Newsroom overview

Who They Are
A nonprofit, non-partisan, and digital-only newsroom dedicated to in-depth news and reporting on public policy, government, and politics in Connecticut
Location
Hartford, Connecticut
Founded
2010
Membership program launched
2019
Monthly unique visitors
~ 250,000
Number of members
1,950
Percentage of revenue coming from membership
10 percent

Each year, as the Connecticut legislative session comes to a close, The Connecticut Mirror (which also goes by CT Mirror) kicks off one of its biggest and most successful annual fundraisers: The Gavel Give.

The Gavel Give is an aggressive 36-hour-long fundraising event that coincides with the end of the state’s legislative session. Although the timing of The Gavel Give changes slightly each year, the concept stays the same. The CT Mirror, with a 20-person staff dedicated to reporting on public policy, government and politics, uses the opportunity to remind readers about the value of their work and asks them over and over again to support future legislative reporting. The first time they ran Gavel Give in 2021, they raised about $32,000. In 2022, they raised about $39,000. 

Why this is important

The final days of Connecticut’s legislative session mark a time when CT Mirror publishes dozens more stories and sees almost twice as many visitors than usual. Kyle Constable, CT Mirror’s director of membership and digital innovation, said they decided to “channel the natural energy” that comes from the annual event and turn it into a fundraising opportunity.

Most newsrooms have similarly predictable moments of elevated audience attention. Gavel Give offers a replicable way that other small and medium-sized newsrooms can leverage intense spikes in audience interest — not just once, but repeatedly, as CT Mirror has. 

This case is particularly useful for newsrooms without dedicated membership staff. It can be hard to sustain a weeks-long membership campaign on a tiny team while still maintaining editorial operations, but reorienting staff around a 36-hour membership sprint might be more feasible.

What they did

Because Gavel Give happens almost exclusively over email, preparation begins months ahead of time with an effort to grow their email list. Each year, as part of a sprint with News Revenue Hub, Constable tests and updates CT Mirror’s newsletter sign-up calls to action on their website, including tweaking the language, location, and design of CTAs. “We want something that looks and feels different each year,” Constable explained. These small changes have a big impact: Their newsletter subscribers continue to grow, despite the fact that they regularly clean out inactive users.

CT Mirror has three core newsletters — their daily morning briefing, daily afternoon briefing, and weekly Sunday roundup — with around 15,000; 13,000; and 16,000 subscribers, respectively. They send all campaign emails to anyone who is signed up for any of their newsletters.

A match from a major donor is another key component of the campaign. A few months ahead of the inaugural Gavel Give, CT Mirror’s publisher reached out to one of the organization’s biggest donors for support. “We asked for a triple match,” Constable said, “because we really wanted to make this a notable event.” The donor agreed, and returned in 2022 to offer the same triple-match contribution.

Constable does as much work on the campaign ahead of time as possible, including designing, writing and scheduling countdown emails, and creating graphics that can be easily replicated and updated.

Their first campaign outreach for 2022 went out a few days before the fundraiser: a countdown postcard to their readers announcing their goal: to raise $36,000 in 36 hours. Forty-eight hours before kickoff, they sent a reminder email. They sent another reminder 24 hours ahead of the campaign.

The first official campaign email went at noon on Day 1 of Gavel Give. Over two days, CT Mirror sent eight fundraising emails, including appeals from reporters and editors, and updates on campaign progress. They also let readers know that all Gavel Give donations would be triple matched by an anonymous donor, something that added to the urgency of the event. Each of those emails (including the 100% email, which netted roughly another $1,000) brought in additional donations from readers.

Here’s a breakdown of the emails:

  • Email 1:
    • Sent: Monday, May 2 at 12 p.m.
    • Subject line: The Gavel Give starts in 48 hours!
    • Content: A static image reminder that the campaign starts in two days
  • Email 2:
    • Sent: Tuesday, May 3 at 12 p.m.
    • Subject line: 24 hours until The Gavel Give begins!
    • Content: A static image reminder that the campaign starts in one day
  • Email 3:
    • Sent: Wednesday, May 4 at 12 p.m.
    • Subject line: The Gavel Give STARTS NOW!
    • Content: A static image reminder about the campaign and triple-match
  • Email 4:
    • Sent: Wednesday, May 4 at 2 p.m. (and re-sent to non-openers the next day at 9:30 a.m.)
    • Subject line: Connecticut’s budget realities
    • Content: CT Mirror’s role in providing context around the state’s fiscal crisis 
    • Signed by: Keith Phaneuf, state budget reporter
  • Email 5:
    • Sent: Wednesday, May 4 at 7 p.m (and re-sent to non-openers the next day at 10:30 a.m.)
    • Subject line: How many reporters still cover the state Capitol?
    • Content: Unlike other states, Connecticut’s number of statehouse reporters has stayed the same — namely because CT Mirror has grown
    • Signed by: Elizabeth Hamilton, executive editor
  • Email 6:
    • Sent: Wednesday, May 4 at 8 a.m.
    • Subject line: The first milestone: 50%!
    • Content: A static image showing halfway progress to the campaign goal
  • Email 7:
    • Sent: Thursday, May 5 at 11:45 a.m. (re-sent to non-openers at 2:30 p.m.)
    • Subject line: In Connecticut, 2022 is just getting started
    • Content: The legislative session just ended, which means it’s time to shift gears to election season
    • Signed by: Mark Pazniokas, Capitol bureau chief
  • Email 8:
    • Sent: Thursday, May 5 at 1:30 p.m. (re-sent to non-openers at 5:45 p.m.)
    • Subject line: Getting closer …
    • Content: A static image showing 75% progress to the goal, and an ask to give
  • Email 9:
    • Sent: Thursday, May 5 at 7:15 p.m. (re-sent to non-openers at 9:30 p.m.)
    • Subject line: 90%
    • Content: A static image announcing “SO CLOSE,” and an ask to give
  • Email 10:
    • Sent: Thursday, May 5 at 11:00 p.m.
    • Subject line: 100 PERCENT!
    • Content: A static image thanking readers and inviting them to still donate

Throughout the campaign, Constable posted progress updates on Twitter and Facebook.

A dynamic progress bar also sat at the top of CT Mirror’s homepage throughout the fundraiser, yet another touchpoint for readers to learn about the challenge.

The dynamic progress bar (Courtesy of CT Mirror)

CT Mirror first introduced The Gavel Give in 2021. Their goal was to raise $30,000; they raised $32,339. In 2022, they increased their goal to $36,000. They raised $39,186.

The results

In 2021, 306 readers contributed to the campaign, including 67 people who were new CT Mirror donors. In 2022, 283 donors contributed to Gavel Give, including 72 new donors — a little over 25% of all donors. The majority of Gavel Give gifts are one-time donations.

Almost 100 people unsubscribed from CT Mirror’s mailing list during the 2022 campaign. “Do we hate to see them go? Of course,” Constable shared. “But if a hundred people off the email list means $40,000 in new revenue, I’m going to take that trade-off every day of the week.” 

Constable also created a way for newsletter subscribers to skip Gavel Give emails. Starting with the 48-hour preview, all campaign messages include a clear opt-out message and link in the footer. The message read: “Already donated or want to opt out of Gavel Give emails? Update your preferences to skip these emails specifically.” Around 100 readers took advantage of that option.

This isn’t the only time that CT Mirror fundraises. Constable said that The CT Mirror has a “mindset of constant campaigning.” They send out regular donation-request emails that feature standout stories and other newsroom updates, participate in NewsMatch, and look for other fundraising campaign opportunities throughout the year. 

“So much of the fundraising mentality is about the long-run,” Constable explained. “We’ll take the $10 monthly donor over the one-time $100 gift, because after 12 months, it’s gonna be $120 instead of $100 and so on.” 

With The Gavel Give, though, they can activate a different set of potential donors, ones who might not ever become a recurring supporter. “Different people respond to different things,” Constable added. “The Gavel Give helps us tap into those readers who get caught up in the energy of the moment and make that financial gift.”

In the end, it’s all about balance. The combination of steady membership program growth, the end-of-year NewsMatch campaign, and The Gavel Give creates “a solid blueprint for the year,” he explained.

What they learned

Build your mailing list. Constable credits much of the success of The Gavel Give to “the constant work that we are doing to grow our email newsletter list.” That work includes regularly refreshing calls-to-action, or CTAs, on CT Mirror’s website and launching new newsletters. “If we were not always adding new people to our email list, then we would have no new donors,” Constable explained.

Create a sense of urgency. By announcing a goal to reach within a certain timeframe and offering a triple match for donations made during that period, there’s palpable excitement. And through progress-bar graphics, emails from reporters and editors, and social posts, the newsroom constantly reminds readers of the goal, the deadline, and how close they are to both of those things. “The more you can create the feeling that this is an event,” Constable explained, “the more successful it’s going to be.”

Identify room for improvement. Constable and the CT Mirror team always take time after a campaign like The Gavel Give to reflect on how the fundraiser went and what they could improve next time. During the retrospective meeting, the staff discusses what worked and what didn’t; how the fundraiser felt workload-wise; whether they hit their revenue goal; and what they could do differently next year. One takeaway from 2021 was how successful the Gavel Give countdown-timer-turned-progress-bar performed on their homepage. In 2022, after CT Mirror relaunched its site, Constable’s first priority was to rebuild that bar for the next campaign.

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

Be prepared. Creating all of the campaign assets ahead of time makes a huge difference. In the weeks leading up to The Gavel Give, Constable crafts emails, designs campaign graphics, and streamlines as many processes as possible. “At the end of the day, The Gavel Give campaign is a ridiculous amount of emails in a very short amount of time, and to create each and every one of those emails takes time,” Constable said. “But if you can find ways to increase efficiency, then you’ve got a winner.”

Be aggressive. Sending eight fundraising emails in two days is a lot, but it’s part of running a successful deadline-driven campaign. Overall, Constable’s been surprised how receptive most readers are to the volume of messages during The Gavel Give. “It’s not that you can’t send too many emails; you can but you can send a lot more emails than you think you could before you’ve sent too many emails,” he said.

Be yourself. Constable said that most newsrooms can find campaign opportunities. “You know what your big moments are in the year,” he offered. “You don’t have to overthink it. Just go where your readers are and build something around the natural momentum.”

Other resources 

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
A nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization, providing Michigan readers with daily, fact-driven journalism covering the state's issues, including diverse people, politics, and economics
Location
Ypsilanti, Detroit, and Lansing, Michigan
Founded
2011
Membership program launched
2019
Monthly unique visitors
655,000
Number of members
9,000
Percentage of revenue coming from membership
24 percent

With just over 9,000 members in November 2022, Bridge Michigan has one of the largest local membership programs in the U.S. (excluding public radio membership). Their annual rolling retention rate has typically been about 70%, a little over the median rate at News Revenue Hub, of whom they are a client. 

Although Bridge Michigan’s year-end campaign in 2021 was very successful, they were churning members much more than they were used to, according to membership and engagement director Amber DeLind. Retention was down from about 70% to the low 60s. At the same time, growth had slowed. As a result, Bridge Michigan’s number of members was flat for close to eight months. 

