Newsroom overview

Who They Are
A nonprofit, non-partisan, and digital-only newsroom dedicated to in-depth news and reporting on public policy, government, and politics in Connecticut
Location
Hartford, Connecticut
Founded
2010
Membership program launched
2019
Monthly unique visitors
~ 250,000
Number of members
1,950
Percentage of revenue coming from membership
10 percent

Each year, as the Connecticut legislative session comes to a close, The Connecticut Mirror (which also goes by CT Mirror) kicks off one of its biggest and most successful annual fundraisers: The Gavel Give.

The Gavel Give is an aggressive 36-hour-long fundraising event that coincides with the end of the state’s legislative session. Although the timing of The Gavel Give changes slightly each year, the concept stays the same. The CT Mirror, with a 20-person staff dedicated to reporting on public policy, government and politics, uses the opportunity to remind readers about the value of their work and asks them over and over again to support future legislative reporting. The first time they ran Gavel Give in 2021, they raised about $32,000. In 2022, they raised about $39,000. 

Why this is important

The final days of Connecticut’s legislative session mark a time when CT Mirror publishes dozens more stories and sees almost twice as many visitors than usual. Kyle Constable, CT Mirror’s director of membership and digital innovation, said they decided to “channel the natural energy” that comes from the annual event and turn it into a fundraising opportunity.

Most newsrooms have similarly predictable moments of elevated audience attention. Gavel Give offers a replicable way that other small and medium-sized newsrooms can leverage intense spikes in audience interest — not just once, but repeatedly, as CT Mirror has. 

This case is particularly useful for newsrooms without dedicated membership staff. It can be hard to sustain a weeks-long membership campaign on a tiny team while still maintaining editorial operations, but reorienting staff around a 36-hour membership sprint might be more feasible.

What they did

Because Gavel Give happens almost exclusively over email, preparation begins months ahead of time with an effort to grow their email list. Each year, as part of a sprint with News Revenue Hub, Constable tests and updates CT Mirror’s newsletter sign-up calls to action on their website, including tweaking the language, location, and design of CTAs. “We want something that looks and feels different each year,” Constable explained. These small changes have a big impact: Their newsletter subscribers continue to grow, despite the fact that they regularly clean out inactive users.

CT Mirror has three core newsletters — their daily morning briefing, daily afternoon briefing, and weekly Sunday roundup — with around 15,000; 13,000; and 16,000 subscribers, respectively. They send all campaign emails to anyone who is signed up for any of their newsletters.

A match from a major donor is another key component of the campaign. A few months ahead of the inaugural Gavel Give, CT Mirror’s publisher reached out to one of the organization’s biggest donors for support. “We asked for a triple match,” Constable said, “because we really wanted to make this a notable event.” The donor agreed, and returned in 2022 to offer the same triple-match contribution.

Constable does as much work on the campaign ahead of time as possible, including designing, writing and scheduling countdown emails, and creating graphics that can be easily replicated and updated.

Their first campaign outreach for 2022 went out a few days before the fundraiser: a countdown postcard to their readers announcing their goal: to raise $36,000 in 36 hours. Forty-eight hours before kickoff, they sent a reminder email. They sent another reminder 24 hours ahead of the campaign.

The first official campaign email went at noon on Day 1 of Gavel Give. Over two days, CT Mirror sent eight fundraising emails, including appeals from reporters and editors, and updates on campaign progress. They also let readers know that all Gavel Give donations would be triple matched by an anonymous donor, something that added to the urgency of the event. Each of those emails (including the 100% email, which netted roughly another $1,000) brought in additional donations from readers.

Here’s a breakdown of the emails:

  • Email 1:
    • Sent: Monday, May 2 at 12 p.m.
    • Subject line: The Gavel Give starts in 48 hours!
    • Content: A static image reminder that the campaign starts in two days
  • Email 2:
    • Sent: Tuesday, May 3 at 12 p.m.
    • Subject line: 24 hours until The Gavel Give begins!
    • Content: A static image reminder that the campaign starts in one day
  • Email 3:
    • Sent: Wednesday, May 4 at 12 p.m.
    • Subject line: The Gavel Give STARTS NOW!
    • Content: A static image reminder about the campaign and triple-match
  • Email 4:
    • Sent: Wednesday, May 4 at 2 p.m. (and re-sent to non-openers the next day at 9:30 a.m.)
    • Subject line: Connecticut’s budget realities
    • Content: CT Mirror’s role in providing context around the state’s fiscal crisis 
    • Signed by: Keith Phaneuf, state budget reporter
  • Email 5:
    • Sent: Wednesday, May 4 at 7 p.m (and re-sent to non-openers the next day at 10:30 a.m.)
    • Subject line: How many reporters still cover the state Capitol?
    • Content: Unlike other states, Connecticut’s number of statehouse reporters has stayed the same — namely because CT Mirror has grown
    • Signed by: Elizabeth Hamilton, executive editor
  • Email 6:
    • Sent: Wednesday, May 4 at 8 a.m.
    • Subject line: The first milestone: 50%!
    • Content: A static image showing halfway progress to the campaign goal
  • Email 7:
    • Sent: Thursday, May 5 at 11:45 a.m. (re-sent to non-openers at 2:30 p.m.)
    • Subject line: In Connecticut, 2022 is just getting started
    • Content: The legislative session just ended, which means it’s time to shift gears to election season
    • Signed by: Mark Pazniokas, Capitol bureau chief
  • Email 8:
    • Sent: Thursday, May 5 at 1:30 p.m. (re-sent to non-openers at 5:45 p.m.)
    • Subject line: Getting closer …
    • Content: A static image showing 75% progress to the goal, and an ask to give
  • Email 9:
    • Sent: Thursday, May 5 at 7:15 p.m. (re-sent to non-openers at 9:30 p.m.)
    • Subject line: 90%
    • Content: A static image announcing “SO CLOSE,” and an ask to give
  • Email 10:
    • Sent: Thursday, May 5 at 11:00 p.m.
    • Subject line: 100 PERCENT!
    • Content: A static image thanking readers and inviting them to still donate

Throughout the campaign, Constable posted progress updates on Twitter and Facebook.

A dynamic progress bar also sat at the top of CT Mirror’s homepage throughout the fundraiser, yet another touchpoint for readers to learn about the challenge.

The dynamic progress bar (Courtesy of CT Mirror)

CT Mirror first introduced The Gavel Give in 2021. Their goal was to raise $30,000; they raised $32,339. In 2022, they increased their goal to $36,000. They raised $39,186.

The results

In 2021, 306 readers contributed to the campaign, including 67 people who were new CT Mirror donors. In 2022, 283 donors contributed to Gavel Give, including 72 new donors — a little over 25% of all donors. The majority of Gavel Give gifts are one-time donations.

Almost 100 people unsubscribed from CT Mirror’s mailing list during the 2022 campaign. “Do we hate to see them go? Of course,” Constable shared. “But if a hundred people off the email list means $40,000 in new revenue, I’m going to take that trade-off every day of the week.” 

Constable also created a way for newsletter subscribers to skip Gavel Give emails. Starting with the 48-hour preview, all campaign messages include a clear opt-out message and link in the footer. The message read: “Already donated or want to opt out of Gavel Give emails? Update your preferences to skip these emails specifically.” Around 100 readers took advantage of that option.

This isn’t the only time that CT Mirror fundraises. Constable said that The CT Mirror has a “mindset of constant campaigning.” They send out regular donation-request emails that feature standout stories and other newsroom updates, participate in NewsMatch, and look for other fundraising campaign opportunities throughout the year. 

“So much of the fundraising mentality is about the long-run,” Constable explained. “We’ll take the $10 monthly donor over the one-time $100 gift, because after 12 months, it’s gonna be $120 instead of $100 and so on.” 

With The Gavel Give, though, they can activate a different set of potential donors, ones who might not ever become a recurring supporter. “Different people respond to different things,” Constable added. “The Gavel Give helps us tap into those readers who get caught up in the energy of the moment and make that financial gift.”

In the end, it’s all about balance. The combination of steady membership program growth, the end-of-year NewsMatch campaign, and The Gavel Give creates “a solid blueprint for the year,” he explained.

What they learned

Build your mailing list. Constable credits much of the success of The Gavel Give to “the constant work that we are doing to grow our email newsletter list.” That work includes regularly refreshing calls-to-action, or CTAs, on CT Mirror’s website and launching new newsletters. “If we were not always adding new people to our email list, then we would have no new donors,” Constable explained.

Create a sense of urgency. By announcing a goal to reach within a certain timeframe and offering a triple match for donations made during that period, there’s palpable excitement. And through progress-bar graphics, emails from reporters and editors, and social posts, the newsroom constantly reminds readers of the goal, the deadline, and how close they are to both of those things. “The more you can create the feeling that this is an event,” Constable explained, “the more successful it’s going to be.”

Identify room for improvement. Constable and the CT Mirror team always take time after a campaign like The Gavel Give to reflect on how the fundraiser went and what they could improve next time. During the retrospective meeting, the staff discusses what worked and what didn’t; how the fundraiser felt workload-wise; whether they hit their revenue goal; and what they could do differently next year. One takeaway from 2021 was how successful the Gavel Give countdown-timer-turned-progress-bar performed on their homepage. In 2022, after CT Mirror relaunched its site, Constable’s first priority was to rebuild that bar for the next campaign.

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

Be prepared. Creating all of the campaign assets ahead of time makes a huge difference. In the weeks leading up to The Gavel Give, Constable crafts emails, designs campaign graphics, and streamlines as many processes as possible. “At the end of the day, The Gavel Give campaign is a ridiculous amount of emails in a very short amount of time, and to create each and every one of those emails takes time,” Constable said. “But if you can find ways to increase efficiency, then you’ve got a winner.”

Be aggressive. Sending eight fundraising emails in two days is a lot, but it’s part of running a successful deadline-driven campaign. Overall, Constable’s been surprised how receptive most readers are to the volume of messages during The Gavel Give. “It’s not that you can’t send too many emails; you can but you can send a lot more emails than you think you could before you’ve sent too many emails,” he said.

Be yourself. Constable said that most newsrooms can find campaign opportunities. “You know what your big moments are in the year,” he offered. “You don’t have to overthink it. Just go where your readers are and build something around the natural momentum.”

Other resources 

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
A nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization, providing Michigan readers with daily, fact-driven journalism covering the state's issues, including diverse people, politics, and economics
Location
Ypsilanti, Detroit, and Lansing, Michigan
Founded
2011
Membership program launched
2019
Monthly unique visitors
655,000
Number of members
9,000
Percentage of revenue coming from membership
24 percent

With just over 9,000 members in November 2022, Bridge Michigan has one of the largest local membership programs in the U.S. (excluding public radio membership). Their annual rolling retention rate has typically been about 70%, a little over the median rate at News Revenue Hub, of whom they are a client. 

Although Bridge Michigan’s year-end campaign in 2021 was very successful, they were churning members much more than they were used to, according to membership and engagement director Amber DeLind. Retention was down from about 70% to the low 60s. At the same time, growth had slowed. As a result, Bridge Michigan’s number of members was flat for close to eight months. 

They knew they needed to start trying some new things to address that. Bridge Michigan embraced a test-and-learn mindset years ago, and they kicked that approach into gear. This case study will walk through some of the new membership offerings they tried that brought them back to a 73% retention rate in 2022. 

