing case, this example includes dummy text.

Although the journalism industry is trending away from allowing anonymous commenters, Malaysiakini opted to allow subscribers to comment anonymously to protect them from any retribution by the Malaysian government.

Malaysiakini has had to handle commenting carefully amid government pressure, particularly since the government sued Malaysiakini over five anonymous comments left on the site.

Malaysiakini’s commenting policy reads:

All comments are linked to your Malaysiakini subscription profile which we reserve the right to disclose to law enforcement agencies should they require it for valid purposes. In the past, Malaysiakini had refused to divulge the identity of our contributors, resulting in police raids and computers seized. We will continue this policy. However, there may be exceptions to this.

At the same time, Malaysiakini incentivizes Kini Community members to use their real names by giving them points for doing so. The points are akin to currency in the Kini Community, and members accumulate points by purchasing them, leaving comments, or using their real names. Points allow them to like others’ comments. 

The results

Although Malaysiakini declined to provide numbers, they say that almost one-third of their subscribers have joined since November 2019, when they launched the membership add-on and more than half of their total subscribers opted into membership.

However since the Malaysian government filed charges against the publication in June 2020, commenting on site and engagement on Kini Community has dropped, partially because of a dip in enthusiasm and partially because Malaysiakini has also reduced the number of stories it allows comments on. It no longer allows comments on the story about the ongoing trial, said CEO Premesh Chandran.

Subscribers have expressed concern that Malaysiakini will hand over their personal information to the Malaysian police, despite the fact that Malaysiakini has made clear in its commenting policy that it will not do this unless a commenter is “in clear breach of the law” – even if refusing means risking another raid of its office. Malaysiakini has had to be very clear with commenters what they can and can’t protect commenters from.

“We actually warn our [commenters] that they are responsible for their own comments, and we will hand over their personal details if required by the police. This also ensures that our readers are more responsible for their comments on Malaysiakini,” Chandran wrote to MPP.

What they learned

Having a blended model allowed Malaysians to support Malaysiakini whatever way felt safest. It was crucial to offer readers the option to remain a transactional subscriber relationship, or to opt-in to membership as well. This allowed Malaysiakini to continue to receive financial support from both types of readers. “They believe that Malaysiakini provides truthful information and this is what they’re supporting. They want access to the truth,” D’Cruz said. 

However, community building is incredibly hard when participating in the community feels risky. Malaysiakini has seen a steep decline in engagement since charges were filed against the publication. They’re experimenting with incentivizing Kini Community members to use their real names, but against the backdrop of the trial, it’s unclear if that will work.

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

If you’re operating in an environment with limited press freedom, make sure your supporters feel safe. In a country like Malaysia, where government persecution of media is strong, the number of people who want to publicize that they support a news organization targeted by the government is likely much smaller than the number of people who want accurate information but want to keep a low profile. As you choose and design your audience revenue model, it’s important to keep in mind not just what you need, but what will make your potential supporters feel safe offering their support. 

Having a blended model requires clear communication. Having two revenue and engagement models coexist in the same organization requires exceptionally clear communication with your audience members. Any confusion could lead to trouble gaining both subscribers and members. You should strive to make it easy for them to understand the difference, as well as which best suits their needs. 

Other resources