They knew they needed to start trying some new things to address that. Bridge Michigan embraced a test-and-learn mindset years ago, and they kicked that approach into gear. This case study will walk through some of the new membership offerings they tried that brought them back to a 73% retention rate in 2022. 

Why this is important

Like many U.S.-based newsrooms, Bridge Michigan struggled with a post-pandemic and post-Trump plateau. 

Continuing to grow and retain members isn’t something that happens passively, especially when a membership program gets past its buzzy first couple years. Membership is not a “set it and forget it” product. 

Even if a newsroom isn’t seeing a plateau or rising churn, they should still be continually looking for ways to increase the value of membership for their members. This case study offers several examples of ways to diversify your membership offering to retain the members you have and attract new members who might not be interested in your core product. 

What they did

Three strategies, coupled with rising interest in political news leading up to the midterms, helped Bridge Michigan get back to the same growth and retention rates they were seeing before the pandemic: 

  1. They implemented fresh newsletter strategies that gave them a larger pool of potential members to reach by email.
  2. They launched a book club that is still running today.
  3. They offered time-limited incentives. 

New newsletters

The Bridge Michigan team recognized that if they wanted to grow their membership program, they also needed to draw more people into the mid-funnel — and in order to reach people that they had not yet managed to reach, they probably needed to offer a different editorial product. 

They hypothesized that although comprehensive coverage of Michigan is what they’re known for, there might be readers who don’t want a general interest newsletter but would be interested  in a more niche topic. In September 2021, they launched bimonthly newsletters focused on topics such as business, health, and the environment.  

During their summer and fall membership campaigns, they sent specific appeals to these newsletter lists, highlighting the coverage they had done on the beat that year. In 2022, they also held at least two virtual events related to each beat in order to give high-interest readers an opportunity to engage more deeply with the reporting. 

Book club

As the full scope of the pandemic came into view, Bridge Michigan canceled all its upcoming in-person events in March 2020..Still, they wanted to find a way to connect with readers. Why not try a virtual book club?

They resurfaced an early pandemic article highlighting several Michigan–authored books and invited readers to vote on which of those books they wanted to read first. Bridge Michigan then sent out an email announcing the book, told people where they could get it, and set a May 2020 date for the Zoom discussion.

The author joined and 75 people showed up — a “shockingly large” group, DeLind said. Buoyed by overwhelmingly good feedback, they immediately began planning the next meeting. 

In planning, they surveyed attendees, asking questions such as: 

  • What did you like best?
  • What did you like least?
  • What suggestions do you have for improving? 

They also invited Bridge Michigan readers to suggest books for the book club, using the following criteria: the author needed to be from Michigan, the book needed to be about Michigan, or the book needed to be on a topic related to Michigan. 

DeLind used her membership budget, normally allocated for in-person events, to purchase digital versions of the book club books, which members could request for free. They still offer this popular perk today.

Time-limited incentives

Bridge Michigan tried out digital contributor rewards for the first time in March 2020, giving new members who gave $120 or more a year (on a monthly or annual basis) a free one-year subscription to The New York Times or Reason, a center-right magazine. (DeLind credits Sam Hoisington, their former program manager at News Revenue Hub, with the idea.)

Bridge Michigan has since offered this as a benefit four other times: in May 2020; their December 2020 year-end campaign; their December 2021 year-end campaign; and to only highly-engaged readers in February 2022. Although they don’t have the budget to offer this sign-up benefit all the time, DeLind says that’s not necessarily an issue — she thinks that it’s a more effective benefit when offered during specific times of year. 

Courtesy of Bridge Michigan

The results

None of these strategies would have been enough on their own to restore Bridge Michigan’s growth and retention to its steady pre-pandemic levels. But together, coupled with more standard growth and retention tactics, Bridge Michigan is back at a 73% retention rate. 

The niche newsletters they began offering in 2021 have exceeded expectations. They had a goal of 5,000 subscribers for each of their five newsletters (Business Watch, Education Watch, Environment Watch, Health Watch, and Politics Watch), and they’ve reached that for all of them. Politics Watch and Health Watch reached double the goal. They plan to launch beat-specific membership drives in 2023. 

As of August 2022, they’ve held 13 virtual book club discussions with an average of 100 people at each discussion (about 75 percent of them members), including the author. They’ve had 1,613 people participate in the book club. They’ve received 7,165 requests from members for the free book downloads. 

They also launched a Facebook group to discuss the book, which has topped 600 participants. 

In their member onboarding survey, they ask people why they became a member and “the book club is far and away the biggest reason they join,” DeLind says — even though the book club isn’t member-only. And when DeLind asked members what benefit they enjoyed most in their 2021 year-end survey, the free e-book benefit was the most popular benefit across all tiers, after “I don’t need any benefits, I just want to support your journalism.”

Membership is promoted aggressively through the book club. First, it’s the only way to get the free download. They also include a membership ask in the book club announcement, the “thank you” they send afterwards, and the recording that they share with all of their readers. They’ve raised $9,000 in membership revenue from book club callouts so far. 

“I keep anticipating that interest in this will wane as people return to normal life,” DeLind says. So far, that hasn’t been the case. “It’s additive to your interest in Bridge because you like to read, but it’s enough removed that it feels like an escape,” DeLind said when hypothesizing why book club interest remains high.

Meanwhile, of the 321 donations made during a contributor-rewards campaign, 199 of them are still active. Seventy-three percent of the people who joined during a contributor-rewards gift period have stayed, compared with 67 percent for all members in the same time frame. 

What they learned 

Readers are looking for levity, too. DeLind says that the book club’s success showed them that not all membership benefits or reader engagement activities have to be directly related to their journalism. Sometimes being “fun” is enough. By focusing on books about Michigan or by authors from Michigan, they’ve been able to tap into state pride, too. 

You can offer benefits that aren’t about you. The New York Times and Reason subscriptions don’t have any connection to Bridge Michigan. But they knew their readers were interested in both state and national news and offering the subscriptions would not cost Bridge Michigan much to offer. (The full-price Reason subscriptions are $14 and they got the New York Times subscription at a steep discount of $25 each. Bridge Michigan taps their budget for membership benefits to cover the costs.)

Keep things interesting. It’s hard to keep existing members engaged and hook new members if you’re sending them the same messages over and over again – and it’s a lot easier to come up with fresh messaging if you have something new to talk about, even if it’s small. From the book club to the beat-related events, there’s always something new for Bridge Michigan to tell members and potential members about.

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

You need to have the basics in place first. Creative tactics like these aren’t worth it unless you’re maximizing the more standard strategies, such as a strong newsletter onboarding series, a strong member onboarding series, and an “always be fundraising” mindset that includes multiple campaigns a year and tailored membership asks everywhere you can put them. Bridge Michigan has all of these in place, ensuring that it avoids easily preventable membership losses and is capturing every potential member that it can. 

When growth slows, you might have to do some things differently. Until 2021, Bridge Michigan’s membership growth happened primarily through its free general newsletter. That’s still a steady source of membership growth, but the team correctly recognized that to serve other audiences, it might need a more niche product. You can start small, with just one newsletter or similar product on a beat that attracts higher-than-average readership.

Other resources

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
An independent media organization reporting and writing from the traditionally underrepresented south of India
Location
Bangalore, India
Founded
2014
Membership program launched
2020
Monthly unique visitors
10 million
Number of members
1,700
Percentage of revenue coming from membership
10 percent

The News Minute (TNM) launched in 2014 to cover the news in India from the South Indian perspective. They got a grant to launch their membership program in 2020, and for a while they thought that would be their primary source of audience revenue. 

But as they developed the membership program, navigating technical challenges that made recurring payments almost impossible and seeking ways to offer a meaningful member experience, they also ran occasional crowdfunding campaigns for specific editorial projects. 

Those campaigns have activated readers who they had tried unsuccessfully to convert to membership. Over time, TNM’s membership team – composed of Navin Sigamany, Manager – Revenue and Product; Ramanathan Subramanian, Head of Revenue and Product; and CEO Vignesh Vellore – realized that crowdfunding is not just a bridge to a membership program. It can be an ongoing source of revenue that coexists with membership. This case study will share how they got there. 

Why this is important

Many newsrooms test the viability of membership by running a crowdfunding campaign first – a sort of temperature check on whether audience members appreciate their work enough to financially support it. Once they get the membership program infrastructure in place, most newsrooms stop crowdfunding campaigns. 

MPP doesn’t necessarily recommend trying to maintain two audience revenue streams side by side. It can be logistically challenging and confusing to the potential supporter. 

But The News Minute did it in the reverse order, launching membership first and crowdfunding as a supplementary revenue stream. They have now maintained a membership program and several crowdfunding campaigns side by side for more than a year. 

This case study will offer insight into how a member-driven newsroom can also collect financial support through crowdfunding. It might be particularly useful for newsrooms operating in environments in which recurring payments are a challenge. 

What they did

News Minute has designed three ways by which people can become a financial supporter.

They began by launching a membership program in April 2020, with two types of membership, followed by three crowdfunding campaigns in 2021. 

A membership program

In 2019, Chennai and Kerala faced catastrophic flooding. Members of the TNM community helped connect relief efforts with people who needed them and affected people with their family members in other parts of the country.  

Their volunteerism got the TNM membership team (then led by Ragamalika Karthikeyan, Editor, Special Projects & Experiments), CEO Vignesh Vellore, and Editor-in-Chief Dhanya Rajendran thinking about other ways they could engage this community and leverage that engagement for audience revenue. They launched a membership program in April 2020 with the help of a Google News Initiative grant. 

Recurring payments are technically challenging in India due to local banking regulations, so members pay on a six-month or annual basis. They offered a fairly typical member experience of member-only newsletters, the opportunity to attend a monthly editorial meeting where they planned stories, and access to member-only events, most of which have happened on Zoom because of the pandemic. They also launched a Discourse community where members could talk to each other and their staff and made their app members-only. 

You can learn more about The News Minute’s member experience in the 2021 MPP report, “Building healthy member communities: Lessons from newsrooms around the world.” 

A membership tier for the Indian diaspora

The Chennai rains also showed TNM that many of its readers lived outside India and would be in a better position than those in India to financially support TNM. They decided to try and build a membership experience specific to the needs of diaspora readers.. 

Because recurring payments are easier with bank accounts outside India, TNM offered diaspora members the option of monthly payments. They also offered them access to a “help desk” through which members could ask TNM staff for help with things that were harder to manage from outside the country, such as help identifying doctors for aging parents in India or lawyers to help out on specific legal issues.

Crowdfunding for specific editorial initiatives 

As they approached the one-year anniversary of their membership program, TNM started taking a closer look at crowdfunding. Other publishers in their market, such as Newslaundry, had successfully run single-issue crowdfunding campaigns. TNM also had a few members who would not open any emails from TNM and would never attend any events, but would give money at every opportunity, which showed TNM that, for some people, the member relationship might not matter much. 

They decided to test crowdfunding with a small, generic campaign in February 2021 for TNM’s birthday. They received almost 100 payments in just 48 hours. The velocity of the response surprised and encouraged them. “We thought, if 100 folks are ready to give some money without thinking twice about it for our birthday, surely we will be able to get more people to give money about specific issues that are close to them,” Sigamany said. 