Why this is important

Like many U.S.-based newsrooms, Bridge Michigan struggled with a post-pandemic and post-Trump plateau. 

Continuing to grow and retain members isn’t something that happens passively, especially when a membership program gets past its buzzy first couple years. Membership is not a “set it and forget it” product. 

Even if a newsroom isn’t seeing a plateau or rising churn, they should still be continually looking for ways to increase the value of membership for their members. This case study offers several examples of ways to diversify your membership offering to retain the members you have and attract new members who might not be interested in your core product. 

What they did

Three strategies, coupled with rising interest in political news leading up to the midterms, helped Bridge Michigan get back to the same growth and retention rates they were seeing before the pandemic: 

  1. They implemented fresh newsletter strategies that gave them a larger pool of potential members to reach by email.
  2. They launched a book club that is still running today.
  3. They offered time-limited incentives. 

New newsletters

The Bridge Michigan team recognized that if they wanted to grow their membership program, they also needed to draw more people into the mid-funnel — and in order to reach people that they had not yet managed to reach, they probably needed to offer a different editorial product. 

They hypothesized that although comprehensive coverage of Michigan is what they’re known for, there might be readers who don’t want a general interest newsletter but would be interested  in a more niche topic. In September 2021, they launched bimonthly newsletters focused on topics such as business, health, and the environment.  

During their summer and fall membership campaigns, they sent specific appeals to these newsletter lists, highlighting the coverage they had done on the beat that year. In 2022, they also held at least two virtual events related to each beat in order to give high-interest readers an opportunity to engage more deeply with the reporting. 

Book club

As the full scope of the pandemic came into view, Bridge Michigan canceled all its upcoming in-person events in March 2020..Still, they wanted to find a way to connect with readers. Why not try a virtual book club?

They resurfaced an early pandemic article highlighting several Michigan–authored books and invited readers to vote on which of those books they wanted to read first. Bridge Michigan then sent out an email announcing the book, told people where they could get it, and set a May 2020 date for the Zoom discussion.

The author joined and 75 people showed up — a “shockingly large” group, DeLind said. Buoyed by overwhelmingly good feedback, they immediately began planning the next meeting. 

In planning, they surveyed attendees, asking questions such as: 

  • What did you like best?
  • What did you like least?
  • What suggestions do you have for improving? 

They also invited Bridge Michigan readers to suggest books for the book club, using the following criteria: the author needed to be from Michigan, the book needed to be about Michigan, or the book needed to be on a topic related to Michigan. 

DeLind used her membership budget, normally allocated for in-person events, to purchase digital versions of the book club books, which members could request for free. They still offer this popular perk today.

Time-limited incentives

Bridge Michigan tried out digital contributor rewards for the first time in March 2020, giving new members who gave $120 or more a year (on a monthly or annual basis) a free one-year subscription to The New York Times or Reason, a center-right magazine. (DeLind credits Sam Hoisington, their former program manager at News Revenue Hub, with the idea.)

Bridge Michigan has since offered this as a benefit four other times: in May 2020; their December 2020 year-end campaign; their December 2021 year-end campaign; and to only highly-engaged readers in February 2022. Although they don’t have the budget to offer this sign-up benefit all the time, DeLind says that’s not necessarily an issue — she thinks that it’s a more effective benefit when offered during specific times of year. 

Courtesy of Bridge Michigan

The results

None of these strategies would have been enough on their own to restore Bridge Michigan’s growth and retention to its steady pre-pandemic levels. But together, coupled with more standard growth and retention tactics, Bridge Michigan is back at a 73% retention rate. 

The niche newsletters they began offering in 2021 have exceeded expectations. They had a goal of 5,000 subscribers for each of their five newsletters (Business Watch, Education Watch, Environment Watch, Health Watch, and Politics Watch), and they’ve reached that for all of them. Politics Watch and Health Watch reached double the goal. They plan to launch beat-specific membership drives in 2023. 

As of August 2022, they’ve held 13 virtual book club discussions with an average of 100 people at each discussion (about 75 percent of them members), including the author. They’ve had 1,613 people participate in the book club. They’ve received 7,165 requests from members for the free book downloads. 

They also launched a Facebook group to discuss the book, which has topped 600 participants. 

In their member onboarding survey, they ask people why they became a member and “the book club is far and away the biggest reason they join,” DeLind says — even though the book club isn’t member-only. And when DeLind asked members what benefit they enjoyed most in their 2021 year-end survey, the free e-book benefit was the most popular benefit across all tiers, after “I don’t need any benefits, I just want to support your journalism.”

Membership is promoted aggressively through the book club. First, it’s the only way to get the free download. They also include a membership ask in the book club announcement, the “thank you” they send afterwards, and the recording that they share with all of their readers. They’ve raised $9,000 in membership revenue from book club callouts so far. 

“I keep anticipating that interest in this will wane as people return to normal life,” DeLind says. So far, that hasn’t been the case. “It’s additive to your interest in Bridge because you like to read, but it’s enough removed that it feels like an escape,” DeLind said when hypothesizing why book club interest remains high.

Meanwhile, of the 321 donations made during a contributor-rewards campaign, 199 of them are still active. Seventy-three percent of the people who joined during a contributor-rewards gift period have stayed, compared with 67 percent for all members in the same time frame. 

What they learned 

Readers are looking for levity, too. DeLind says that the book club’s success showed them that not all membership benefits or reader engagement activities have to be directly related to their journalism. Sometimes being “fun” is enough. By focusing on books about Michigan or by authors from Michigan, they’ve been able to tap into state pride, too. 

You can offer benefits that aren’t about you. The New York Times and Reason subscriptions don’t have any connection to Bridge Michigan. But they knew their readers were interested in both state and national news and offering the subscriptions would not cost Bridge Michigan much to offer. (The full-price Reason subscriptions are $14 and they got the New York Times subscription at a steep discount of $25 each. Bridge Michigan taps their budget for membership benefits to cover the costs.)

Keep things interesting. It’s hard to keep existing members engaged and hook new members if you’re sending them the same messages over and over again – and it’s a lot easier to come up with fresh messaging if you have something new to talk about, even if it’s small. From the book club to the beat-related events, there’s always something new for Bridge Michigan to tell members and potential members about.

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

You need to have the basics in place first. Creative tactics like these aren’t worth it unless you’re maximizing the more standard strategies, such as a strong newsletter onboarding series, a strong member onboarding series, and an “always be fundraising” mindset that includes multiple campaigns a year and tailored membership asks everywhere you can put them. Bridge Michigan has all of these in place, ensuring that it avoids easily preventable membership losses and is capturing every potential member that it can. 

When growth slows, you might have to do some things differently. Until 2021, Bridge Michigan’s membership growth happened primarily through its free general newsletter. That’s still a steady source of membership growth, but the team correctly recognized that to serve other audiences, it might need a more niche product. You can start small, with just one newsletter or similar product on a beat that attracts higher-than-average readership.

Other resources

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
An independent media organization reporting and writing from the traditionally underrepresented south of India
Location
Bangalore, India
Founded
2014
Membership program launched
2020
Monthly unique visitors
10 million
Number of members
1,700
Percentage of revenue coming from membership
10 percent

The News Minute (TNM) launched in 2014 to cover the news in India from the South Indian perspective. They got a grant to launch their membership program in 2020, and for a while they thought that would be their primary source of audience revenue. 

But as they developed the membership program, navigating technical challenges that made recurring payments almost impossible and seeking ways to offer a meaningful member experience, they also ran occasional crowdfunding campaigns for specific editorial projects. 

Those campaigns have activated readers who they had tried unsuccessfully to convert to membership. Over time, TNM’s membership team – composed of Navin Sigamany, Manager – Revenue and Product; Ramanathan Subramanian, Head of Revenue and Product; and CEO Vignesh Vellore – realized that crowdfunding is not just a bridge to a membership program. It can be an ongoing source of revenue that coexists with membership. This case study will share how they got there. 

Why this is important

Many newsrooms test the viability of membership by running a crowdfunding campaign first – a sort of temperature check on whether audience members appreciate their work enough to financially support it. Once they get the membership program infrastructure in place, most newsrooms stop crowdfunding campaigns. 

MPP doesn’t necessarily recommend trying to maintain two audience revenue streams side by side. It can be logistically challenging and confusing to the potential supporter. 

But The News Minute did it in the reverse order, launching membership first and crowdfunding as a supplementary revenue stream. They have now maintained a membership program and several crowdfunding campaigns side by side for more than a year. 

This case study will offer insight into how a member-driven newsroom can also collect financial support through crowdfunding. It might be particularly useful for newsrooms operating in environments in which recurring payments are a challenge. 

What they did

News Minute has designed three ways by which people can become a financial supporter.

They began by launching a membership program in April 2020, with two types of membership, followed by three crowdfunding campaigns in 2021. 

A membership program

In 2019, Chennai and Kerala faced catastrophic flooding. Members of the TNM community helped connect relief efforts with people who needed them and affected people with their family members in other parts of the country.  

Their volunteerism got the TNM membership team (then led by Ragamalika Karthikeyan, Editor, Special Projects & Experiments), CEO Vignesh Vellore, and Editor-in-Chief Dhanya Rajendran thinking about other ways they could engage this community and leverage that engagement for audience revenue. They launched a membership program in April 2020 with the help of a Google News Initiative grant. 

Recurring payments are technically challenging in India due to local banking regulations, so members pay on a six-month or annual basis. They offered a fairly typical member experience of member-only newsletters, the opportunity to attend a monthly editorial meeting where they planned stories, and access to member-only events, most of which have happened on Zoom because of the pandemic. They also launched a Discourse community where members could talk to each other and their staff and made their app members-only. 

You can learn more about The News Minute’s member experience in the 2021 MPP report, “Building healthy member communities: Lessons from newsrooms around the world.” 

A membership tier for the Indian diaspora

The Chennai rains also showed TNM that many of its readers lived outside India and would be in a better position than those in India to financially support TNM. They decided to try and build a membership experience specific to the needs of diaspora readers.. 

Because recurring payments are easier with bank accounts outside India, TNM offered diaspora members the option of monthly payments. They also offered them access to a “help desk” through which members could ask TNM staff for help with things that were harder to manage from outside the country, such as help identifying doctors for aging parents in India or lawyers to help out on specific legal issues.

Crowdfunding for specific editorial initiatives 

As they approached the one-year anniversary of their membership program, TNM started taking a closer look at crowdfunding. Other publishers in their market, such as Newslaundry, had successfully run single-issue crowdfunding campaigns. TNM also had a few members who would not open any emails from TNM and would never attend any events, but would give money at every opportunity, which showed TNM that, for some people, the member relationship might not matter much. 

They decided to test crowdfunding with a small, generic campaign in February 2021 for TNM’s birthday. They received almost 100 payments in just 48 hours. The velocity of the response surprised and encouraged them. “We thought, if 100 folks are ready to give some money without thinking twice about it for our birthday, surely we will be able to get more people to give money about specific issues that are close to them,” Sigamany said. 

Getting a crowdfunding campaign off the ground was relatively easy from a technical standpoint. Because of the membership program, which was almost a year old at that point, TNM already had the infrastructure in place to receive money from readers. Encouraged by the birthday campaign, they ran three major, issue-based crowdfunding initiatives in 2021. 