Getting a crowdfunding campaign off the ground was relatively easy from a technical standpoint. Because of the membership program, which was almost a year old at that point, TNM already had the infrastructure in place to receive money from readers. Encouraged by the birthday campaign, they ran three major, issue-based crowdfunding initiatives in 2021. 

The first was pegged to the April 2021 local elections in the states of Tamil Nadu and Kerala offered that opportunity. They drafted a comprehensive coverage plan – senior journalists on the campaign trail, on-the-ground reports, a focus on the issues that mattered to each of the constituencies – and ran a six-week campaign to raise funds to support the coverage.

In June 2021, they launched the eight-week COVID-19 reporting project, which has been their most ambitious – and successful – crowdfunding campaign to date. Their campaign launch announcement detailed the work they had done for the first 15 months of the pandemic and laid out what more they could do with dedicated reader support. During the campaign they sent periodic email updates to those who had contributed, letting them know the stories that had been published, and continued to share major stories with the campaign supporters after the campaign ended. 

For the final issue-based campaign of 2021, they focused on the concept of cooperative federalism or the sharing of power between the state and federal governments. This is a hot topic in South India, where four of the five states are led by opposition parties and are often at odds with the federal government. This campaign ran for 10 weeks.

TNM launched a newsletter for the project and sent an update every week on the latest stories and what they would be covering next. Every update also included a request to support their continued reporting on the topic, as did their member newsletters. 

Since 2021, they’ve also done a series of smaller crowdfunding campaigns around anniversaries or lawsuits from the government. 

Applying a crowdfunding approach to membership 

Before these crowdfunding campaigns, they had never run a high-intensity membership drive. 

In 2021, torrential rains in Chennai once again caused catastrophic flooding. Three-quarters of the city was submerged, but national media was barely covering it, Sigamany recalls. 

The staff realized they needed to be there. TNM is headquartered in Bangalore, in neighboring state Karnataka, and TNM was founded to cover South India from a South Indian perspective. 

They got a team on the ground and started asking for people to become members to help sustain their comprehensive coverage, ultimately running the campaign for three weeks, while their staff was on the ground covering the floods and the recovery. They chose to use the campaign to build membership because it meant they could use their existing membership tools. (The other crowdfunding campaigns had been run fairly manually.) 

The results

After six crowdfunding campaigns and more than two years of maintaining a membership program with tiers for members in India and in the diaspora, Sigamany shared three topline results that we’ll detail below. 

Membership is unlikely to be TNM’s primary source of audience revenue – but it offers other value.

As of November 2022, the News Minute had 1,700 members. They’ve had a total of 5,000 members since 2020, but more than half of their members have churned.

Recurring payments are very hard in India and Sigamany spends hours a week manually contacting lapsed TNM members to try and get a payment back on file. He also hypothesizes that some have quit because the member experience isn’t what they expected.

Sigamany now thinks about members differently. They contribute other things that can be as hard to come by as money: constructive feedback, time and sustained attention. 

He shared multiple examples of members weighing in at editorial meetings and through sneak peeks at features that helped stories and products succeed. They are significantly more engaged than anyone else that reads TNM’s journalism, including crowdfunding contributors. Given the comparative financial success of the crowdfunding campaigns (more on that below), Sigamany now thinks of members primarily as a sounding board with whom they can test out new things before rolling them out to the broader audience, ensuring a better final product.  

“That type of information is usually very difficult to get. [With non-members] you have to follow up multiple times,” he said. “That’s where the big value of membership comes in. Even if ultimately it ends up being maybe 30 percent of overall audience revenue, the engagement is where it becomes crucial, especially when you’re building out new offerings.”

Going forward, they’ll put more effort into member stewardship to maintain that relationship.  

Other changes they made: 

  • They killed a member-only arts newsletter that was produced by an external agency. It had a few superfans but never took off. Sigamany hypothesizes that readers didn’t think of TNM as a place to go for arts coverage. 
  • They abandoned their member-only community on Discourse and moved it to Facebook, realizing it was too hard to get people to move to a new platform just for The News Minute. 

Diaspora members didn’t care about special benefits. 

Between 10 and 20 percent of TNM’s members are Non-Resident Indians (NRIs), an official government designation for Indians living overseas. But fewer than 10 people have accessed the help desk. The opportunity to pay monthly instead of biannually is similarly underused. Fewer than 20 percent of NRI members have opted for the monthly billing option.

The lesson for TNM was that diaspora members didn’t need anything special. 

“Every time we tried to do something that was focused on the diaspora, we didn’t get the interest we thought that we would get,” Sigamany said. They interviewed dozens of their diaspora readers about what would make their TNM experience better and “it kept coming back to the stuff we’re doing already”, he said. 

TNM still offers the help desk and monthly billing but aren’t planning to invest any further in differentiating the NRI member experience.

Crowdfunding campaigns are where they think will get most of their future audience revenue

TNM ran three major crowdfunding campaigns in 2021. 

  • April 2021, local elections: About 100,000 rupees from about 100 people
  • June-July 2021, COVID-19 Reporting Project: About 500,000 rupees from around 300 people
  • Late 2021, cooperative federalism: About 150,000 rupees from about 100 people

For context, the total of these efforts was about 2 percent of their 2021 revenue, while membership brought in about 10 percent. Once they have the right tools, they’ll be able to run multiple campaigns concurrently, each on a different topic.

About 60 percent of the funding in the election campaign came from a relatively small group of people – and TNM has struggled to figure out how to act on that information. Sigamany said that they recognize that engaging major donors requires a different skill set that they don’t have right now. 

They’ve also run a few more general crowdfunding campaigns, such as ones pegged to anniversaries or government lawsuits against TNM. Sigamany said these haven’t performed as well as the campaigns for specific projects but they require substantially less effort. They’ll remain part of TNM’s strategy but they’ll do very little for them – no special graphics, no special events, no special products. 

Meanwhile, the membership campaign pegged to the 2021 Chennai rains, brought in about 140,000 rupees from about 110 people. “It was unusual in that we had a lot of people who contributed fairly small amounts of money – about 100 rupees or $1.36 around that time. That’s about one-tenth of TNM’s average crowdfunding contribution,” Sigamany said. “These are people who did not have the money to spare but they wanted to support us in some way. At the end of the day it was showing solidarity for us,” he said.  

Sigamany said there was little overlap between the supporters of each campaign. 

Now that they’ve landed on a strategy that’s partially proven itself, they’re aggressively building their email lists to expand the number of people who receive the crowdfunding appeals. Sigamany’s goal is to eventually be able to run three or four campaigns at once, each built around a different editorial project or interest – but right now they’re navigating ongoing issues with payment processors, so they’ve paused all campaigns for awhile. 

What they learned

Each issue has its own set of appeals and people who will come and support it. “Out of 1,000 supporters, maybe 100 of them will give money to the election; 100 people will give to the rains [campaign]. But the overlap between them was not much – maybe 20 percent,” Sigamany said. That’s actually a good thing – it greatly expands the number of people TNM can target with an appeal. 

A lot of supporters didn’t want a “member” experience. There are a lot of people out there who don’t want a member experience, for whom a recurring payment is too big of an ask or who are only interested in one coverage area. Membership isn’t appealing for them. “We got it wrong. We had membership as the core offering and the ability to make a one-time payment was an extra,” Sigamany said. By focusing exclusively on membership, TNM was giving up another important revenue opportunity.

But the ones who do want that member experience offer something deeper than money. “What membership actually gives us is a kind of engagement that we don’t get otherwise. Members are the ones who turn up to events, they ask questions, they are the voice of our audience. They turn up to editorial meetings and propose ideas. The membership is where you give us more than your money, you also give us your time and attention,” Sigamany said. They plan to test any new features or products with their members first.  

Don’t design something extra if people don’t need it. TNM tried a number of things to create a compelling member experience for diaspora members and, two years in, it’s made little difference. Diaspora members aren’t making use of the benefits created specifically for them. They just want to support The News Minute, same as the members in the country. 

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

Be prepared to accommodate many different behaviors. The News Minute assumed that membership is something everyone who supports their work would want. But they found that even people who had contributed to multiple crowdfunding campaigns were often uninterested in the deeper member experience. TNM needed to stop trying to convince those people to join and to instead focus on making it as easy as possible for them to support in the way they wanted. Newsrooms can’t change what supporters want out of their relationship with the newsroom, they can only change how they respond to different preferences. 

“We have always positioned crowdfunding as a way to support specific projects with one-time payments, while membership is a longer term commitment to support the journalism we do. We do not present them as mutually exclusive, but as being available for people to support in whichever way they feel comfortable with,” Sigamany summed it up.

Other resources 

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
PublicSource is a nonpartisan, nonprofit, digital-first media organization dedicated to serving Pittsburgh and the region.
Location
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Founded
2011
Membership program launched
2016
Monthly unique visitors
80,000
Number of members
1,112
Percentage of revenue coming from membership
10 percent

Match funds – in which an organization secures a large financial commitment from a foundation, contingent on raising an equal amount of money from other sources – are a key component of many American nonprofit newsrooms’ fundraising efforts. That’s the premise behind NewsMatch, a national U.S. matching gift campaign that runs annually from Nov. 1 through Dec. 31. If a NewsMatch participant reaches a predetermined fundraising goal, it gets a portion of the national match pool.

However, starting in 2021, news organizations with annual operating expenses over $1 million were no longer eligible for national match funds from NewsMatch. In 2022 Pittsburgh’s PublicSource, previously a beneficiary of the NewsMatch national match pool, built its own match pool, first by securing NewsMatch partner funds and then by rallying individual supporters to form their own match pool. They were able to form a $50,000 match pool, which they leveraged to raise another $60,000 in their year-end fundraising drive. 

Why this is important

Match campaigns have become a staple of American nonprofit newsrooms’ fundraising strategy. They add urgency and impact to fundraising campaigns, making it easier to pull in first-time supporters and to get additional funds from existing supporters. PublicSource’s most successful fundraising drives – in terms of number of donors and greatest donation amounts – are now ones with match funds attached.

Although many newsrooms across the U.S. employ match campaigns, MPP chose to highlight PublicSource because their approach highlights a way to leverage your board and highest contributing members, not just foundations. Newsrooms that aren’t eligible to receive foundation support, because of for-profit status or government restrictions, could employ this tactic not just with individuals, but companies. It also provides a great example of how to give your board a task that leverages their network. MPP believes that this approach could also be applied to longtime members who have shown interest in contributing more than financial support.

What they did

PublicSource began experimenting with match campaigns as part of NewsMatch. With NewsMatch, if a newsroom reaches a predetermined fundraising goal, it gets a portion of the national match pool. When NewsMatch changed the eligibility criteria for receiving matching funds, PublicSource took what it learned about successful match campaigns and created their own Pittsburgh-based pool.

Here’s how they did it:

Step 1: Source foundations who might be interested in contributing to a match pool

PublicSource received seed funds from several local foundations to help launch their newsroom, but Alyia Paulding, PublicSource’s membership & development manager, said they couldn’t rely just on those organizations forever if they wanted to be sustainable. It’s important to continue researching and prospecting for local foundation support, including smaller foundations that haven’t funded journalism before. 