The first was pegged to the April 2021 local elections in the states of Tamil Nadu and Kerala offered that opportunity. They drafted a comprehensive coverage plan – senior journalists on the campaign trail, on-the-ground reports, a focus on the issues that mattered to each of the constituencies – and ran a six-week campaign to raise funds to support the coverage.

In June 2021, they launched the eight-week COVID-19 reporting project, which has been their most ambitious – and successful – crowdfunding campaign to date. Their campaign launch announcement detailed the work they had done for the first 15 months of the pandemic and laid out what more they could do with dedicated reader support. During the campaign they sent periodic email updates to those who had contributed, letting them know the stories that had been published, and continued to share major stories with the campaign supporters after the campaign ended. 

For the final issue-based campaign of 2021, they focused on the concept of cooperative federalism or the sharing of power between the state and federal governments. This is a hot topic in South India, where four of the five states are led by opposition parties and are often at odds with the federal government. This campaign ran for 10 weeks.

TNM launched a newsletter for the project and sent an update every week on the latest stories and what they would be covering next. Every update also included a request to support their continued reporting on the topic, as did their member newsletters. 

Since 2021, they’ve also done a series of smaller crowdfunding campaigns around anniversaries or lawsuits from the government. 

Applying a crowdfunding approach to membership 

Before these crowdfunding campaigns, they had never run a high-intensity membership drive. 

In 2021, torrential rains in Chennai once again caused catastrophic flooding. Three-quarters of the city was submerged, but national media was barely covering it, Sigamany recalls. 

The staff realized they needed to be there. TNM is headquartered in Bangalore, in neighboring state Karnataka, and TNM was founded to cover South India from a South Indian perspective. 

They got a team on the ground and started asking for people to become members to help sustain their comprehensive coverage, ultimately running the campaign for three weeks, while their staff was on the ground covering the floods and the recovery. They chose to use the campaign to build membership because it meant they could use their existing membership tools. (The other crowdfunding campaigns had been run fairly manually.) 

The results

After six crowdfunding campaigns and more than two years of maintaining a membership program with tiers for members in India and in the diaspora, Sigamany shared three topline results that we’ll detail below. 

Membership is unlikely to be TNM’s primary source of audience revenue – but it offers other value.

As of November 2022, the News Minute had 1,700 members. They’ve had a total of 5,000 members since 2020, but more than half of their members have churned.

Recurring payments are very hard in India and Sigamany spends hours a week manually contacting lapsed TNM members to try and get a payment back on file. He also hypothesizes that some have quit because the member experience isn’t what they expected.

Sigamany now thinks about members differently. They contribute other things that can be as hard to come by as money: constructive feedback, time and sustained attention. 

He shared multiple examples of members weighing in at editorial meetings and through sneak peeks at features that helped stories and products succeed. They are significantly more engaged than anyone else that reads TNM’s journalism, including crowdfunding contributors. Given the comparative financial success of the crowdfunding campaigns (more on that below), Sigamany now thinks of members primarily as a sounding board with whom they can test out new things before rolling them out to the broader audience, ensuring a better final product.  

“That type of information is usually very difficult to get. [With non-members] you have to follow up multiple times,” he said. “That’s where the big value of membership comes in. Even if ultimately it ends up being maybe 30 percent of overall audience revenue, the engagement is where it becomes crucial, especially when you’re building out new offerings.”

Going forward, they’ll put more effort into member stewardship to maintain that relationship.  

Other changes they made: 

  • They killed a member-only arts newsletter that was produced by an external agency. It had a few superfans but never took off. Sigamany hypothesizes that readers didn’t think of TNM as a place to go for arts coverage. 
  • They abandoned their member-only community on Discourse and moved it to Facebook, realizing it was too hard to get people to move to a new platform just for The News Minute. 

Diaspora members didn’t care about special benefits. 

Between 10 and 20 percent of TNM’s members are Non-Resident Indians (NRIs), an official government designation for Indians living overseas. But fewer than 10 people have accessed the help desk. The opportunity to pay monthly instead of biannually is similarly underused. Fewer than 20 percent of NRI members have opted for the monthly billing option.

The lesson for TNM was that diaspora members didn’t need anything special. 

“Every time we tried to do something that was focused on the diaspora, we didn’t get the interest we thought that we would get,” Sigamany said. They interviewed dozens of their diaspora readers about what would make their TNM experience better and “it kept coming back to the stuff we’re doing already”, he said. 

TNM still offers the help desk and monthly billing but aren’t planning to invest any further in differentiating the NRI member experience.

Crowdfunding campaigns are where they think will get most of their future audience revenue

TNM ran three major crowdfunding campaigns in 2021. 

  • April 2021, local elections: About 100,000 rupees from about 100 people
  • June-July 2021, COVID-19 Reporting Project: About 500,000 rupees from around 300 people
  • Late 2021, cooperative federalism: About 150,000 rupees from about 100 people

For context, the total of these efforts was about 2 percent of their 2021 revenue, while membership brought in about 10 percent. Once they have the right tools, they’ll be able to run multiple campaigns concurrently, each on a different topic.

About 60 percent of the funding in the election campaign came from a relatively small group of people – and TNM has struggled to figure out how to act on that information. Sigamany said that they recognize that engaging major donors requires a different skill set that they don’t have right now. 

They’ve also run a few more general crowdfunding campaigns, such as ones pegged to anniversaries or government lawsuits against TNM. Sigamany said these haven’t performed as well as the campaigns for specific projects but they require substantially less effort. They’ll remain part of TNM’s strategy but they’ll do very little for them – no special graphics, no special events, no special products. 

Meanwhile, the membership campaign pegged to the 2021 Chennai rains, brought in about 140,000 rupees from about 110 people. “It was unusual in that we had a lot of people who contributed fairly small amounts of money – about 100 rupees or $1.36 around that time. That’s about one-tenth of TNM’s average crowdfunding contribution,” Sigamany said. “These are people who did not have the money to spare but they wanted to support us in some way. At the end of the day it was showing solidarity for us,” he said.  

Sigamany said there was little overlap between the supporters of each campaign. 

Now that they’ve landed on a strategy that’s partially proven itself, they’re aggressively building their email lists to expand the number of people who receive the crowdfunding appeals. Sigamany’s goal is to eventually be able to run three or four campaigns at once, each built around a different editorial project or interest – but right now they’re navigating ongoing issues with payment processors, so they’ve paused all campaigns for awhile. 

What they learned

Each issue has its own set of appeals and people who will come and support it. “Out of 1,000 supporters, maybe 100 of them will give money to the election; 100 people will give to the rains [campaign]. But the overlap between them was not much – maybe 20 percent,” Sigamany said. That’s actually a good thing – it greatly expands the number of people TNM can target with an appeal. 

A lot of supporters didn’t want a “member” experience. There are a lot of people out there who don’t want a member experience, for whom a recurring payment is too big of an ask or who are only interested in one coverage area. Membership isn’t appealing for them. “We got it wrong. We had membership as the core offering and the ability to make a one-time payment was an extra,” Sigamany said. By focusing exclusively on membership, TNM was giving up another important revenue opportunity.

But the ones who do want that member experience offer something deeper than money. “What membership actually gives us is a kind of engagement that we don’t get otherwise. Members are the ones who turn up to events, they ask questions, they are the voice of our audience. They turn up to editorial meetings and propose ideas. The membership is where you give us more than your money, you also give us your time and attention,” Sigamany said. They plan to test any new features or products with their members first.  

Don’t design something extra if people don’t need it. TNM tried a number of things to create a compelling member experience for diaspora members and, two years in, it’s made little difference. Diaspora members aren’t making use of the benefits created specifically for them. They just want to support The News Minute, same as the members in the country. 

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

Be prepared to accommodate many different behaviors. The News Minute assumed that membership is something everyone who supports their work would want. But they found that even people who had contributed to multiple crowdfunding campaigns were often uninterested in the deeper member experience. TNM needed to stop trying to convince those people to join and to instead focus on making it as easy as possible for them to support in the way they wanted. Newsrooms can’t change what supporters want out of their relationship with the newsroom, they can only change how they respond to different preferences. 

“We have always positioned crowdfunding as a way to support specific projects with one-time payments, while membership is a longer term commitment to support the journalism we do. We do not present them as mutually exclusive, but as being available for people to support in whichever way they feel comfortable with,” Sigamany summed it up.

Other resources 

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
PublicSource is a nonpartisan, nonprofit, digital-first media organization dedicated to serving Pittsburgh and the region.
Location
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Founded
2011
Membership program launched
2016
Monthly unique visitors
80,000
Number of members
1,112
Percentage of revenue coming from membership
10 percent

Match funds – in which an organization secures a large financial commitment from a foundation, contingent on raising an equal amount of money from other sources – are a key component of many American nonprofit newsrooms’ fundraising efforts. That’s the premise behind NewsMatch, a national U.S. matching gift campaign that runs annually from Nov. 1 through Dec. 31. If a NewsMatch participant reaches a predetermined fundraising goal, it gets a portion of the national match pool.

However, starting in 2021, news organizations with annual operating expenses over $1 million were no longer eligible for national match funds from NewsMatch. In 2022 Pittsburgh’s PublicSource, previously a beneficiary of the NewsMatch national match pool, built its own match pool, first by securing NewsMatch partner funds and then by rallying individual supporters to form their own match pool. They were able to form a $50,000 match pool, which they leveraged to raise another $60,000 in their year-end fundraising drive. 

Why this is important

Match campaigns have become a staple of American nonprofit newsrooms’ fundraising strategy. They add urgency and impact to fundraising campaigns, making it easier to pull in first-time supporters and to get additional funds from existing supporters. PublicSource’s most successful fundraising drives – in terms of number of donors and greatest donation amounts – are now ones with match funds attached.

Although many newsrooms across the U.S. employ match campaigns, MPP chose to highlight PublicSource because their approach highlights a way to leverage your board and highest contributing members, not just foundations. Newsrooms that aren’t eligible to receive foundation support, because of for-profit status or government restrictions, could employ this tactic not just with individuals, but companies. It also provides a great example of how to give your board a task that leverages their network. MPP believes that this approach could also be applied to longtime members who have shown interest in contributing more than financial support.

What they did

PublicSource began experimenting with match campaigns as part of NewsMatch. With NewsMatch, if a newsroom reaches a predetermined fundraising goal, it gets a portion of the national match pool. When NewsMatch changed the eligibility criteria for receiving matching funds, PublicSource took what it learned about successful match campaigns and created their own Pittsburgh-based pool.

Here’s how they did it:

Step 1: Source foundations who might be interested in contributing to a match pool

PublicSource received seed funds from several local foundations to help launch their newsroom, but Alyia Paulding, PublicSource’s membership & development manager, said they couldn’t rely just on those organizations forever if they wanted to be sustainable. It’s important to continue researching and prospecting for local foundation support, including smaller foundations that haven’t funded journalism before. 

One way PublicSource found new prospective funders is through community listening tours. They created a network map of local philanthropic foundations, devised a plan to meet prospective funders, and developed a series of questions to find out what philanthropic leaders are concerned about, what issues they’re focused on, and where they’re getting information.