One way PublicSource found new prospective funders is through community listening tours. They created a network map of local philanthropic foundations, devised a plan to meet prospective funders, and developed a series of questions to find out what philanthropic leaders are concerned about, what issues they’re focused on, and where they’re getting information.

“We’re just inviting people to have 15- to 30-minute conversations with us,” Paulding said. “It’s been wonderful. Sometimes it will lead to funding or support and sometimes it won’t, but it always leads to a connection.”

Paulding and her colleagues maintain a record of who they’ve talked to, notes about background and experiences, and takeaways from each conversation. 

“We conduct these conversations with people at all levels of giving capacity,” Paulding said. “While philanthropic leads come out of these chats, we very much want to be in contact with our community, and this is one way of doing that.”

Step 2: Pitch foundations on joining a matching pool

Once you’ve identified prospective local foundations, “a small match grant ask can be a great door-opener, especially if you have a foot in the door already,” Paulding explained. 

“Perhaps there’s a foundation who appreciates your work but has indicated they don’t want to give at a large level, or with whom you’ve discussed a particular program or project that didn’t end up panning out,” she added. “Maybe a $5,000 matching grant would fit perfectly for them.”

Many times, foundations don’t want to be the first to support something, so it’s helpful to already have some matching funds secured if you’re pitching someone for the first time. For existing  and past funders, staying in touch and passing along articles from your newsroom that are relevant to their priorities can be a good starting point for a conversation about being part of a match pool, Paulding said.

“We make connections for them between journalism and their areas of interest,” Paulding explained. “For an organization with an education focus, we’ll point to our education reporting.”

Paulding also added that it’s helpful to have evidence showing the success of matches in the past. 

End-of-year campaigns are a prime opportunity to ask foundations for donations in smaller amounts (between $1,000 and $5,000, for example) because they might have funds they need to allocate by the end of the year.

Step 3: Pitch individuals on joining a matching pool

The PublicSource team knew that they couldn’t rely solely on local foundations for matching grants, so in 2022, they reached out to regular individual supporters to pitch them on helping to create a match pool for individual supporters. 

First, Paulding sent emails to existing supporters, including versions for supporters with no additional gifts scheduled for the year, those with an upcoming recurring gift, and donors with a history of end-of-year giving. In those emails, she explained the idea behind the match pool and offered to schedule a Zoom or phone call or meet for coffee to talk about it further. 

“I wondered if you might be interested in using this year’s gift as a match to inspire other readers,” she wrote in an outreach email. “We typically have a year-end match pool where some of our donors pledge to match gifts in November and December. Matching is a very powerful tool and routinely results in our biggest fundraising response; our readers really love to give when their donation is matched!”

Paulding also made a presentation to PublicSource’s Board of Directors in which she outlined PublicSource’s fundraising goals and asked board members to help by recruiting their personal contacts to contribute to the match pool. Her pitch: “The power is in inviting people to join you.” She even role-played a conversation with a board member and potential match donor and gave board members an email template they could use.

The results

PublicSource raised $5,000 in matching funds for their spring 2022 campaign, all from just one foundation donor. 

For their 2022 end-of-year campaign, using the tactics outlined above, they secured a $50,000 match pool. Of that, $30,000 was from two foundations, partner match funds secured through NewsMatch. The remaining $20,000 came from 11 individual donors. The median individual donor gift was $1,000.

The last stage of a match campaign is the small-dollar fundraising drive to bring in as many donations as possible. You’ve likely gotten emails from a newsroom saying something like, “Donate today to help us unlock $20,000.” That’s this stage of the match campaign. 

In a typical match campaign, the organization only gets to keep the match pool if they reach their small dollar fundraising goal; the urgency is a motivator for new supporters.  PublicSource’s goal was $50,000, equal to the size of the match pool.

Their fundraising drive included:

  • Drafting email signatures to advertise the campaign and sending instructions to PublicSource staff members to adopt that language
  • Creating onsite appeals, including pop-ups, in-story ads, and homepage banners
  • Drafting a robust email campaign for all newsletter subscribers
  • Preparing social posts, including slides for Instagram stories
  • Compiling a list of reader testimonials, to quote in social posts and newsletter toppers
  • And creating a calendar to keep track of social posts, fundraising emails, and newsletter toppers throughout the campaign

The 2022 end-of-year small dollar campaign raised $62,635 from over 300 donors. More than 100 of them were first-time donors. PublicSource also unlocked an additional $4,000 in match bonuses. In total, the campaign brought in $116,635.

“We were fortunate and grateful to receive a couple larger gifts, but as always, overall success came down to small-dollar donors stepping up,” Paulding said. 

Raising their own local match pool, rather than tapping the NewsMatch pool, gave PublicSource much greater flexibility, she added. NewsMatch’s pool came with restrictions, such as a $1,000 maximum per donor and only matching double the one-time amount. 

Their own local match pool had no such restrictions. This allowed them to shift to a triple match to energize their campaign when it hit a slump in mid-December (in a triple match, a $10 contribution would be matched at 3x, so $30). 

“[It] allowed us to overcome the late-campaign stall-out many other newsrooms were experiencing,” she said. 

Editor’s note: MPP did not go into detail on how PublicSource runs its small-dollar campaign because it has substantial overlap with advice already given in the section “Growing your membership program.” In the “Resources” section, you’ll find their campaign schedule. MPP also recommends reading case study “How The Tyee plans a crowdfunding campaign in a week” to get a detailed overview of a successful 6-8 week campaign.

What they learned

Start with existing supporters. PublicSource began soliciting individual contributions to the match pool by identifying people who they deemed “very reliable supporters” – those who made recurring donations, attended PublicSource fundraising events, or given generously in the past.

Paulding reached out to one donor with a recurring $1,000 gift that would be charged soon. “We said, ‘Hey, your gift is coming up, would you like to be part of the match pool?’” Paulding recalled. That donor not only said yes, but asked to increase her gift to $5,000. “You never know when asking will pay off,” Paulding said.

Connect your ask to something they care about. When reaching out to existing donors, whether foundations or individuals, Paulding relies on information she’s compiled about the issues they care about, such as a comment they made about a specific beat or an event they attended in the past. The community listening tour mentioned above is another good source of information. “It’s easier than designing an entire fundraising campaign for anyone and everyone,” she said.

Finding community support isn’t just about fundraising. Paulding and team track all of the takeaways from their community listening tour conversations in a master document. That document is important for tracking philanthropic leads, but also helps them get a sense of overall themes about people’s information needs, media habits, and areas of interest – valuable information they share with the PublicSource editorial team. 

Matching works. Match campaigns are a major driver for new individual donations. “We’ve seen the greatest number of donors and the greatest donation amounts when gifts are matched,” said Paulding, adding that many donors will specifically leave comments with their gifts that say, “I’m giving because of the match.” 

“I have the sense that people wait all year for these opportunities,” Paulding added. “People give because they want to feel like they’re part of something that’s doing good, and when they feel like they’re doing something that’s doubly good, it’s a wonderful feeling.”

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

Don’t rely too heavily on one source of funding. Many newsrooms, not just PublicSource, had to shift their approach to end-of-year fundraising after NewsMatch changed its requirements. The NewsMatch decision is a good reminder that foundation goals, strategic focuses, and criteria for support can change, sometimes without much notice, and being dependent on any one funder, even just for an annual fundraising campaign, is risky. 

Be willing to be vulnerable. In 2021, when PublicSource began building a relationship with a new foundation, they told them about the NewsMatch change and how it would affect them. That foundation agreed to give them a $25,000 matching grant to make up for the shortfall. “That was absolutely catalytic for us,” Paulding said. “We realized we don’t need gigantic operating support [from Newsmatch] in order to help us do what we know works.”

Small donations add up. “When someone says that they’ll give a $200-a-year donation to the match pool, I’m excited,” Paulding said. Combined, those smaller donations can build to a sizable match pool that brings in even more donations.

Other resources 

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
A narrative storytelling organization that publishes, teaches and promotes storytelling as an essential tool to transform lives, organizations, and society at large
Newsroom
DoR (Decât o Revistă)
Location
Bucharest, Romania
Year launched
2009
Membership program launched
2019
Monthly unique visitors
102,000
Number of members
4,900
Percentage of revenue coming from membership
30 to 40 percent

As the Romanian narrative storytelling organization Decat o Revista (DoR) headed into 2020, they were midway through their transition from a quarterly print magazine to a digital member-driven newsroom and events organizer. (Today, DoR still publishes the magazine, but it is no longer their core product.) The pandemic swiftly eliminated many of DoR’s other revenue streams, such as large, live events. As a result, they realized they had to accelerate the slow but steady membership growth that began in 2019. 

Inspired by Zetland’s “members-getting-members campaign,” which MPP also documented in the Membership Guide, they launched an ambassador campaign, appealing to their existing members and  “endorsers” – public figures with large social media followings who already read DoR’s journalism – with the goal of doubling their membership, from 2,250 people to 4,500. 

By the end of the six-week campaign, DoR exceeded their goal, bringing in 2,500 new members. At the end of 2020, they had 4,920 members. This case study will share how they planned, staffed, and executed their campaign. 

Why this is important

When newsrooms make their membership growth plans, many of them forget about one of the most powerful acquisition tools they have: the enthusiasm of their members. Membership is, among other things, an opportunity to enlist your core supporters in your quest for impact and sustainability. 

From a process and tech perspective, DoR’s campaign wasn’t that difficult. They did this with a simple set of digital tools. They didn’t offer ambassadors a bunch of swag – just the opportunity to be a part of a positive story in a year where there weren’t many. 

The success of the campaign can be attributed to three things: 

  • Meticulous planning
  • The formation of a team to own the campaign tasks
  • The strength of DoR’s community

MPP will detail the first two below. If you don’t yet have a strong community gathered around your work, you should work on that first, beginning with MPP’s research, “Developing memberful routines.” But if you do, then a successful ambassador campaign is completely achievable.

What they did

DoR first began discussing an ambassador campaign in summer 2020, when they realized the impact that the pandemic would have on their business. Community manager Carla Lunguți led the planning process, which featured these key steps:

They created pop-up teams. They began by assembling a five-person exploratory team to establish the mission, targets, and technological needs of the campaign. The team included Lunguți, plus their visual editor, newsletter editor, product manager, and coach.

In September, they replaced the exploratory team with a campaign execution team, led once again by Lunguți and including the product manager and visual editor. To accommodate the different needs of campaign mode, they added the newsroom manager (to handle customer service), their communications manager, and their developer. Founding editor Cristian Lupsa also periodically joined the meetings to review their plans with fresh eyes. 

They identified their campaign schedule. Although most campaigns are three to four weeks, they decided on six weeks. They were worried about the aggressiveness of a shorter campaign during the pandemic and originally planned eight weeks, with plans to end on DoR’s 11th anniversary on Nov. 15, but they were not ready to launch on Sept. 15, so they shifted to a six-week campaign that began Oct. 1.