“We’re just inviting people to have 15- to 30-minute conversations with us,” Paulding said. “It’s been wonderful. Sometimes it will lead to funding or support and sometimes it won’t, but it always leads to a connection.”

Paulding and her colleagues maintain a record of who they’ve talked to, notes about background and experiences, and takeaways from each conversation. 

“We conduct these conversations with people at all levels of giving capacity,” Paulding said. “While philanthropic leads come out of these chats, we very much want to be in contact with our community, and this is one way of doing that.”

Step 2: Pitch foundations on joining a matching pool

Once you’ve identified prospective local foundations, “a small match grant ask can be a great door-opener, especially if you have a foot in the door already,” Paulding explained. 

“Perhaps there’s a foundation who appreciates your work but has indicated they don’t want to give at a large level, or with whom you’ve discussed a particular program or project that didn’t end up panning out,” she added. “Maybe a $5,000 matching grant would fit perfectly for them.”

Many times, foundations don’t want to be the first to support something, so it’s helpful to already have some matching funds secured if you’re pitching someone for the first time. For existing  and past funders, staying in touch and passing along articles from your newsroom that are relevant to their priorities can be a good starting point for a conversation about being part of a match pool, Paulding said.

“We make connections for them between journalism and their areas of interest,” Paulding explained. “For an organization with an education focus, we’ll point to our education reporting.”

Paulding also added that it’s helpful to have evidence showing the success of matches in the past. 

End-of-year campaigns are a prime opportunity to ask foundations for donations in smaller amounts (between $1,000 and $5,000, for example) because they might have funds they need to allocate by the end of the year.

Step 3: Pitch individuals on joining a matching pool

The PublicSource team knew that they couldn’t rely solely on local foundations for matching grants, so in 2022, they reached out to regular individual supporters to pitch them on helping to create a match pool for individual supporters. 

First, Paulding sent emails to existing supporters, including versions for supporters with no additional gifts scheduled for the year, those with an upcoming recurring gift, and donors with a history of end-of-year giving. In those emails, she explained the idea behind the match pool and offered to schedule a Zoom or phone call or meet for coffee to talk about it further. 

“I wondered if you might be interested in using this year’s gift as a match to inspire other readers,” she wrote in an outreach email. “We typically have a year-end match pool where some of our donors pledge to match gifts in November and December. Matching is a very powerful tool and routinely results in our biggest fundraising response; our readers really love to give when their donation is matched!”

Paulding also made a presentation to PublicSource’s Board of Directors in which she outlined PublicSource’s fundraising goals and asked board members to help by recruiting their personal contacts to contribute to the match pool. Her pitch: “The power is in inviting people to join you.” She even role-played a conversation with a board member and potential match donor and gave board members an email template they could use.

The results

PublicSource raised $5,000 in matching funds for their spring 2022 campaign, all from just one foundation donor. 

For their 2022 end-of-year campaign, using the tactics outlined above, they secured a $50,000 match pool. Of that, $30,000 was from two foundations, partner match funds secured through NewsMatch. The remaining $20,000 came from 11 individual donors. The median individual donor gift was $1,000.

The last stage of a match campaign is the small-dollar fundraising drive to bring in as many donations as possible. You’ve likely gotten emails from a newsroom saying something like, “Donate today to help us unlock $20,000.” That’s this stage of the match campaign. 

In a typical match campaign, the organization only gets to keep the match pool if they reach their small dollar fundraising goal; the urgency is a motivator for new supporters.  PublicSource’s goal was $50,000, equal to the size of the match pool.

Their fundraising drive included:

  • Drafting email signatures to advertise the campaign and sending instructions to PublicSource staff members to adopt that language
  • Creating onsite appeals, including pop-ups, in-story ads, and homepage banners
  • Drafting a robust email campaign for all newsletter subscribers
  • Preparing social posts, including slides for Instagram stories
  • Compiling a list of reader testimonials, to quote in social posts and newsletter toppers
  • And creating a calendar to keep track of social posts, fundraising emails, and newsletter toppers throughout the campaign

The 2022 end-of-year small dollar campaign raised $62,635 from over 300 donors. More than 100 of them were first-time donors. PublicSource also unlocked an additional $4,000 in match bonuses. In total, the campaign brought in $116,635.

“We were fortunate and grateful to receive a couple larger gifts, but as always, overall success came down to small-dollar donors stepping up,” Paulding said. 

Raising their own local match pool, rather than tapping the NewsMatch pool, gave PublicSource much greater flexibility, she added. NewsMatch’s pool came with restrictions, such as a $1,000 maximum per donor and only matching double the one-time amount. 

Their own local match pool had no such restrictions. This allowed them to shift to a triple match to energize their campaign when it hit a slump in mid-December (in a triple match, a $10 contribution would be matched at 3x, so $30). 

“[It] allowed us to overcome the late-campaign stall-out many other newsrooms were experiencing,” she said. 

Editor’s note: MPP did not go into detail on how PublicSource runs its small-dollar campaign because it has substantial overlap with advice already given in the section “Growing your membership program.” In the “Resources” section, you’ll find their campaign schedule. MPP also recommends reading case study “How The Tyee plans a crowdfunding campaign in a week” to get a detailed overview of a successful 6-8 week campaign.

What they learned

Start with existing supporters. PublicSource began soliciting individual contributions to the match pool by identifying people who they deemed “very reliable supporters” – those who made recurring donations, attended PublicSource fundraising events, or given generously in the past.

Paulding reached out to one donor with a recurring $1,000 gift that would be charged soon. “We said, ‘Hey, your gift is coming up, would you like to be part of the match pool?’” Paulding recalled. That donor not only said yes, but asked to increase her gift to $5,000. “You never know when asking will pay off,” Paulding said.

Connect your ask to something they care about. When reaching out to existing donors, whether foundations or individuals, Paulding relies on information she’s compiled about the issues they care about, such as a comment they made about a specific beat or an event they attended in the past. The community listening tour mentioned above is another good source of information. “It’s easier than designing an entire fundraising campaign for anyone and everyone,” she said.

Finding community support isn’t just about fundraising. Paulding and team track all of the takeaways from their community listening tour conversations in a master document. That document is important for tracking philanthropic leads, but also helps them get a sense of overall themes about people’s information needs, media habits, and areas of interest – valuable information they share with the PublicSource editorial team. 

Matching works. Match campaigns are a major driver for new individual donations. “We’ve seen the greatest number of donors and the greatest donation amounts when gifts are matched,” said Paulding, adding that many donors will specifically leave comments with their gifts that say, “I’m giving because of the match.” 

“I have the sense that people wait all year for these opportunities,” Paulding added. “People give because they want to feel like they’re part of something that’s doing good, and when they feel like they’re doing something that’s doubly good, it’s a wonderful feeling.”

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

Don’t rely too heavily on one source of funding. Many newsrooms, not just PublicSource, had to shift their approach to end-of-year fundraising after NewsMatch changed its requirements. The NewsMatch decision is a good reminder that foundation goals, strategic focuses, and criteria for support can change, sometimes without much notice, and being dependent on any one funder, even just for an annual fundraising campaign, is risky. 

Be willing to be vulnerable. In 2021, when PublicSource began building a relationship with a new foundation, they told them about the NewsMatch change and how it would affect them. That foundation agreed to give them a $25,000 matching grant to make up for the shortfall. “That was absolutely catalytic for us,” Paulding said. “We realized we don’t need gigantic operating support [from Newsmatch] in order to help us do what we know works.”

Small donations add up. “When someone says that they’ll give a $200-a-year donation to the match pool, I’m excited,” Paulding said. Combined, those smaller donations can build to a sizable match pool that brings in even more donations.

Other resources 

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
The Bristol Cable is a community-owned cooperative news organization in Bristol, U.K.
Location
Bristol, U.K.
Founded
2014
Membership program launched
2014
Monthly unique visitors
50,000
Number of members
2,700
Percentage of revenue coming from membership
35%

The Bristol Cable is a British member-owned cooperative news organization. As a cooperative, community members are the owners of the Cable, not its staff or a company – and as owners, members are legal shareholders and therefore must be consulted when making certain strategic decisions that affect the organization. 

But just because members can weigh in doesn’t mean they will. The Cable team puts significant time and effort into making the process of participating in strategic decisions easy to understand, accessible, and enjoyable.

In the beginning the Cable mainly involved member-owners in decisions through its Annual General Meeting (AGM), which brings together staff and members to report on the accomplishments and challenges of the past year, review finances, discuss key questions, define strategy for the year ahead, and elect voluntary non-executive board members. 

Over time, based on member-owner feedback, they’ve added more frequent, lower-effort ways to weigh in on the Cable’s decisions as well, which made it possible for a greater number of members to play a role. This case study will walk you through how they involve members at different stages, based on the level of involvement they want.

Why this is important

The AGM is the principal way that the Cable’s members can influence the strategy and policies of the newspaper. Although the number of news organizations making their community members their owners is small, a growing number of newsrooms are exploring ways to involve  community members in newsroom decision-making. The Cable’s AGM offers one way to do that. 

The meeting also allows staff members to share their thinking about the paper’s work and respond to member feedback in a regular way that is manageable and is respectful of members’ time. 

But if you only offer one way to participate in decision-making, you’ll exclude many of your members. Over time, the Cable developed a participation ladder that expanded the number of ways members could weigh in, offering opportunities to participate that matched the level of involvement each member wanted. 

What they did

As a member-owned cooperative, anyone who becomes a member of the Cable has a say in the direction of the organization. Every year members elect a non-executive board of directors, which plays an advisory role, while the Cable’s staff run its day-to-day operations 

Other than serving on the board of directors, participating in the Annual General Meeting is the key way that members participate in strategic decision making. Each year members vote on the Cable’s budget and elect the board of directors. They also offer input on two to three strategic decisions that the staff wants feedback on that year. 

For example, in 2020 they discussed the Cable’s five-year strategic plan, which focused on topics such as whether the Cable should expand the geographic footprint of its coverage around Bristol and how it can create additional partnerships with local organizations. The goal is to have a wide-ranging discussion that gives the Cable a sense of their members’ values and how they feel about the decisions at hand.

“More often than not we’re trying to get more textured or graded understanding — a temperature check or a steer on things for the team to take away and turn into a project rather than this quite limiting concept of yes/no votes,” said Adam Cantwell-Corn, the Cable’s co-founder and coordinator. 

The AGM, which lasts 2 to 2.5 hours, is critical to the Cable’s mission, so they spend months preparing for it. Historically the Cable has held the AGMs at a local community center or sports hall, although the 2020 AGM was held on Zoom due to the pandemic.

A couple months before the AGM, the Cable staff narrows down the topics it wants to ask the members to weigh in on. They try to focus on larger strategic topics that will yield insights that will help inform how the staff approaches its day-to-day decision making, such as the Ethical Advertising Charter that they drafted at the 2016 AGM. They then share the topics with members in advance of the meeting. 

Then the staff turn to the logistics of the meeting, such as renting tables and chairs and lining up catering from a local restaurant. The Cable also recruits members to help out with tasks such as checking in attendees and confirming they’re actually members who are eligible to vote.

In addition to the logistics, the Cable team undertakes a month-long promotional campaign via their newsletter and social media to both encourage non-members to become members so they can attend and encourage existing members to come.

At the meeting itself, the team plays music, offers food and drinks, and hosts ice breakers to make people feel welcome and encourage them to participate. “One of the overwhelming bits of feedback we received [in previous years] was that it didn’t feel like an AGM, it felt like a community meeting,” Cantwell-Corn said. 

Attendees sit in small groups around tables, and Cable staffers and volunteers facilitate group discussions on the main topics of the evening. They document the conversations on big pieces of paper in the middle of each table to make the process more accessible to everyone. 

Photo via The Bristol Cable

The AGM was moved fully online in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. But even before the pandemic, as its membership grew, the Cable took steps to ensure the meetings were more accessible by allowing people to ask questions and offer feedback asynchronously and vote virtually.

The Cable has invested in building custom ‘Community Relationship Manager’ software, where members can respond to polls, participate in exercises, and manage their membership through a single login. (This product, called ‘Beabee’, is currently under development with German newsroom Correctiv.) Allowing online participation made the decision-making process more accessible since not all of its members are able to attend an event on a weeknight. 

The results

The Cable has about 2,700 members, and more than 90 attended the most recent virtual AGM in November 2020. But more than 270 participated asynchronously by voting for the board of directors or submitting questions for staff to answer. In previous years, when they met in-person, about 100 members attended the AGMs each year. 

The strategic discussions at the AGMs have gone from being the beginning and end of the collaborative decisions to the start of a whole series of smaller decisions.  

For example, at the 2017 meeting, the team facilitated a discussion with members about the boundaries between advocacy and journalism, and whether members wanted to see the Cable take a stand on certain local issues. They had small tables of about six people and did exercises such as dotmocracy to collect feedback, such as how members define advocacy. They then asked members to vote on whether the Cable should campaign on certain issues. Most people felt the Cable should pursue campaign journalism. (See full results)

With the affirmative vote in place, the Cable staff began identifying issues that it could take a stand on and build a campaign around.  

It brought some of those specific campaign ideas back to the members for further discussion via one of their monthly membership meetings, which are part meeting, part social event. 

“Okay, here’s what the whole organization as represented by the AGM has said about how we should do campaign journalism as a concept. Now let’s bring it down a level to ‘What should we do in terms of topics?’ What’s pertinent in the city and how can we interact with that as a journalism organization?,” Cantwell-Corn summarized. 

In collaboration with the members, the Cable identified two topics that they could campaign on that year: air pollution in Bristol and safe injection sites for people fighting addiction. They then presented the two topics to all members via an online forum and invited all members to vote on which topic they wanted to see the Cable campaign for. 

More than 600 members voted and engaged in the online conversation, compared with 30 people at the meeting who helped identify potential topics and 12 0people who attended the AGM and decided whether the Cable should engage in advocacy journalism. Air pollution received the most votes and in January 2019 the Cable launched its editorial campaign, Fight for Fair Air, which included investigative stories, editorials, commentary, and more. 

“It went from the AGM to being actually realized as an editorial product,” Cantwell-Corn said.

What they learned

You need to evolve as you grow. When the Cable had its first Annual General Meeting in 2015, it had fewer than 200 members. 

“It’s much easier to manage cooperative decisions when you have 30 people in the room rather than when you have 2,000 members,” said Lucas Batt, the Cable’s membership coordinator. That’s why they first turned to Loomi and later to developing a CRM.

The initial AGMs focused on the constitutional founding and key principles and norms — such as whether and how the Cable should accept advertising. But members’ interest in participating in decisions didn’t wane after those foundational decisions were made, and the Cable didn’t stop involving members either. More recent AGMs have focused on topics such as how to reach new readers and what the Cable can do to be an anti-racist organization. The platforms and topics evolved to fit the needs of the organization as it matured. 

How much involvement members want will vary. So should their options for getting involved. Even as committed cooperative owners, there’s still variation in how much members want or are able to participate. Members often have other commitments and priorities and only so much bandwidth.

The Cable has made it easier to participate by taking some decisions online via voting platforms, providing regular updates to members outside of the AGM, and making fewer open-ended asks, such as asking for feedback about how the Cable should approach editorial decision making. (There’s no single editor — The Cable editorial team operates democratically but independent of the membership on a day-to-day basis.) 

“We now do a lot more work of crafting genuine options for the membership to engage with: this is the scenario, here are a couple of options, and here are pros/cons,” said Cantwell-Corn.

The Cable has also gotten clearer about what each avenue for feedback is for.

The AGM is for big-picture strategic discussions and beginning the feedback loop with members, such as what kind of advertising the Cable will accept and whether the Cable should begin taking stances on some local issues, as detailed above. 

The monthly membership meetings are slightly less involved than the AGM. Although the Cable team originally used them for more nitty-gritty decision-making with members, members said they didn’t need that level of involvement. Now the Cable uses them to keep members up-to-date on the implementation of decisions made at the AGM, help prepare for upcoming AGMs, involve them in specific editorial projects, and hold social events. (However, the monthly meetings have been on pause during the pandemic.) 

When the Cable needs members to weigh in on an ongoing issue, they’ll conduct the discussion and/or vote via the online voting platform to maximize the number of people who can participate. 

At every stage, the Cable takes great care to appropriately frame the discussions and give members a clear sense of the scope of the decision they’re being asked to make. 

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

Not everyone wants to be highly involved. When the Cable began offering online voting, the total number of members who participated in decision-making went up, from the 100 or so people at an AGM to the hundreds that participated in various ways online. Although members’ valued the Cable’s commitment to cooperative decision-making, that didn’t mean they all wanted to attend a multi-hour Annual General Meeting. The stages of decision-making the Cable offers to members is a great example of what MPP calls the “participation ladder.” You need to offer flexible ways to participate if you want to attract a diverse group of participants. 

Always close the loop. If you’re going to ask members to take the time to weigh in on important decisions, you need to show them what you did with their feedback. If you don’t, they’re less likely to weigh in next time you ask for it. When the Cable produced its editorial campaign on air pollution, it showed the AGM attendees who approved the idea of campaigns that the staff not just listened, but was able to act on what it heard. 

Other resources

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
The Bristol Cable is a member-owned cooperative news organization in Bristol, U.K.
Location
Bristol, U.K.
Founded
2014
Membership program launched
2014
Monthly unique visitors
50,000
Number of members
2,700
Percentage of revenue coming from membership
35%

The Bristol Cable is a British member-owned cooperative news organization. As owners, members are legal shareholders and therefore must be consulted when making certain strategic decisions that affect the organization. One such decision is what kind of advertising the Cable will accept.

Initially the Cable decided to address that with an “Ethical Advertising Charter” that included types of companies and organizations from whom it would accept advertising from. But that ended up being too restrictive, so in 2017 they worked with members to amend the charter, focusing instead on criteria for what kind of advertising the paper would accept and how it would be presented to ensure that it aligned with the Cable’s values. 

The revised Ethical Advertising Charter helped the Cable balance the need to include its members in the decision-making process with the need to make daily operational decisions in an efficient manner that also isn’t burdensome for members. This case study outlines the process of developing the charter and applying it to advertising decisions.

Why this is important

Like any news organization, the Bristol Cable wants to ensure diversified revenue streams to support and sustain its journalism – and with a dedicated local audience for its print newspaper, the Cable sees advertising as a necessary part of its revenue pie. 

But as a member-owned cooperative, the Cable must ensure that its member-owners have a voice in decision-making – and that includes ensuring that any advertising it accepts is in line with its values as an organization and supported by the majority of its members. 

Previously the Cable had a list of organizational types that member-owners had approved accepting advertising from, but the staff found that relying on a list was too limiting and prescriptive, while also not capturing all factors. 

The Ethical Advertising Charter was amended to instead lay out guidelines for making advertising decisions, which the Cable team can then apply to each individual decision.

Although few news organizations are owned by their members and therefore must invite them into decision-making, more newsrooms are choosing to invite members into decision-making. The Bristol Cable’s solution for balancing the need to make individual decisions quickly while still honoring its member-owners’ values is instructive for any newsroom. 

What they did

From the outset, The Bristol Cable recognized the importance of diversifying its revenue streams, which is why it decided to accept advertising. 

However, they put strong guidelines in place for advertising: advertisements only run in the Cable’s quarterly print newspaper, not online or on any digital platforms, and are limited to only five pages for every 40 that the Cable publishes. 

Today the majority of the Cable’s funding comes from grants, but about 35 percent of its revenue comes from membership and another 5 percent or so comes from advertising, according to Adam Cantwell-Corn, the Cable’s co-founder and coordinator.

As a mission-driven publisher, Cable wanted to ensure that the ads it accepted were in line with its editorial values. So at the Cable’s 2016 Annual General Meeting, the Cable’s member-owners voted to put in place a list of organizational categories that they found acceptable and from which the Cable would be able to take advertising. (The Annual General Meeting is a yearly gathering where member-owners elect a board of directors, approve a budget, and weigh in on key organizational decisions.)

But it quickly became apparent that the 2016 policy was too specific, and the list was not serving its purpose. 

So the Cable team brought the issue back to its owners at the Annual General Meeting in 2017, the following year. Together, they decided to draw up a principle-based advertising policy that the Cable staff could apply to individual advertising decisions as they arose. Cantwell-Corn said the message from members was clear: they trusted the operations team to apply those principles to decisions the way that members intended.

The result was the Ethical Advertising Charter, which publicly explained Cable’s policies toward advertising. The charter has three primary sections: editorial integrity, advertisements, and decision making. 

The editorial integrity section explains that all advertising will be clearly labeled and separated from editorial coverage. It notes that the Cable will “ensure that its editorial content is not influenced by advertisers.” 

The advertisements section of the charter details what kind of ads the Cable will accept. The charter states that the paper will seek to run advertisements that: 

  • “promote social and cultural events and activities that may be of interest to its general readership;
  • products and services that are of direct benefit to local citizens and the city’s economy and environment;
  • such other adverts as are considered to be in line with the Cable’s ethical stance especially those from independent local businesses and third sector organisations.” 

The decision-making section explains that all determinations about advertising are delegated to the Cable’s advertising team to make in line with the member-approved guidelines. 

The results

The Cable staff has found the charter easy to apply, even when tough decisions arise. 

In early 2020 Bristol Water, the city’s public water utility, reached out to the Cable about placing an ad. The Cable’s advertising coordinator flagged it for the leadership team because of “excessive executive pay, dubious tax practises and unacceptable price increases,” and they assessed the company against the Ethical Advertising Charter. 

The editorial staff pulled Bristol Water’s annual financial reports and tax filings. They thought that high rates of executive pay and repeated attempts to raise water prices violated the Cable’s cooperative values, and thus were in conflict with the charter. 

“We believed this would compromise us,” said Lucas Batt, the Cable’s membership coordinator. 

The staff felt comfortable making this decision without consulting members because they had the principles outlined in the charter to guide them. 

Then, in November 2020, Cantwell-Corn published a story about the utility’s attempts to repeatedly raise water prices in Bristol. 

Along with the story, the Cable explained to readers that they had rejected an ad from Bristol Water. The charter stipulates that when the advertising team decides not to proceed with an advertisement, it must provide an explanation to the advertiser and to the public “where appropriate.” 

The Cable also turned it into a membership appeal. 

Cantwell-Corn said the appeal attracted “a number of people” to join, but he noted that it was “part of the overall sweep of communications that we’re doing that are trying to persuade people to convert members.”