The campaign had three distinct phases: 

  • Weeks 1 and 2: Launch and introduce the central campaign message: that stories heal. The DoR team wrote on Medium, “The healing potential of journalism and storytelling is the thread that runs through many of our editorial decisions: the stories we publish are human-centred, following experiences that transform people as well as communities.”
  • Weeks 3 and 4: They stopped sharing campaign updates and asking people to join, instead focusing on the impact of their work and inviting community members to share stories of how DoR’s storytelling has had an effect on their lives. 
  • Weeks 5 and 6:  DoR refocused the message on their progress toward their goal, including a daily countdown.

DoR stopped pushing the campaign during the third and fourth weeks because they knew from studying other campaigns that there is usually a mid-campaign slump. They didn’t want to exhaust their readers, or their team, instead saving their energy for the final push. 

“One idea that was important in the meetings was ‘let’s not sell.’ If we sell for six weeks, that will be annoying. We know there’s a slump. If people like the stories and enjoy how people talk about the work they do, they will buy,” Lupsa said.

They broke their membership goal down into daily targets. This helped the big goal of 2,500 new members feel more attainable and helped them monitor their progress.

  • First three days: 85 new members/day
  • Rest of week 1: 75 members/day (40/day on the weekend)
  • Weeks 2 through 4: 50 members/day (30/day on the weekend)
  • Week 5: 60 members/day (30/day on the weekend)
  • Week 6: 100 members/day (85/day on the weekend) 

They recruited ambassadors. Their campaign partners fell into one of two groups: existing members, who they called ambassadors, and endorsers, public figures who appreciated DoR’s journalism and had large follower counts.

About 665 ambassadors joined the campaign. DoR recruited about 100 ambassadors in an email to their existing members. The rest of the 565 ambassadors joined in response to callouts during the launch week. The DoR team emailed all of the ambassadors an ambassador kit that included a set of visual assets they could post to their own social media accounts with messages such as “I am an ambassador for the DoR campaign,” as well as instructions on how to get their personalized URL so they could keep track of how many people they recruited.

They made Instagram assets for posts and stories, and made both “Swipe up” and “Link in bio” options for the story template.

Ambassadors who recruited 5, 10, 15, or more members received surprises from the DoR team, such as illustrations, the most recent issue of the print magazine or a workshop with someone from the DoR team. DoR sent a weekly newsletter to ambassadors updating them on the campaign’s progress. 

Translation: “I am an ambassador for DoR. Help us double our community subscribers.”

In Romanian, the word “member” has a political connotation, so they use the term “subscriber” in external communications.

Translation: We are doubling our community subscribers. Stories heal.

They also recruited 14 endorsers, most of whom had previously worked with DoR in some way, such as writing a story, appearing at one of its events, or joining a podcast. DoR made a kit of visuals, similar to the one they made for the ambassadors, for them and gave each of them a free membership as a thank you.

They planned all their content ahead of launch. That included things like video testimonials from their ambassadors about why they supported DoR and staff testimonials about their work, both on video and via personal essays about why they write for DoR. They publicized the campaign on their site, in their newsletters, and on their Instagram and Facebook accounts. They also took out Facebook and Google ads to promote it.

They set up an easy-to-use referral system. They used AutomateWoo, a WooCommerce plug-in, to create unique links for each ambassador. They already used WooCommerce to manage their e-commerce, including membership purchases and merchandise, so the team and their existing members were familiar with it. All a member had to do was log in to their account to receive their unique link. 

The results

DoR exceeded their goal, reaching 2,550 new members in six weeks. 

A few other numbers:

  • Their strongest day brought them 208 new members. 
  • Their weakest day brought 13 new members. 
  • 30 ambassadors recruited 5 new members each, six ambassadors recruited 10 members each, and three ambassadors recruited 15 new members each
  • 1,386 new members signed up as annual members, and 1,164 signed up as monthly members. 
  • About 25 percent of the new members came through ambassadors’ unique URLs, but DoR knows that some ambassadors did not use their codes, so the number recruited by existing members is likely higher. 
  • About 1,000 of the 2,500 new members came from social media, mostly via posts made by community members, not DoR’s own posts on social media. 

They brought in 300 new members in the last two days of the campaign via a simple message that shared that they were two days from the end of the campaign and hadn’t yet reached their goal. This bump put them way over the top of their 2,250-member goal. 

But “the messages we had no control over worked best,” editor Cristian Lupșa said, referring to posts by community members promoting the campaign such as one from an illustrator who shared that DoR gave them their first break (see below), or sources who said that DoR changed their lives by telling their story. Once a couple people posted, dozens of people who worked with DoR over the years followed suit, and DoR shared these messages from their own channels. This was particularly helpful during the mid-campaign period, when DoR stopped making explicit calls to action. These community calls to action kept them in line with their daily targets, even without doing any marketing themselves. 

Approximate translation: “It’s been 11 years since DoR’s first print magazine, and they’re looking for new supporters so they can continue to publish. https://www.dor.ro/sustine/
DoR was one of my first true collaborators. They trusted me and always welcomed my illustration proposals with open arms. I think they gave me the opportunity to draw some of my best illustrations so far. It has always been a pleasure to work with the people from the DoR team, who have always amazed me with their involvement and dedication, but also because their materials are so beautiful and well written.
With them I managed to take the first steps into illustration, and I know that I am not the only one. If I do better what I do today, it’s because of them. In order to support them and to continue enjoying their work, I subscribed digitally at the link above.
I hope I have convinced you to do the same.”

“These are things we were hoping would happen, but we didn’t engineer them,” Albeanu said.

The momentum continued even after the campaign officially ended. By the end of 2020, DoR was just shy of 5,000 members. 

What they learned

Don’t hammer the daily targets too hard. The daily targets were useful for keeping track of whether they were on target to hit their goal, but it was important to not let them demoralize the team if there was a day they didn’t reach their target, said Lunguti, who led the campaign. “It’s very important to have a project manager, [but it’s also] very important to be a cheerleader on days in which people are bored, they have problems, they have questions,” she said.

This is one of DoR’s Instagram posts sharing a progress update. It says that there are just seven days left in the campaign, and they need only 400 more members to reach their goal.

Create messaging and assets for each new milestone you hit. Lupsa said that the success of the individual social media assets for ambassadors, plus the excitement and bump in conversions they saw each time they posted that they had reached a campaign milestone made them realize – a little too late – that they should have given ambassadors assets with messages such as, “I’m one of the 1,000 people who made this happen” even though it felt “presumptuous” to do so. Each time they reached a milestone and shared it publicly, it was a huge driver of likes, shares, and new members. 

This is a full team effort, but only part of the time. Everyone on staff pitched in at some point, writing emails to newsletter subscribers asking them to become ambassadors, writing about their work for the mid-campaign message, or suggesting people who could serve as endorsers. But the entire newsroom couldn’t – and didn’t – stop their normal work. “Two to three years ago it would have been all hands on deck. It was good for morale that we didn’t pause everything,” Lupsa said, explaining that it was a sign of how much DoR has matured as an organization that most of the team could continue doing the core journalism work and that they didn’t burn the whole team out in order to achieve their goals for the campaign. 

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

Suggested subtitle: 

Limit the types of asks you make. When the campaign was in full swing, DoR paused all other marketing and focused just on asking people to become or recruit members. When the campaign ended, they quickly shifted to asking people to buy the next issue of the magazine and other products in their online store so that people didn’t get tired of hearing about membership, but DoR also didn’t stop bringing in new revenue. 

You have to build the community long before you ask them to help you. The campaign’s success came down to two things: careful planning, and the strength of support DoR already had in the community. As Albeanu noted, a lot of the support that DoR received during the campaign was unplanned. There was no way to engineer the outpouring of enthusiasm for the campaign, which resulted from a decade of DoR building relationships. 

“The moment you publish the story, you should reach out to people who might be interested. We built this habit of reaching out to people, sometimes even famous people, then we were sort of tracking who reads our stuff, who shared it, who has talked about it,” Lupsa said. All that painstaking work put them in a strong position to ask their community to show up for them during the campaign. “We were overwhelmed by how much our work has meant to people… That’s why there was no midway slump,” Lupsa said.

An outsider’s perspective is helpful. Having Lupsa, who wasn’t involved in the day-to-day planning, weigh in on the plans every two weeks helped them spot flaws in their plans and bring in fresh ideas that those who were working on the campaign every day might not have spotted. 

A successful campaign means even more change. The DoR team is busy figuring out how to support the customer service needs that 5,000 members bring with them. Previously they staffed the e-commerce parts of membership on a rotating basis, moving different journalists into the role as needed. But that won’t cut it any more. “Doubling is a great success, but… the infrastructure we previously worked with can’t handle it,” Lupsa said. “If you want to [support your members] strategically, you can’t just move a reporter into a customer service representative role for two months.”

Other resources 

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
WTF Just Happened Today is a newsletter, blog, and community chronicling the "daily shock and awe in national politics"
Location
Seattle, Washington
Founded
2017
Launched membership
2017
Percentage of revenue from membership
100 percent

When Matt Kiser launched WTF Just Happened Today (WTFJHT) in January 2017, it started as a side project to report on the first 100 days of Trump’s presidency. Early on in the site’s founding, Kiser was spending ~$500 per month (mostly on Mailchimp) to publish the newsletter and run the blog. 

About a month into running the site, Kiser decided to ask his audience for money to help offset out-of-pocket expenses. He knew he needed to raise about $4,000 per month to cover the first 100 days of his work, so he reached out over his email newsletter list to ask for donations. In just a few days, 415 people signed on to support the site. By mid-February, 540 people had signed on and Kiser was up to $3,100 per month in recurring reader support. 

That’s about when he decided to funnel that support into a membership program and quit his day-job to run WTFJHT full-time. That’s also when he realized he needed an actual budget. 

Why this is important

When it comes down to it, the costs and revenues of running a member-driven news site are what determines the longevity of the site. But figuring that out, especially in the beginning, can feel like guesswork. Kiser was only able to commit to WTFJHT once he raised enough money to feel secure enough to quit his day-job. 

Today, he has a more sophisticated sense of what he can expect each month in terms of costs and revenue (and has started to pay for freelancers and other staffing support), but in his early days, Kiser had to make strategic decisions each month based on his revenue projections. 

What they did

Three years after launching WTFJHT, Kiser has accrued a few more monthly costs – including his new, full-time salary, a budget for freelancers, and additional software and tools. Kiser is extremely transparent about the monthly costs associated with running this site. His method for managing his budget remains fairly straightforward. 

In order to be fully transparent with his readers and members, Kiser lists out all of his monthly costs on his website. See below for those costs, ranked from highest to lowest. In total and including other fluctuating costs month to month, this equals a little over $16,000 per month. 

Monthly costs:  

  • Kiser’s full-time salary:  $7,385 
  • Kiser’s risk adjustment for being a full-time contractor: $2,089, or 15% of total cost (quarterly taxes, healthcare, other unexpected costs)
  • Freelancers: $3,000
  • Podcast and Hosting: $2,000 (AWS S3 to host the daily podcast and cache the files with AWS CloudFront; and monthly stipend for podcast producer)
  • Mailchimp Email Service: at least $900 (with a 15% discount applied)
  • Other Tools: ~$320 (a GitHub subscription for hosting the code, YellowBrim for email efficiency, Cloudflare for various security and serving issues, Buffer for posting, Canva for quickly creating social images, and Zapier to automate boring tasks, among others): 
  • Hosting via Amazon S3, and CloudFlare to manage  DNS, SSL certificate, and handle caching: $125
  • NewsWhip Spike, a tool to source daily news (with a discount applied): $100
  • Subscriptions, to the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, The Atlantic, and a few others: ~$100

WTFJHT is 100 percent supported by members – Kiser doesn’t take any advertising or sponsorship dollars, which is why when he lost 150 net supporters over the past year, it was cause for some alarm. Kiser sees this churn as a part of the natural life cycle of his members, but knew it meant that he would be losing about $900 a month in income. It was time to reach out to his members again and ask for their support. 

Kiser does not like doing fundraising drives (he feels uncomfortable asking for money). But at the end of the day, this is his full-time job and he knows it needs to be done. So in July 2019, Kiser launched another membership drive with a goal of signing up 200 people to become members. Here’s what he said in the body of an email to readers: 

WTFJHT’s email newsletter appeal (Courtesy of WTFJHT)

The results 

Three days later, after sending only two reminder email to his list, Kiser’s membership drive was about a dozen people away from his goal of 200 new members. 

See below for the update he sent over his email list open to the public: 

WTFJHT’s email newsletter update on the membership drive (Courtesy of WTFJHT)

The membership drive brought Kiser back to the financial threshold that enables him to continue publishing without sustainability concerns. 

Over the years and after a few membership drives, Kiser has been able to develop a more sophisticated understanding of incoming revenue from his membership base. This clearer method of projecting revenue took time — after years of collecting data and observing member behavior.

Kiser identified the below three metrics as crucial for developing stronger revenue projections:

  1. Member conversion rate: ~1-2% (a rough percentage of WTF’s audiences — newsletter and website combined — that becomes a member) 
  2. Average monthly contribution per member: $6.17 
  3. Annual Churn Rate: 5.8%

These three numbers help Kiser determine whether he’s on track and what he can afford each month.  Here’s how he explains it: “I’ve outlined my costs and what I want to be earning on the blog. As long as the budget balances, that’s all I care about – It’s how I know I’m creating sufficient value.” 

What they learned

Always set a goal (with a reason behind it) in your fundraising drives, and communicate this to your readers and members. In the past, Kiser made membership campaigns a week long, with no specific goal. At the end, he felt like his audiences were exhausted (and he was exhausted, too, from running his own membership drive over a week where he was still providing coverage each day). Now he always offers an explanation to his readers about why he’s doing a drive (like in the above case, because WTFJHT lost some members), and he sets a clear target. Once Kiser hits the goal, he ends the drive, and starts focusing on how he can retain his new members. 

As a one-person newsroom, don’t get overwhelmed by metrics. Kiser isn’t hyper focused on all of the audience data at his disposal. As he explains: “it’s more important to focus on the basic accounting of income and expenses than any tool or app.” Kiser looks at newsletter and membership conversion rates, average contributions per member, and annual churn rate as his major pieces of “directional evidence” to determine, essentially, is this working or not? At the end of the day, it’s really about making sure revenue exceeds expenses. As long as he can predict when he’s heading for the red and can correct course with member drives, he’s all set. 

Here’s some budgeting advice for other one-person newsrooms: Kiser prefers to use the self-employed version Quickbooks to track his expenses. He likes how Quickbooks has an app and website, connects to his business credit card and bank information, and allows him to easily categorize and create “rules” for expenses that come in. Apart from the DIY version of budgeting, Kiser also uses a CPA once a year to help with his taxes. As a “disregarded entity” (a sole creator with an LLC), Kiser’s unique tax status means he prefers professional help every March to make sure he files taxes correctly. 

Key takeaways and cautionary notes 

Be honest and upfront with your audiences. It helps to share your financial situation with your readers and members, even if it borders on TMI. Kiser finds that being radically honest with his books also helps him alleviate some of his hesitations around asking for money from his readers. As he puts it, “you can see, nobody’s getting rich here!” Being transparent is also one way to build trust when asking people to optionally contribute to your work.

Know when it’s time to pack up. Kiser doesn’t know how long this model will last, and he’s prepared to be able to make a call based on how he sees his member program fluctuate in the months ahead. He’s going to keep tracking the key metrics he uses to forecast incoming revenue and whether or not he needs to ask more folks for financial support, and he knows that he doesn’t know his ceiling. As he puts it:  “I’ve long had a compact with the audience that I’ll keep doing this as long as they keep supporting me. It keeps everyone honest and there will be no doubt come a time when WTFJHT ceases to be relevant, and it’s time to pack it up.” 

Other resources 

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
A nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization, providing Michigan readers with daily, fact-driven journalism covering the state's issues, including diverse people, politics, and economics
Location
Ann Arbor, Detroit, and Lansing, Michigan
Founded
2011
Launched membership
2019
Monthly unique visitors
About 1,000,000*
Number of members
7,414
Percentage of revenue from membership
11 percent

In just two years, Michigan’s Bridge Michigan increased reader donations by 66%, increased the number of monthly donors by 54%, and grew its email list by 114% by enacting strategies. 

Bridge did this by running a series of targeted experiments at each level of the audience funnel. It set clear goals and targets for how it would define success at each level, and then enacted strategies around SEO, email newsletter growth, and more to meet those goals.

The test-and-learn mindset allowed Bridge Michigan to experiment with new content formats by expanding its email newsletters and making its coverage more search friendly, which drew in new regular audiences and attracted new members.

*Pre-coronavirus pandemic, Bridge Michigan averaged around 300,000 monthly unique page visitors.

Why this is important

Bridge Michigan’s strategies weren’t revolutionary. They were simple and straightforward. By focusing on bite-size tests focused on audience growth through SEO and audience habituation through email newsletters, Bridge was able to turn small, individual successes into a larger strategic win through increased revenue and increased membership.

Newsrooms looking to implement test-and-learn strategies for membership should start by focusing on small experiments. 

“You don’t need every unique visitor to give you money, but you need to find ways to get people to do that at each level,” Bridge Michigan’s growth strategist Bill Emkow said during a presentation at ONA19 in partnership with the Facebook Journalism Project. Bridge was a participant in the 2019 Facebook Membership Accelerator. (The Lenfest Institute partners with Facebook to administer the program and share best practices from its participants.) 

What they did

Bridge entered the Facebook Journalism Project’s Accelerator Program with some financial support from readers, but no formal strategy for growing its membership program.

The first thing Bridge Michigan had to do was define its audience funnel. Broadly, a funnel stars with occasional users and filters down to regular users and ultimately contributors.

Here’s how Bridge defined its funnel based on its reader habits and audience analytics: 

Underpinning every stage of the funnel is regular publication of high-quality coverage. Bridge publishes about 3-5 news stories per weekday. Here’s a breakdown of Bridge’s strategy at each level: 

Unique visitors to repeat visitors

At this stage, Bridge focused on SEO-friendly headlines that could get their stories in front of new audiences. 

“The most effective way to build the unique visitor base is by having more stories and more posts on the topics the audience cares about,” Emkow said. 

The next step is getting unique visitors to come back at least five times a month. 

Bridge pays close attention to its audience analytics, and if it recognizes that a particular topic is attracting a consistent audience, it will double down on that coverage. Emkow uses Google Search Console to identify which search terms are leading people to Bridge. He sends a weekly memo to the staff with the specific terms readers are using to reach the site via search.

In 2018, Michigan voters legalized recreational marijuana. Bridge noticed that the topic began trending on Google and attracting social media attention the next year, as the law was about to go into effect. 

So Bridge increased its coverage and then optimized past coverage for SEO as well. The site assigned one of its politics reporters to dive into marijuana. 

FJP’s David Grant explained how they did it:

Following SEO best practices, they linked every new marijuana story to old marijuana stories and wrote keyword-rich page titles and headlines. In the article below, notice how (circled in red) there’s a list of previously published stories before you start reading the article itself. The story’s first sentence includes the term “marijuana in Michigan.” The entire story is optimized for SEO.

However, a handful of their stories didn’t generate much readership, so the team assumed the topic was dead. 

Though Emkow argues that they ultimately pulled coverage too soon. 

“I argue that we just had three stories that didn’t connect,” he said over email. “We should’ve kept chipping away, IMHO. I think that lessons we learned from marijuana were applied during coronavirus. We just keep hammering away, and we’ve been rewarded by readers.”

Growing its email list

Email is a powerful tool for developing habit with readers, a prerequisite for converting them to members. 

“It’s letting you into their lives more,” Emkow said. “Once they let you in, you can have a conversation with them.” 

Bridge has a daily newsletter, and it encourages readers to sign up with non-intrusive sliders that pop-up after the reader has spent a few seconds on the page. It has also added a week-in-review newsletter and RSS-automated health and environment newsletters that are sent automatically the day after the site publishes a story on that topic. 

Bridge tweaks the language on the email calls-to-action depending on the source of where the reader is coming from, or the news of the moment. It previously targeted CTAs to a reader who clicked on a link via Facebook with an email sign up encouraging them to become less reliant on the social giant’s algorithms while someone who came by typing bridgemi.com into their browser will get a more general CTA.

The lefthand image is a message for a reader who arrived at Bridge after typing it into their browser. On the right is a visitor who arrived via Facebook.

Tools such as OptInMonster, which Bridge Michigan uses to power its lead generation, offer A/B testing capabilities, so you can test out different calls to action to see which is most effective based on. 

Bridge has also used Facebook lead generation ads to grow its email list. 

Conversion oriented

Your owned-and-operated platforms, such as your website, are the most important place to ask for donations. Bridge made the donation button more prominent and added a stronger call-to-action. 

The original “Donate” button

The more prominent “Donate” button Bridge uses today

It also added pop-ups to news stories and modules at the bottom of articles that encourage support. By seeing how users respond to these different call-outs, Bridge has been able to grow its donations. 

Most Bridge readers only read one story, so Bridge has three different CTAs per story to encourage membership. 

“Yes, be mission oriented, but to create sustainability be conversion oriented,” Emkow told me in an email. “To paraphrase Eminem, if you have only one shot to turn a casual reader into a paying member, what do you do?”

Sustaining members

Bridge realized that its donations page was not set up to encourage recurring contributions even though its ultimate goal was  to encourage one-time donors to contribute on a recurring basis and provide stable, predictable revenue. So they defaulted their donation pages to a monthly ask.

It also raised their default membership option. Bridge wanted to set its default membership option to $10/month, but Tim Griggs, its accelerator coach, encouraged the site to set it at $15/month. In his post, Grant explained how behavioral economics informed that decision: people are most likely to choose the default price, followed by the cheapest option. 

Griggs suggested Bridge Michigan make their default $15 per month, $10 as a second option, and any amount as a third. “It worked,” Emkow says. “We saw an immediate increase in overall monthly donations, but specifically $10 and $15 per month.”

Setting defaults is essential — you need to tell your audience what you want from them. 