The Cable has rarely had to invoke the charter since 2017. Cantwell-Corn attributed that to two key reasons: 

  1. The Ethical Advertising Charter is listed on the Cable’s website, so that helps filter out organizations who think they wouldn’t fit the bill. 
  2. There are lots of places where local organizations can advertise their goods or services — as all legacy news organizations know, it’s often cheaper and more effective to advertise via Facebook or Google where you can target specific audiences.

Cable members support the publication because they believe in what it stands for, and Cantwell-Corn said members were generally supportive of the decisions, such as the decision to take advertising that aligns with their values. 

 “We’re living in an imperfect world,” he said. “We have to have strong ethical principles, but we also make the compromises we need.” 

What they learned

Principles can be better than specifics. The 2016 Ethical Advertising Charter was just a list of organizational categories that the Cable was approved to accept advertising from, which didn’t do the Cable team much good when a company approached them that wasn’t on the list or was in a grey area. The revised charter instead outlines “principles and parameters” that can be applied to any company. This has given the document much broader applicability and removed the need to go back to members on the same issue repeatedly.  

The advertising charter can be a selling point. While the Ethical Advertising Charter does provide some limitations, including potential revenue opportunities, it also is a “mark of quality,” Cantwell-Corn said. And the Cable leans into mission alignment when they pitch advertisers.

The Cable has become a go-to for companies and organizations that are trying to present themselves as more ethical to their consumers, such as green energy suppliers, NGOs, and local businesses. 

“That means we can say to them as a value proposition to the advertisers that, within the boundaries we have set…, your advert will have prominence and will have quality pieces of editorial around it. The other adverts that are present also are validating the quality and the brand validity of your own company by being in The Cable,” Cantwell-Corn said. 

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

The core values you hold could limit existing revenue opportunities, but if you lean into them, they can also open up new ones. There’s a good chance there are companies and organizations out there who have similar values and want to ensure their advertising dollars go to like-minded organizations. By refocusing your pitch to advertisers on what you stand for and why it could be beneficial to align themselves with you, you might attract advertisers that a more transactional pitch might not have.

Establishing trust is not a one-time action. Inviting member-owners to co-write the Ethical Advertising Charter was a smart way to establish or strengthen trust in the Cable’s decision-making. But if the Cable hadn’t consistently applied the charter after it was approved, owners’ role in the drafting wouldn’t have made a difference. Each time the Cable properly applies the charter to an advertising decision, it is giving member-owners yet another reason to trust the Cable. 

Other resources 

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
The Compass Experiment is a local news laboratory founded by McClatchy and Google. They publish Mahoning Matters and the Longmont Leader
Location
Youngstown, Ohio
Founded
2019
Monthly unique visitors
190,000

The Compass Experiment, a local news laboratory founded by McClatchy and the Google News Initiative, launched Mahoning Matters in 2019 in Youngstown, Ohio. They launched on the heels of Youngstown’s longtime local newspaper, The Vindicator, shutting down.

Although the Compass Experiment newsrooms receive funding to get off the ground, they have a goal of becoming financially sustainable in the next few years, so as the team conducted its initial audience research, audience revenue was top of mind. 

This case shows how the Compass Experiment conducted focus groups without an audience of its own in order to assess membership viability. It also shows how they changed strategies when the coronavirus pandemic derailed their plans, what they’re hearing from their earliest supporters as they approach their first anniversary, and how they’ve applied those learnings to the launch of their second Compass newsroom in Colorado. 

Why this is important

Audience research can prevent you from making costly mistakes, especially in the pre-launch phase, when you don’t yet know your audience members. Without an audience research sprint, The Mahoning Matters and Compass Experiment teams wouldn’t have had a strong sense of who their audience was, what they wanted, and whether their audience had any interest in financially supporting their mission. 

But it can be hard to recruit audience research participants when you don’t have an audience. The Compass Experiment’s partnered with other local organizations to get the word out – a smart strategy that a newsroom of any size, especially if you’re assessing information needs or designing a product intended to help you reach new audiences.

Early audience research results indicated that Youngstown residents wouldn’t support a publication with a paywall, which pushed the Compass team toward membership as their model. Early audience research also pointed the team toward emphasizing their financial situation to their early readers as a way to prime them for future reader revenue and membership requests. It also gave them a mission: to be both the journalism of protection – uncovering corruption and misdeeds – and of discovery – telling the full story of Youngstown, successes and all. 

What they did

The summer before Mahoning Matters’ October 2019 launch, the Compass Experiment team headed to Youngtown to find out what residents really wanted from a local news organization if they had the opportunity to start from scratch – and whether they would be willing to support it financially.  The city’s only newspaper, The Vindicator, closed in August 2019, and the Compass Experiment team wanted to know how much residents understood how that was linked to the need for audience revenue. They settled on focus groups since they wanted to collect authentic thoughts, feelings and conversations from this new community they were getting to know.  

Throughout August, they hosted a series of focus groups at local library branches across  Youngstown. The library helped recruit participants by hanging flyers inside their branches and sharing the information on their social media channels.

Across three sessions, the Compass Experiment was able to talk to 60 Youngstown residents. Abby Reimer, Senior Manager of UX & Strategic Projects at McClatchy, led the focus groups, which she documented in this Medium post.

Reimer focused the focus groups on guiding questions like: What stories need telling in Mahoning County? What information would improve your day-to-day-life? Reimer’s synthesis for the Compass team focused on what residents strongly wanted, what they strongly didn’t want, and what they were most passionate about.

That winter, Compass Experiment General Manager Mandy Jenkins started recruiting to hire someone who’d be in charge of growth and launching a new membership program for the newsroom. They had big plans: exclusive content, live-events at breweries and summer fairs, and swag. 

Then, COVID hit. 

The Compass team decided to revise their plans to launch membership. They realized it was nearly impossible to come up with alternatives to their previous launch plans. Of course, events were out – and exclusive content felt cruel and out-of-mission for Mahoning Matters to start offering right as coronavirus and Black Lives Matter protests were reaching their 2020 peaks. 

Instead, Compass decided to again double down on audience research. This time, with in-person focus groups impossible and an existing newsletter list of readers, they opted for a survey. They sent the survey to 50 people who financially contributed to the newsroom in the past year. They wanted to know: what do you, our early supporters, like the most about what we’re offering so far? What can we improve? See here for that Mahoning Matters Contributor Survey

A sample question from Mahoning Matters’ Contributor Survey

The results

The focus group process in August 2019 helped the team determine what, exactly, their new newsroom would cover. Attendees wanted to easily access and understand public resources like job listings, veterans’ resources, and affordable housing access. Overall, they heard from attendees that Mahoning Matters would need to both be the journalism of protection – uncovering corruption and misdeeds and of discovery – telling the full story of Youngstown, successes and all. 

They also heard loud and clear from the focus group participants, essentially, “If your newsroom has a paywall, we are out.” Reimer’s notes showed the majority of participants felt strongly that they local news should be accessible for as many people as possible. This has pointed Compass Experiment team to membership as the best path forward. 

The team received 20 responses to the survey it sent to the site’s first 50 financial supporters. This was less than the team expected for a completion rate, and they planned to run a virtual focus group with survey respondents who opted into one, but only four people indicated interest.

The team was still able to gather some interesting insights, including what drove people to support them: the newsletter, watchdog journalism, and hyperlocal news. Many said they had been Vindicator subscribers. One said, “The Vindicator closing was a shock to me, and I don’t want that to happen, again.” Another said, “We need independent local journalism dedicated to Youngstown.”

This October, the Mahoning Matters team plans on harnessing the excitement around their one-year anniversary to conduct a wider survey and convene another focus group.  This time, they intend to send out the survey to their entire email list to take a temperature check on how satisfied their readers are with their work, one year in. 

What they learned 

It’s hard to conduct audience research without readers. The Compass Experiment team found it difficult to recruit folks to attend their focus groups early on without an existing base of people or readers. The early focus group participants were mostly a mix of people recruited from Jenkins’ blog post in July announcing that the Compass Experiment was coming to Youngstown (Jenkins had included a dummy email list for people to sign up for updates) and folks that the local libraries recruited from hanging flyers. Another thing the team learned: if you want to attract people to your focus groups, serve lunch! 

Especially in the early days of a newsroom, consider creative ways of reaching the community members you seek to serve. Some creative ways include partnering with a local library to help recruit participants, or purchasing the email list of potential partners in community media. to give you a starting point. The Compass Experiment team was able to put their own learning here into practice when they launched their second site, The Longmont Leader, in Longmont, Colorado.

This time around, the team knew they needed help finding an early target audience. Given the statewide lockdown in Colorado, they had to do surveys and small group discussions virtually rather than at fairs, farmer’s markets, or local microbreweries. So, instead of relying on Facebook lead acquisition and Google ads to build the initial audience list, they purchased the digital assets of the Longmont Observer, a nonprofit community news site, including its email list of nearly 1,000 local readers.

They sent a survey to this list of 1,000 people and, in only a few days, received 128 responses in return. This time, enough people opted in for the focus group that they were able to host three virtual focus groups and dig into their early audiences’ thoughts on local news in the area, their information needs, and what they liked (and didn’t like) about living in Longmont.  

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

Be clear with your audiences about your financial situation. Around the same time the Compass Experiment launched a local news site in Youngstown, Ohio, the local newspaper in Youngstown (The Vindicator) was shutting its doors.

The Compass Experiment learned from early focus groups that people in Youngstown, even die-hard news consumers, had no idea the Vindicator was in such a state of distress. The Compass Experiment is making sure that both of their newsrooms are clear to tell people, “here is our financial situation – we have this runway with Google, but it will run out. New advertising money is not coming in. We will need your help.” They plan on continuing to emphasize this messaging with their readers and early contributors as they gear up for an eventual membership launch. 

Other resources 

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
A local news organization that covers public education in Chicago, Colorado, Detroit, Indiana, New York, Newark, Philadelphia, and Tennessee
Location
Multiple locations in the U.S.
Founded
2014
Membership program launched
2018
Monthly unique visitors
743,000
Number of members
1,100+
Percentage of revenue from membership
1 percent

From the beginning Chalkbeat has had a way for readers to financially support their work, but it was a straightforward donations strategy. They first flagged membership as something to consider in 2014, but didn’t have the capacity to pursue a full membership program at the time. 

In the years following, they continued to grow in readership and revenue, but it wasn’t until 2018 that they had the bandwidth to answer key questions about membership: What would it be at Chalkbeat? Why would they do it? And how significant of an investment would it be to launch and maintain?

Most importantly, they needed to identify the organizational goal for membership: what does success look and feel like, and how could we measure it?

Building on what Chalkbeat knew from years of receiving reader donations, Chief Strategy Officer Alison Go spent two months looking across the organization to develop a framework for determining whether membership was worthwhile and identifying milestones that would tell them if they were on the right track. They launched their membership program in November 2018. 

Why this is important

When assessing whether they’re ready for membership, news organizations spend months choosing their tech stack and designing their membership program. But they often miss a critical step before that: getting specific about what it will look like if membership “works” for them. 

Membership is not a brand campaign that you can toggle on and off when you need a revenue boost or have a bit of extra time. It is both a new relationship with your supporters and a product that you need to manage. Setting off on this path without defining success makes it difficult to assess whether membership is having a positive enough effect on your organization to be worth the significant investment it requires. 

Chalkbeat’s effort to distill its membership experiment into four hypotheses that could be tested and measured within a year of launching a membership program is instructive for news organizations trying to come up with their own definition of success. 

What they did

The first thing the Chalkbeat team established was that membership was not going to be a quick experiment that it could try and fail and then wind down. There would be significant staff, technological, marketing and editorial investment, and the commitments made in the course of a membership program would need to be fulfilled well beyond the end of an end-of-year or spring campaign, said Go.

For two months in 2018, Go was focused full-time on answering a key question: what would it look like for Chalkbeat if membership works? And almost as important, they identified what it would like for membership to not work, and the steps they would take to phase it out. 

“It was not anything technical, it wasn’t like a physical thing or resource, it was the confidence that we would at minimum learn something from this,” Go said.

They identified four hypotheses that they could test by launching membership:

  • Acquisition: Framing small donations as “membership” will drive the highest possible revenue from small donors.
  • Retention: The membership program will have the lowest churn of all small-donor programs.
  • Knowledge community: The membership program will be a critical pillar for a robust editorial knowledge community, ultimately improving the journalism itself and increasing our impact on the community.
  • Costs: The overhead to maintain a membership program will be offset by the benefits. 

They then distilled each hypothesis into a question that data could answer, and identified a “learning time frame” for answering the question, using data from previous donation drives as a baseline. 

  • Acquisition: Does this convert better than our previous campaigns? (1 month)
  • Retention: Do people cancel recurring contributions at a slower rate? If yes, what about the membership program causes this change in behavior? Is it the “membership” framing or specific initiatives within the membership? (3 to 12 months)
  • Knowledge community: Have membership initiatives increased our interaction with our community? Has the quality of our stories improved as a result? Has the reach and impact of our stories increased as a result? (1 year)
  • Costs: What is needed to maintain a membership program and how much does it cost, now and at scale? (1 year)

They decided that if membership did not create incremental revenue but “enabled us to create a feedback loop that we weren’t able to have without it, it was valuable.” 

They also identified revenue milestones that would tell them the role membership would play in the larger financial model. For instance, if membership took 50 percent of an employee’s time to administer and maintain, did it actually pay for itself? And if not at the time, at what size audience would it begin to make sense?

The results

Almost two years after launch, they have more than 1,100 members across the U.S., have generated insights into their four hypotheses, and added one more after launch. This bolstered the case for hiring a dedicated person to support membership. 

Acquisition: They did not see a significant spike in member/donor acquisition in the first two months. Membership grew at about the same rates as their newsletters did.

Retention: Member/donor retention started in the high 90th percentile, and it has remained high since. 

Knowledge community: They have found that it’s easier to engage with members than it was to engage with donors because of the ongoing communication with them, but they are struggling to build local knowledge communities because the membership program is run centrally, at the national level. Kary Perez, who runs their membership program today, says: “As our national team grows, we can continue testing what a national-level knowledge community might look like.” 

Costs: “Our [newsletter] subscriber to member conversion numbers are average. Even at average, we know we can do better. The membership program conclusively pays for itself – the ROI isn’t super high, but it pays for itself. …Even at the launch of the membership program, it was clear it was worth the investment,” Perez wrote in an email. Their launch year, they brought in $53,000 from members, not quite hitting their $60,000 goal – but the following year they brought in $80,000, exceeding their new $55,000 goal.

Synergies with other initiatives: Chalkbeat uses the end-of-year membership campaign to bolster major donor giving and vice versa, such as having a major donor offer a match to motivate readers to become members. Plus, the development team can reuse membership assets and content in their outreach to major donors. 

After their successful launch and end-of-year campaign in 2018, they knew they should invest in a grander version of individual donations, and that they needed a more dedicated resource to do that. In 2019 they hired Perez as the senior marketing manager to manage the membership program.

What they learned

Membership has proven to have both revenue and engagement impact for Chalkbeat. That’s why Perez, the organizational point person for membership, sits between the revenue and editorial teams. They’re still trying to understand which is the primary role it plays, she says. The $80,000 membership brought in for 2019-20 is substantial, but that was only 1 percent of their budget due to their foundation and major donor support. For this reason, it might end up being more critical as a mechanism for greater engagement.

Having membership raises questions about inclusivity. Member benefits are inherently exclusive, and Chalkbeat is asking itself whether it’s possible to square special experiences for members with their organizational commitment to equity and inclusion. “The whole point of our model is that everyone should have access to our work. The questions we ask ourselves are: How does any nonprofit have a membership program? How are we meant to be accessible for everyone while also offering member benefits? How can we create a truly inclusive membership program?” Perez says. 

So far, they have decided that they won’t limit access to anything that’s useful for creating educational outcomes, and they’re exploring how they might create pathways to membership that don’t require a monetary exchange. 

Key takeaways and cautionary tales

A membership program needs measurable goals. Setting off on a path to membership without defining success makes it difficult to assess whether membership is having a positive enough effect on your organization to be worth the significant investment it requires. As Go noted, membership isn’t a quick experiment that can be wound down if it doesn’t “work.” Chalkbeat’s effort to distill its membership experiment into four hypotheses that could be tested and measured within a year of launching a membership program is instructive for news organizations trying to come up with their own definition of success.

Other resources

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
A nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization, providing Michigan readers with daily, fact-driven journalism covering the state's issues, including diverse people, politics, and economics
Location
Ann Arbor, Detroit, and Lansing, Michigan
Founded
2011
Launched membership
2019
Monthly unique visitors
About 1,000,000*
Number of members
7,414
Percentage of revenue from membership
11 percent

In just two years, Michigan’s Bridge Michigan increased reader donations by 66%, increased the number of monthly donors by 54%, and grew its email list by 114% by enacting strategies. 

Bridge did this by running a series of targeted experiments at each level of the audience funnel. It set clear goals and targets for how it would define success at each level, and then enacted strategies around SEO, email newsletter growth, and more to meet those goals.

The test-and-learn mindset allowed Bridge Michigan to experiment with new content formats by expanding its email newsletters and making its coverage more search friendly, which drew in new regular audiences and attracted new members.

*Pre-coronavirus pandemic, Bridge Michigan averaged around 300,000 monthly unique page visitors.

Why this is important

Bridge Michigan’s strategies weren’t revolutionary. They were simple and straightforward. By focusing on bite-size tests focused on audience growth through SEO and audience habituation through email newsletters, Bridge was able to turn small, individual successes into a larger strategic win through increased revenue and increased membership.

Newsrooms looking to implement test-and-learn strategies for membership should start by focusing on small experiments. 

“You don’t need every unique visitor to give you money, but you need to find ways to get people to do that at each level,” Bridge Michigan’s growth strategist Bill Emkow said during a presentation at ONA19 in partnership with the Facebook Journalism Project. Bridge was a participant in the 2019 Facebook Membership Accelerator. (The Lenfest Institute partners with Facebook to administer the program and share best practices from its participants.) 

What they did

Bridge entered the Facebook Journalism Project’s Accelerator Program with some financial support from readers, but no formal strategy for growing its membership program.

The first thing Bridge Michigan had to do was define its audience funnel. Broadly, a funnel stars with occasional users and filters down to regular users and ultimately contributors.

Here’s how Bridge defined its funnel based on its reader habits and audience analytics: 

Underpinning every stage of the funnel is regular publication of high-quality coverage. Bridge publishes about 3-5 news stories per weekday. Here’s a breakdown of Bridge’s strategy at each level: 

Unique visitors to repeat visitors

At this stage, Bridge focused on SEO-friendly headlines that could get their stories in front of new audiences. 

“The most effective way to build the unique visitor base is by having more stories and more posts on the topics the audience cares about,” Emkow said. 

The next step is getting unique visitors to come back at least five times a month. 

Bridge pays close attention to its audience analytics, and if it recognizes that a particular topic is attracting a consistent audience, it will double down on that coverage. Emkow uses Google Search Console to identify which search terms are leading people to Bridge. He sends a weekly memo to the staff with the specific terms readers are using to reach the site via search.

In 2018, Michigan voters legalized recreational marijuana. Bridge noticed that the topic began trending on Google and attracting social media attention the next year, as the law was about to go into effect. 

So Bridge increased its coverage and then optimized past coverage for SEO as well. The site assigned one of its politics reporters to dive into marijuana. 

FJP’s David Grant explained how they did it:

Following SEO best practices, they linked every new marijuana story to old marijuana stories and wrote keyword-rich page titles and headlines. In the article below, notice how (circled in red) there’s a list of previously published stories before you start reading the article itself. The story’s first sentence includes the term “marijuana in Michigan.” The entire story is optimized for SEO.

However, a handful of their stories didn’t generate much readership, so the team assumed the topic was dead. 

Though Emkow argues that they ultimately pulled coverage too soon. 

“I argue that we just had three stories that didn’t connect,” he said over email. “We should’ve kept chipping away, IMHO. I think that lessons we learned from marijuana were applied during coronavirus. We just keep hammering away, and we’ve been rewarded by readers.”

Growing its email list

Email is a powerful tool for developing habit with readers, a prerequisite for converting them to members. 

“It’s letting you into their lives more,” Emkow said. “Once they let you in, you can have a conversation with them.” 

Bridge has a daily newsletter, and it encourages readers to sign up with non-intrusive sliders that pop-up after the reader has spent a few seconds on the page. It has also added a week-in-review newsletter and RSS-automated health and environment newsletters that are sent automatically the day after the site publishes a story on that topic. 

Bridge tweaks the language on the email calls-to-action depending on the source of where the reader is coming from, or the news of the moment. It previously targeted CTAs to a reader who clicked on a link via Facebook with an email sign up encouraging them to become less reliant on the social giant’s algorithms while someone who came by typing bridgemi.com into their browser will get a more general CTA.

The lefthand image is a message for a reader who arrived at Bridge after typing it into their browser. On the right is a visitor who arrived via Facebook.

Tools such as OptInMonster, which Bridge Michigan uses to power its lead generation, offer A/B testing capabilities, so you can test out different calls to action to see which is most effective based on. 

Bridge has also used Facebook lead generation ads to grow its email list. 

Conversion oriented

Your owned-and-operated platforms, such as your website, are the most important place to ask for donations. Bridge made the donation button more prominent and added a stronger call-to-action. 

The original “Donate” button

The more prominent “Donate” button Bridge uses today

It also added pop-ups to news stories and modules at the bottom of articles that encourage support. By seeing how users respond to these different call-outs, Bridge has been able to grow its donations. 

Most Bridge readers only read one story, so Bridge has three different CTAs per story to encourage membership. 

“Yes, be mission oriented, but to create sustainability be conversion oriented,” Emkow told me in an email. “To paraphrase Eminem, if you have only one shot to turn a casual reader into a paying member, what do you do?”

Sustaining members

Bridge realized that its donations page was not set up to encourage recurring contributions even though its ultimate goal was  to encourage one-time donors to contribute on a recurring basis and provide stable, predictable revenue. So they defaulted their donation pages to a monthly ask.

It also raised their default membership option. Bridge wanted to set its default membership option to $10/month, but Tim Griggs, its accelerator coach, encouraged the site to set it at $15/month. In his post, Grant explained how behavioral economics informed that decision: people are most likely to choose the default price, followed by the cheapest option. 