“A blank field leads to confusion,” Emkow said via email. ‘How much should I give? How much do they want? What’s a lot, what’s too little?’ Eliminate confusion. The $15/month suggestion was basic behavior economics: people tend to choose the default, but the second most popular option is the second-highest price option.”

Bridge has also started re-sending fundraising emails to readers who didn’t open them. It started as a small experiment: Two days after sending a fundraising email it sent it again, and it made nearly the same amount as the first email. 

A quick note: Though many news organizations, including Bridge Michigan, use donations and membership interchangeably, we consider them two distinct engagement and revenue models with different relationships between supporters and the newsrooms

The results

Bridge has seen growth at every stage of the audience funnel. 

In 2019, toward the top of the funnel, these strategies grew its overall unique users by 35 percent to 2.4 million and its email subscribers skyrocketed by 59 percent to 13,374. 

The site generated nearly $300,000 from 3,600 members — a 45 percent increase in revenue and 54 percent increase in total members. The growth has continued in 2020. As of early September, it has 7,414 members who have contributed $436,724.

Emkow also recently launched a Facebook lead gen campaign to attract new email addresses. The ad targeted users who were similar to Bridge’s most loyal email subscribers and who resided in Michigan, the site’s target audience. It used an image from its COVID-19 tracker, and removed the words and numbers because Facebook dings images that are text heavy.

In the first two days, the ad netted Bridge 331 new email addresses with a $0.29 CPA. Over three weeks, he was able to add 2,180 new email subscribers at a cost of $.64 per email. 

Emkow initially spent $606, but raised the budget to $3,000. “I don’t want to lose the opportunity at this cost,” he said. 

What they learned

Keep track of costs. Facebook can be a valuable lead-generation tool — but the juice has to be worth the squeeze. Emkow said he’ll boost posts or use Facebook’s email lead generation tool, and then meticulously watch costs to make sure that they are staying below targeted CPAs. 

You don’t need to be an analytics expert.: Emkow is the first to admit that he’s not an expert at Google Analytics. While there are many sophisticated analytics tools, Emkow was able to glean insights by look at each level of the funnel individually and then seeing how they correlated. For example, he’d look first at overall traffic levels and then at the number of email newsletter subscribers. If he saw growth in both categories, then it would be safe to assume that readers were moving down the audience engagement funnel. 

“I’m just looking at correlations. If you’re seeing big growth in one spot and not correlating growth in other spots, there’s something you need to check out,” Emkow said. 

Pick your spots. Most membership-driven newsrooms, including Bridge, have limited resources. The site uses a combination of editorial judgment and its analytics insights to make decisions about what to test and which areas to focus on that will move its audience down the funnel. Newsrooms should 

“Be the authority on certain topics that matter to both your audience and your editorial judgment,” Emkow said. 

• Put user experience first. You don’t want to overwhelm your audience, and you should be careful about how intrusive your CTAs are. Let the data be your guide. For example, Bridge noticed that its conversion rate on on-site email pop-ups didn’t change when it changed its frequency from every one day to every three days. So users saw the pop-ups less, and Bridge still was able to grow its email list. 

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

Focus on each step of the funnel. By breaking its strategy down by steps in the funnel, Bridge was able to run concentrated experiments that focused on growing its overall audience and increasing its email list, which ultimately moved the needle on Bridge’s overall goal — growing its membership base. 

By keeping its experiments small and manageable, Bridge was able to make incremental progress that ultimately resulted in significant growth. 

Let the data guide you: It’s important to be data literate and understand what your audience analytics are telling you, but membership-driven publications need to have strong values and editorial judgement. Don’t let the data lead you to pursue audiences and stories that aren’t in line with the core membership value proposition. 

Other resources

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
A digital magazine based in Berlin that focuses on explanatory journalism and collaborations with readers
Location
Berlin, Germany
Founded
2014
Launched membership
2015
Monthly unique visitors
474,755
Number of members
13,676
Percentage of revenue from membership
86 percent

Krautreporter editor-in-chief Rico Grimm and publisher Leon Fryszer are often called “the survey guys.” That’s because surveys are baked into almost everything the newsroom does, from asking for story ideas, to gathering feedback on a product, to sourcing the crowd’s knowledge and finding experts on certain topics. Everyone in the newsroom is responsible for writing and using surveys, and has been trained in basic synthesis and segmentation to inform their editorial work. 

In 2019, Grimm and Fryszer mapped out their entire surveying framework, from what types of surveys they do to what kind of outcomes each achieves. They’ve probed how surveys can be used as a growth tactic, and even identified what surveys can’t do for them. And then they put all of that into a playbook, which MPP discusses here.

Why this is important

Krautreporter has taken the guesswork out of designing surveys.

When done well, surveys provide an abundance of knowledge and resources, including leads on stories, expertise from members, and feedback on products.

But incorporating audience member feedback as extensively as Krautreporter has can quickly overwhelm a newsroom if the process isn’t templated. Krautreporter’s survey practices are notable not just for the quality of the information they provide to the reporters, but how systematically and regularly they are done. As MPP has found, what gets routinized is what becomes culture – and if you want to become member-centric, you need a process for regularly serving them.

From the members’ perspective, filling out a survey is one of the simplest forms of participation by members. It’s valuable on its own, but it might also be the first step on a path to greater participation. You always need people to help you out by taking a survey or sitting for an interview. If someone asks you, “What can I do other than give money?”, the easiest answer is usually “Tell us what you think about this” or “Fill out this survey.”

What they did

At any point in time, Krautreporter might be running 3 to 5 surveys to collect everything from feedback on products to their members’ expertise on a specific topic. With eight reporters on payroll, this means half the newsroom is asking their audiences questions at any given time. They keep it simple, using survey templates they created in Typeform. In 2019, they took a step back and mapped out every type of survey they conduct, identifying why and how of each. 

The result was the Engaged Journalism Playbook, supported by the European Journalism Centre, which shares how they do everything from designing their surveys to evaluating the results. Krautreporter’s preferred surveying tool is Typeform mainly because it can be easily completed on mobile and integrates well with their other tools like Airtable. MPP has pulled some of the highlights below.

Vote on topics: Use surveys to ask your audience to vote on the topic they are most interested in. The results of this survey will help guide editorial coverage and the ensuring engagement tactics around the most-popular topic. A Krautreporter “topic vote” survey includes five options for topics that they could cover, and invites audience members to tell Krautreporter which they’re most interested in. When Krautreporter publishes a story on the most popular topic, there’s a built in engagement cycle: We asked, here’s how you responded, and here’s how we delivered. 

Example: Reporter Susan Mücke writes a column “A Manual For Everyday Life.” For each piece, she creates two surveys: one where she collects questions that readers want answered, and the second where she lets readers vote on the questions she collected.

Ask about the spin: Sometimes, staff will simply ask readers: what questions do you have about topic X? The answers can help them figure out what angle to take on a broad topic.

Example: Grimm did this when researching Bitcoin. He received several specific questions from audiences, but also comments like, “I don’t even know where to start,” which showed Grimm that audiences felt overwhelmed and confused by cryptocurrency as a topic generally. This feedback showed him he should first write a piece explaining Bitcoin. 

Ask about experiences and knowledge: Reporters often struggle to identify people who can humanize a story. Kautreporter asks members if they’ve had any experiences with a topic they are covering. 

Example: In response to a post in the Krautreporter Facebook group soliciting story ideas, a member wrote, “I want to understand why people eat meat even if they know animals are suffering.” Theresa Bäuerlein, the editor-in-chief, asked her newsletter subscribers (each Krautreporter journalist has their own newsletter) that question with a Typeform survey.  Bäuerlein received about 200 responses, and categorized them, which is how Krautreporter typically synthesizes survey responses. She noticed five answers come up repeatedly, so she focused on those five reasons for eating meat in her article. (Read more about this particular story in Nieman Lab.) 

Source the crowd’s knowledge: Your audience might reach out to your newsroom and ask for advice on the best way to do something, such as finding a job or studying for a test. Krautreporter will solicit their members for answers to other members’ questions, and then round up a fact-checked list of the best responses. 

Example: Their member-curated list of female authors

Ask what matters. Krautreporter is honest that they don’t always know what the most relevant information is for their readers. Sometimes they survey members to find out if they care about a particular topic. 

Example: Before the 2019 European Union election, they surveyed members about which five policy areas they wanted to learn candidates’ stances on. The results gave them a clear roadmap for their election coverage: analyze each party’s position on the five top topics. They disclosed this process to readers.

The results

In addition to answering story-specific questions and informing immediate editorial decisions, surveys also help Krautreporter develop a general sense on their members’ interests and why they read or support the newsroom, which helps them understand them as segments, rather than a monolith. 

In an interview with the research team, Grimm and Fryszer described the audience segments like this: 

Very engaged: The top 1 percent, the power members who “comment on the article, fill out every survey… we know them by name.”

Somewhat engaged: About 9 percent of their audience; the people who “join a conversation when they have something to say.” Grimm said these readers rarely comment online because “they don’t want their names out there… they have no interest in fighting.” But when they find themselves in a safe space, like a survey, and they know something about the topic, they will engage. 

The rest: The remaining 90 percent of their audience; the people who have an attachment to the brand, but are members mostly to get access to the journalism (Krautreporter has a paywall). There’s also a group of members who rarely read and “just want to be around.” 

What they learned

Surveys lead to an engagement boost with members. Krautreporter found that in the four weeks after a survey was conducted, members who participated in a survey tended to increase their reading frequency. This outperformed the newsroom’s other engagement efforts. 

Surveys are a retention tactic. Krautrerporter found that readers who participate in at least 1 survey stay on as a member for roughly four months longer than a non-survey taker. Other touchpoints show similar, but weaker, patterns. 

Surveying can fill in gaps in analytics. As many online publishers know, it’s difficult to develop a holistic sense of your audiences using metrics and analytics alone. Surveys allow the team to fill in their understanding of their different audience segments, while also allowing the reporters to test assumptions about what those segments of readers want. 

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

Surveys can be incorporated across all stages of an editorial process. At Krautreporter, reporters are asked about their plans to conduct surveys with members before they even start working on a piece. 

Surveys are great for engaging shier audience members. Most audience members don’t want to engage in comments or in public forums, but would welcome opportunities to be a part of the process less prominently. Remember to design for the less vocal audience segments, too. 

Assume you’re not reaching non-engaged members with surveys. It’s hard to get surveys in front of people who aren’t already engaged, at least through your own channels. Krautreporter acknowledges that this is a major information gap. To do that, you’ll need to get creative about your distribution, perhaps by asking another organization to share the survey or posting it to other public forums, such as a neighborhood group. 

Other resources 

Disclosure: Membership Puzzle Project supported a separate Krautreporter project in 2019 through the Membership in News Fund.

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
A Danish member-driven newsroom that seeks to add complexity and curiosity to the news
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
Founded
2016
Launched membership
2016
Number of members
17,000+
Percentage of revenue from membership
83 percent

In summer 2019, about three years after Zetland launched, the founders faced a hard truth. Despite many successes, they still weren’t profitable, and they were running out of time. Their monthly expenses totaled 1,650,000 krone (about $178,000), but monthly revenue only totaled 1,300,000 (about $140,000). CEO and co-founder Jakob Moll ran the numbers, and found that if they could grow their membership from 10,500 individuals to 14,000, they would break even.