Griggs suggested Bridge Michigan make their default $15 per month, $10 as a second option, and any amount as a third. “It worked,” Emkow says. “We saw an immediate increase in overall monthly donations, but specifically $10 and $15 per month.”

Setting defaults is essential — you need to tell your audience what you want from them. 

“A blank field leads to confusion,” Emkow said via email. ‘How much should I give? How much do they want? What’s a lot, what’s too little?’ Eliminate confusion. The $15/month suggestion was basic behavior economics: people tend to choose the default, but the second most popular option is the second-highest price option.”

Bridge has also started re-sending fundraising emails to readers who didn’t open them. It started as a small experiment: Two days after sending a fundraising email it sent it again, and it made nearly the same amount as the first email. 

A quick note: Though many news organizations, including Bridge Michigan, use donations and membership interchangeably, we consider them two distinct engagement and revenue models with different relationships between supporters and the newsrooms

The results

Bridge has seen growth at every stage of the audience funnel. 

In 2019, toward the top of the funnel, these strategies grew its overall unique users by 35 percent to 2.4 million and its email subscribers skyrocketed by 59 percent to 13,374. 

The site generated nearly $300,000 from 3,600 members — a 45 percent increase in revenue and 54 percent increase in total members. The growth has continued in 2020. As of early September, it has 7,414 members who have contributed $436,724.

Emkow also recently launched a Facebook lead gen campaign to attract new email addresses. The ad targeted users who were similar to Bridge’s most loyal email subscribers and who resided in Michigan, the site’s target audience. It used an image from its COVID-19 tracker, and removed the words and numbers because Facebook dings images that are text heavy.

In the first two days, the ad netted Bridge 331 new email addresses with a $0.29 CPA. Over three weeks, he was able to add 2,180 new email subscribers at a cost of $.64 per email. 

Emkow initially spent $606, but raised the budget to $3,000. “I don’t want to lose the opportunity at this cost,” he said. 

What they learned

Keep track of costs. Facebook can be a valuable lead-generation tool — but the juice has to be worth the squeeze. Emkow said he’ll boost posts or use Facebook’s email lead generation tool, and then meticulously watch costs to make sure that they are staying below targeted CPAs. 

You don’t need to be an analytics expert.: Emkow is the first to admit that he’s not an expert at Google Analytics. While there are many sophisticated analytics tools, Emkow was able to glean insights by look at each level of the funnel individually and then seeing how they correlated. For example, he’d look first at overall traffic levels and then at the number of email newsletter subscribers. If he saw growth in both categories, then it would be safe to assume that readers were moving down the audience engagement funnel. 

“I’m just looking at correlations. If you’re seeing big growth in one spot and not correlating growth in other spots, there’s something you need to check out,” Emkow said. 

Pick your spots. Most membership-driven newsrooms, including Bridge, have limited resources. The site uses a combination of editorial judgment and its analytics insights to make decisions about what to test and which areas to focus on that will move its audience down the funnel. Newsrooms should 

“Be the authority on certain topics that matter to both your audience and your editorial judgment,” Emkow said. 

• Put user experience first. You don’t want to overwhelm your audience, and you should be careful about how intrusive your CTAs are. Let the data be your guide. For example, Bridge noticed that its conversion rate on on-site email pop-ups didn’t change when it changed its frequency from every one day to every three days. So users saw the pop-ups less, and Bridge still was able to grow its email list. 

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

Focus on each step of the funnel. By breaking its strategy down by steps in the funnel, Bridge was able to run concentrated experiments that focused on growing its overall audience and increasing its email list, which ultimately moved the needle on Bridge’s overall goal — growing its membership base. 

By keeping its experiments small and manageable, Bridge was able to make incremental progress that ultimately resulted in significant growth. 

Let the data guide you: It’s important to be data literate and understand what your audience analytics are telling you, but membership-driven publications need to have strong values and editorial judgement. Don’t let the data lead you to pursue audiences and stories that aren’t in line with the core membership value proposition. 

Other resources

Newsroom overview

Who They Are
A non-profit investigative newsroom committed to informing society of injustices and abuses of power while promoting media literacy and educational programs
Location
Berlin and Essen, Germany
Founded
2014
Launched membership
2015
Monthly unique visitors
670,000
Number of members
10,400
Percentage of revenue from membership
30 percent

In 2018, German investigative newsroom Correctiv set out to make the Hamburg housing market more transparent by finding out who owned residential properties. In many countries, that’s a straightforward process – but German law only allows individuals with a “legitimate interest” to inspect property records. Journalists aren’t covered by that definition. Tenants are.

So Correctiv turned to CrowdNewsroom, a platform they developed in 2015 to help them enlist community members in their investigative projects and assemble data sets. To get the property ownership information they needed for “Who Owns Hamburg?”, they invited readers to upload their leases to the platform. They collected more than 1,000 records, creating a meaningful property register that served as the starting point for investigations into the property market in Hamburg.

Then they took the project on the road. Today Correctiv has property ownership databases for other cities in Germany, and they’ve proven that inviting readers into journalism isn’t just a nice thing to do – it can create more impactful investigations, too.

Why this is important

By identifying a way for people to meaningfully contribute to its work, Correctiv has been able to investigate topics it wouldn’t have otherwise been able to investigate and given community members an opportunity to co-create journalism.  By building its own platform for this way of working, it could collaborate more fully with them. And by partnering with other newsrooms, it’s been able to broaden the number of people who contribute.

Audience participation is most fulfilling for audience members and most impactful for news organizations when the news organization finds the intersection point between their needs and audience members’ motivations to participate. Correctiv succeeded at this: it needed property records, and residents wanted to understand the housing market they lived in.

What they did

Correctiv began developing CrowdNewsroom in 2015 to enable large-scale reader involvement in investigations. Put simply, CrowdNewsroom creates forms that enable structured data collection from users. They first used it for investigations into financial irregularities in local banks and tracking class cancellations in public schools. 

“CrowdNewsroom is like a Google system for answers that are not given yet,” Correctiv publisher David Schraven told Solution Set.

CrowdNewsroom investigations tend to follow the same general process and take a few months to complete.

Here’s a look at how the typical CrowdNewsroom process works, with some details about what that looked like for “Who Owns Hamburg?” project in 2018:

Get the word out. Together with its newsroom partner, Correctiv launches a four-to-six week campaign to spread the word about the project, generate interest among the community, and encourage participation. For “Who Owns Hamburg?”, Correctiv partnered with local newsroom Hamburger Abendblatt, and the local tenant’s association helped promote it. Correctiv and its partner newsroom publish daily stories about the issues the project is trying to uncover, promote the CrowdPlatform callout on social media, and hold events. All of this is done with the goal of collecting data and making people aware of the investigation. 

“Before you start the campaign, you collaborate with the newspaper to give people a sense of what you’re doing, why you’re doing it, and why it’s important,” Schraven said. “It’s a series of articles, it’s radio interviews, it’s a real journalistic series of stories.”

Collect data. Throughout the campaign, community members upload data and information into CrowdNewsroom. For “Who Owns Hamburg?”, individuals uploaded their leases to the CrowdNewsroom database and then gave Correctiv permission to pull the records from the land registry in their name. Correctiv also created a website for the Hamburg housing -market investigation where they regularly offered updates on the progress of this project and tenants could store their evidence and information.

To ensure the data is credible, every submission to CrowdPlatform has to be backed up with documentation.  Correctiv will only publish information that is verifiable. 

Process the data. Once the campaign ends, journalists from Correctiv and its partner newsroom will start to process, fact-check, and verify the collected data, then look for patterns to serve as the starting point for stories. Both Correctiv and its partner newsrooms have full access to the database. 

“Then we take the most important stories and report on them,” Schraven said. “But we keep the other stuff just private because this is private data and we’re not going to publish like Wikileaks everything that we’ve found.”

The stories that come out of the CrowdNewsroom are then published and shared by both outlets. 

The results

“Who Owns Hamburg?” took six months to complete. By the end of the campaign, about 1,000 tenants uploaded documents about the owner of their apartments. That data allowed Correctiv to tie more than 15,000 apartments to specific property owners. From that, they discovered that money laundering was behind about 10 percent of the real estate sales in Hamburg. They also determined that more than 1 in 3 of the 707,000 apartments and houses rented in Hamburg belongs to the city’s urban housing association in Hamburg or a cooperative. 

Correctiv also published 10 examples of how non-transparency harms tenants (and what could help), which divulges more findings from the research, such as the fact that tenants don’t always know who their owner is. This was only possible because of the CrowdNewsroom platform.

Correctiv spent about €1 million to develop CrowdNewsroom. Half of the funding came from a three-year €500,000 grant from Google’s Digital News Innovation Fund.

“The rest was from our other sources of income,” Schraven said. “We have foundations funding us, we have individuals donating money to us as a nonprofit. We even have a small for-profit outlet that publishes books.”

What they learned

Making the project accessible for people to participate is key. The CrowdNewsroom investigations can’t happen unless people know about it, so Correctiv approaches its CrowdNewsroom investigations almost as if they were fundraising or political campaigns — it unleashes a torrent of coverage, promotion, and events to get the word out about the investigations and encourages people to participate. It also makes the CrowdNewsroom platform itself intuitive and simple to use. As of February 2019, more than 4,000 people had contributed to CrowdNewsroom projects.

Keep callouts focused. In its first CrowdNewsroom investigations, Correctiv asked its readers overly broad questions. The responses were all over the place and were not as helpful as they could be. Correctiv realized it needed to create a more focused way to ask readers to contribute, and began focusing on seeking out just one thing from readers for each investigation. When asking readers to get involved in the production of journalism, it’s important to spend time making sure the call outs are clear and set up to elicit responses that are actually actionable. 

Collaboration with other publishers is essential. Correctiv also realized that its reporting would have more impact through working with other news organizations. By partnering with a variety of other publishers for CrowdNewsroom, Correctiv is able to reach audiences it would not have access to otherwise. When it covered class cancellations in public schools, for example, one of Correctiv’s partners was a student newspaper, which allowed it to make more focused call outs and also ensured that the reporting was reaching relevant communities. 

Key takeaways and cautionary notes

Correctiv’s investigations would not be possible without the individuals that assisted with the reporting and contributed their information. 

The benefits of co-creation co-creating journalism with community members extends beyond just the investigations at hand. Correctiv can use the platform to identify some of its most engaged constituents and invite them into the reporting process. But Schraven also said the process has been a powerful fundraising tool and more broadly helps educate the community about the importance of independent journalism and how investigative reporting actually works. 

“But to be clear: Not the published stories are most important in running the CrowdNewsroom,” Schraven said over email. “Most important is the debate and the engagement within the community of the newspapers and media organizations we are running the CrowdNewsroom with. It is like a campaign for good journalism in a community.”

“When it comes to community building, something like this is really important,” Schraven said. “People understand that we care about their issues, we’re working on it, and we’re not just talking about it. We really put effort into it. They understand that if we want something like this to happen, we need to support those guys. It works. When you see this CrowdNewsroom, it’s not something you just do for one month — it’s for a few months. You build community around the newsroom. When you’re in the local area, it’s exactly the area you’re publishing day-to-day and all these readers and contributors understand why you’re there.”

Other resources