With a clear goal in mind, they knew they needed to grow their membership, and quickly. Rather than turn to a typical marketing or acquisition campaign, they took a gamble: if they opened up about their financial situation and appealed to members’ passion for Zetland, could they enlist those members to help change their financial trajectory?

What followed was one of the most ambitious member-ambassador campaigns Membership Puzzle Project has seen. They surpassed their goal in less than a month, and at the end of 2019 they reached a major milestone: financial sustainability. 

Why this is important

Marketing is an important component of your membership growth strategy, but many newsrooms focus on that and completely forget about one of the most powerful tools they have: their most loyal members. The Membership Puzzle Project sees membership as, among many things, a way to identify your strongest supporters and incorporate them in your quest for sustainability. 

Few initiatives embody that more clearly than Zetland’s “members getting members” campaign.

The campaign wasn’t flashy. It didn’t include celebrities or any over-the-top swag. It succeeded because Zetland found the intersection point between their audience members’ passion for Zetland and their newsroom’s sustainability needs – and they were willing to offer complete transparency in exchange for members’ help. Understanding what motivates your audience members to participate and figuring out how that intersects with your needs is key.  

What they did

In June 2019, co-founder and then CEO of Zetland Jakob Moll published a piece headlined: “Here are the key figures about Zetland’s business that are usually kept secret in a business like ours.” The article laid bare Zetland’s financial books. 

Moll was blunt: “Right now, our expenses are greater than our income – in other words, the amount in our bank account is shrinking every month. If you spread out the snapshot over a whole year, we have an income of 1,300,000 a month and expenses of 1,650,000. If we had 14,000 paying members instead of 10,500, our expenses and income would balance.” 

Moll’s financial tell-all article also introduced members to a proposed solution: become an ambassador for Zetland and recruit new members. In the ambassador campaign, newly recruited members got to pay whatever they wanted for the first month of access, but after that, they would have to pay the standard monthly membership fee of ~$14 a month. Here’s what this process looked like in practice:

They recruited “ambassadors” from their current member base. Ambassador recruitment officially started with Moll’s financial-tell-all article, which included a sign-up form for ambassadors that first verified the respondent was already a Zetland member. The sign-up form was also the process for onboarding ambassadors and included questions about how the ambassador preferred to recruit their new members. Over the next two weeks, more than 1,000 people across Denmark signed up to become ambassadors.  

They equipped their new ambassadors for both digital and print recruitment campaigns. When a member became an ambassador, Zetland gave them a unique signup page URL that included their name. The URL brought potential new members to the pay-what-you-want sign-up form. Zetland also gave ambassadors the option of postcards or posters to spread the word offline. They shipped out more than 20,000 postcards and 2,000 posters with ambassadors’ personal codes for the ambassadors to share when the campaign launched. 

They officially launched their ambassador campaign on Aug. 6, 2019. The ambassadors started recruiting new members by sharing a recruitment form with a video of Moll introducing himself and Zetland’s mission. Then, the reader was shown the dominant call-to-action, which was the pay-what-you want box. 

Courtesy of Zetland

When a new member signed up, Zetland sent them a long, personal welcome email from Lea Korsgaard, the editor-in-chief. They frequently reminded their readers, members and ambassadors that “this is your campaign, it’s not ours.”

Membership Puzzle Project shared additional details about the execution in its 2019 case study of the campaign.

The results

Zetland’s ambassador campaign launched on Aug. 6 and formally ended on Sept. 6. Their goal was to add 1,400 members to their then-10,500 members. They reached that goal in a week. In September, they passed 2,500 new members (totaling 13,000 members). By the end of the campaign, they surpassed 14,000 members. 

That 14,000 number is significant because at 14,000 members, their newsroom broke even and started making a small profit. About six months after the campaign officially ended, Moll reported to Membership Puzzle that they are “moving toward 15,000 members.” So far 346 of those original ambassadors have signed up to be ambassadors year-round. 

The pay-what-you-want model for the first month was also a success. New Zetland members didn’t go for the lowest possible payment. (On average, new Zetland members decided to pay a little bit less than the equivalent of $9, when the sticker price for the first month of membership is equivalent to $6.50.)

In addition to volunteering to help recruit new members, more than 500 Zetland members also volunteered to help with member-driven editorial projects in the coming months. 

What they learned

Look to recruit people who are willing to pay some amount for membership. Zetland ran its first ambassador campaign in 2018. It brought in 700 new members, but many of those members didn’t stick. Only half of them even logged on to Zetland after the campaign ended. Moll believes that giving free access sent the wrong message to their audiences. In 2019, Zetland focused on recruiting members who understood the value of high-quality journalism — the folks who were willing to pay for it — and it worked. The members recruited during their 2019 campaign have a retention rate that mirrors that of Zetland’s overall membership.

Be honest about your financial situation and what you need from your members. Zetland found their ambassadors eager to jump in and help the newsroom reach financial sustainability. The radically honest articles published prior to the ambassador campaign’s launch (including how many more members, exactly, they needed to survive) helped mobilize their current members into action.

Set up your ambassadors for success, and say thank you often. The Zetland team worked hard to make their ambassadors feel special, empowering them to recruit new members either digitally with their personalized URLs or manually with postcards. Ambassadors also received small gifts like stickers and packets of plant seeds. The Zetland team was sure to say thank you often, and to keep their ambassadors updated on the newsroom’s progress and success along the way.

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

Find ways to harness members’ passion for your organization. Ambassadorship taps into members’ passion for your work – one of the six key motivations MPP heard when analyzing responses from hundreds of supporters of news organizations about why they gave their support.  Members motivated by the chance to show some love for your mission are proud of their affinity with your organization and want people to know about it. 

Although only a small percentage of your members will likely respond to your call for ambassadors (the 90/10/1 rule is that 90 percent of members will just consume the product, 10 percent will interact with you, and 1 percent of that 10 percent will become core contributors), that small percentage can have a transformative impact.

Other resources

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
A nonprofit, statewide newsroom that does watchdog reporting on state government, politics, consumer affairs, business and public policy.
Location
Vermont, U.S.
Founded
2009
Launched membership
2016
Monthly unique visitors
725,000
Number of members
8,400
Percentage of revenue from membership
22 percent

VTDigger is a statewide news organization committed to providing watchdog journalism to Vermont. Membership has been a key part of their revenue mix for years, and their spring membership drive is one of the most important revenue drivers they have. 

They were gearing up for their spring 2020 membership drive as coronavirus arrived in the U.S., locking down much of the country and causing a tremendous economic shock. They couldn’t afford to skip the membership drive, but they knew they needed to change it dramatically to respect the financial and medical concerns their readers suddenly faced. 

Why this is important

This guide is being published in the middle of the coronavirus pandemic. The Membership Puzzle Project team has sought to recognize the challenges the pandemic has introduced while focusing on advice and case studies that will remain relevant when people are able to come together again in person. 

While this example from VTDigger is specific to coronavirus, their insights can be applied to launching a membership appeal during any number of sensitive times, such as a local tragedy.  And while it’s not recommended to constantly change your membership program offering, which can get confusing for members and potential members, a time-limited, mission-aligned benefit can give a boost without detracting from the value of the program itself.

Having a sense of what your members and most engaged readers value about you can help your organization identify what types of benefits might resonate and be easy to implement on a short-term basis.

What they did

Although readers can become a member of VTDigger at any point in time, VTDigger focuses heavily on two membership drives a year, typically one near the end of the calendar year and one in the spring.

Their spring 2020 membership drive came up as the coronavirus pandemic was hitting the U.S. They couldn’t afford not to host the drive, but as they saw the economic fallout, it did not feel right to follow their typical template, a celebratory mix of appeals to the importance of local journalism and member benefits. 

They quickly made the following changes to their plan:

  • Put the incentives they typically offer on the shelf (such as a New York Times subscription, raffle drawings, and swag, such as hats) 
  • Switched from a public financial target to a public target for number of donations – 3,000 (this focused it less on money and more about joining a community) 
  • Partnered with a local glove-making company who had switched to manufacturing cloth masks to donate one mask to a local hospital for every donation made

On April 1, they launched the drive with a letter from founder and editor Anne Galloway.

One of the membership appeals published during VTDigger’s spring membership drive (Courtesy of VTDigger)

In subsequent appeals, VTDigger referred to the campaign as a “mask drive,” rather than a membership drive. This put the focus more on how VTDigger was helping Vermont residents, rather than VTDigger’s journalism, which is usually what membership drives focus on. 

In one of their appeals, Galloway also offered further insight into the decision to stop offering many of their benefits in the short-term. 

One of the final messages sent during VTDigger’s spring 2020 membership drive (Courtesy of VTDigger)

The results

It was a close call – they sent out an appeal on April 30 that they were still 450 masks away from their goal of 3,000  – but they reached 3,050 donations, allowing them to donate 3,000 masks to hospitals across the state. In their “thank you” note to donors on May 1, VTDigger detailed how many masks went to each Vermont hospital. 

The drive raised $291,000 – $6,000 more than their goal for the drive they had planned before COVID-19 arrived.

They also noticed a few interesting member behaviors, Peters said. 

  • One member made five separate donations in order to donate five distinct masks
  • They saw a 30 percent increase in members in the southern Vermont city of Rutland, and a sizable increase in members across all of southern Vermont. Many of those new members thanked VTDigger for donations to specific hospitals in those areas.
  • Nearly 40% of the donations came from out-of-state donors. The percentage of donations from out-of-state is usually in the single digits.
  • Readers assumed that swag was still part of the plan and they received messages from new member testimonials “imploring” VTDigger not to send those items 

They applied those learnings to raise funds again later in the year. Back in 2019, they found out that they had been selected to host a Report for America journalist to cover southern Vermont. But to make it happen, VTDigger needed to raise their own matching funds. They designed a membership campaign around that target, asking people to become members or increase their contribution to make reporting on southern Vermont possible. They launched the campaign on June 1 and wrapped it up on June 7, raising the required $11,500 needed in a week, and not just from people living in the southern part of the state who wanted more local coverage. 

What they learned

Swag has a time and place – and this wasn’t it. Offering typical swag like a tote bag would have missed the mark completely and potentially alienated their members and potential members (as evidenced by the requests from new members not to send swag). The mask campaign worked because it met both VTDigger’s needs – finding a way to hold their spring membership drive – and their readers’ needs – the desire to feel like they were doing something to help Vermont during a difficult moment. 

You have more than one chance to pitch your members. Although the average contribution was lower – the average monthly contribution was 20 cents lower than the spring 2019 campaign and the average annual contribution was $48 lower – VTDigger says the most important thing for them is that they are now members. When the economic recovery begins, VTDigger will begin thinking about how to approach those members about increasing their contribution.

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

Read the room. The pandemic caused financial hardship not just for news organizations who lost events and advertising revenue, but for huge swathes of the communities that they serve. If you’re going to design a membership campaign around a negative news moment, you’ll have to get the tone and social contract right – and consider ways that you can do good for the community at the same time.

Other resources